@firefly,
firefly wrote:
I'm curious about why you felt the need to subvert the authority of the owner of the site by publishing a screed from a member who he has banned from posting. If Robert does not want to provide Hawkeye with a platform on his web site, why are you undermining him by providing Hawkeye with that platform?
As A2K members we are essentially Robert's guests, bound by his rules and his dictates because we are congregating in his house. If he decides to ban a particular guest from entry, for whatever reason or violation he sees fit, sneaking that guest back in, by opening a side window for him, as you have effectively done for Hawkeye, is something I see as being egregious on your part.
Hawkeye lost his privilege to use this site to express his views. You seem to be more concerned with acing as a conduit for Hawkeye to continue to maintain a presence here, and thereby collaborating with him in flaunting Robert's authority, then you are in elevating the discussion about how to improve the site, or the appropriate behavior which "guests" here should display if they don't want to be shown the door.
I was wondering when a post like this would be made.
I don't believe you really are curious at all. Instead, I believe you've already arrived at an answer to your question and you wished to express your opinions concerning it. This is fine but I will respond somewhat as if yours is a actual inquiry.
First of all I don't consider the posting of Hawkeye's letter to be subverting anyone's authority, If Robert views it that way he can suspend me, but I see that he doesn't.
I also don't see this as anything even close to "sneaking him in through a back door." It never even crossed my mind to be a continuing conduit for messages from Hawkeye. It wasn't requested of me and had it been I would have refused. This was a one time deal. Hawkeye was whisked away without being given a chance to be heard a final time relative to his "side" of the story. I thought members would be interested in his "side", particularly in light of the Robert's announcement of changes and tighter controls, and continue to hold that belief. Whether it did or not is dependent upon the points of view of those who read it, but it could provide insight into the process of suspension. You may or may not have noticed, but Robert has hardly been effusive in his explanation of how suspensions operate and precisely what will trigger them. There have been a number of questions concerning the process asked by members throughout several related threads.
I also thought Hawkeye should have the opportunity to provide his "last words" and I would feel the same for izzy or anyone else whose suspension I might, otherwise, applaud. Obviously people such as yourself may not be interested or curious, and you were not compelled to read the letter. It is but one thread of many. I don't have any ability to propel it to "Popular" status, but that's where it currently stands. You may also be of the opinion that Hawkeye didn't deserve the opportunity I've provided his words, and that it was improper of me to facilitate it. You've had the opportunity to express that opinion and it is duly noted.
You need not lecture me on the private nature of this site and the acceptability of Robert setting whatever rules he feels are appropriate. I have made this point myself on several occasions. Unless Robert chooses to have all posts reviewed before they appear, people are free to post whatever they please...at least once. Fully understanding the way this site operates and Robert's "authority" I chose to post Hawkeye's letter. If Robert had decided that it was as egregious as you believe it to be, he might have suspended me or banished me permanently. If he had I would not have complained, but then you would never know that because I wouldn't be able to post anything and no one would have agreed to post one last message from me.
Frankly, I never gave much thought to the consequences that posting the letter might result in because a) I agreed to do it and once agreed I would fulfill my promise b) While I enjoy the forum, if I leave it for good I would prefer to do so on my own terms at a time of my choosing, but in any case I would manage to make what's left of my life meaningful, even without A2K c) Most importantly, I had a solid conviction that Robert would not take the umbrage you have taken. It would have been petty of him and it is also my opinion that regardless of what faults he may or may not have, pettiness is not among them.
I am not about to justify to your satisfaction the efforts I have taken to elevate the discussion in this forum, first because I don't think it's necessary that I try, secondly because I doubt I ever could, (Some levels of animosity just don't seem to be amenable to mitigation efforts), and finally because, honestly, your opprobrium is not something that concerns me much at all.
Of course you can think what you will, but I don't believe for a second that Hawkeye's desire to be heard one last time had anything to do with "flaunting Robert's authority." If that was all I thought it was, I wouldn't have agreed to it. I've no desire to childishly flaunt his desire either, but that doesn't mean I'm going to walk on eggshells with him. I don't think he's looking for that level of deference and if he is, then a suspension won't be a bad thing for either of us.
But thank you for your contribution to this thread. Whether you know it or not you've introduced an interesting element to the discussion that is worthy of others taking up.