1
   

The upcoming Republican Party convention

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Aug, 2004 06:53 pm
A propos of nothing much at all, this is a description of the Republican Convention back in 1916:

Quote:
The Republican convention has been described as cold. [..] But the sense of brute power was overwhelming, like that of a great monster with little brain which plodded forward and could not be stopped. It was a most representative crowd, representative of a massive and selfish and cynical demand for place. [..] It was the gathering together of distributed privileges, [..] business lawyers, and pillars of society from all over the union. It was the quintessence of all that is commonplace, machine made, complacent and arbitrary in American life. [..]

This brutal fact flowered up into flamboyant oratory. I shall not soon forget the nine and a half hours I sat wedged in, listening to the nominating speeches and subsisting on apple pie and loganberry juice--hours of bellow and rant punctuated by screeches and roars. [..] It was a nightmare, a witches' dance of idiocy and adult hypocrisy. DuPont for instance, and his wonderful grandfather, and the grand old state of Ohio, and the golden state of Iowa, and the flag, red, white and blue, all its stripes, all its stars, and the flag again a thousand times over, and Americanism till your ears ached, [..] and Abraham Lincoln, mauled and dragged about and his name taken in vain and his spirit degraded, prostituted to every insincerity and used as window-dressing for every cheap politician. The incredible sordidness of that convention passes all description. It was a gathering of insanitary callous men, who blasphemed patriotism, made a mockery of Republican government and filled the air with sodden and scheming stupidity.


Then again, there is this description of the Progressive Convention that year:

Quote:
To go from the Republican to the Progressive Convention was to find again the open generosity of a better America. The mass of the delegates there were the most warm hearted crowd I have ever seen. But [..] in 1912 the cant phrase which dominated them was "service." This year the word was " leadership." They have no creed, none whatever. [..] They clung to [their leader] as a woman without occupation or external interests will cling to, her husband. [..] They loved without self respect and without privacy. [..] They took a creed from him which subsequent events showed was not their real creed. They trusted their leaders, but their leaders never trusted them. The delegates never understood what was happening, and it was never fully explained to them.

Anyone wanna play a game of projection here? ;-)

Oh, link
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 09:33 am
nimh

That's delicious! Makes modern writers look like obsequious handmaids. ps...something wrong with link
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 11:38 am
It just goes to show that hyperbole has long been a favorite device of Leftist scribblers, and that Manichaean notions are not confined to the Right.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 11:42 am
Someone has been reading catholic theology
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 12:08 pm
Someone needs to read more than leftist tracts
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 01:17 pm
True. I shall subscribe to 'Gigantic Asses' immediately.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 02:26 pm
You in an angry mood today Finn?
0 Replies
 
Chuckster
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 02:32 pm
Blath! You are'nt doing anything but accosting passerbys as they innocently arrive here. Go check out the latest blockbuster: Kerry and Communist China "marrying breaths"in the form of tons of illegal funding. If you can suppress your Tourette's it might fun to hear your "un-biased" account of yet another floater in the old punch bowl.

"Mountie"? Good Lord!...we took him for the Carpark.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 02:48 pm
"suppress your Tourette's"? I'm pretty sure that's against the TOS...

Meanwhile here's a profile of the GOP convention delegates, courtesy of CBS News::

-- For 55% of Republican delegates, this will be their first convention.

-- 63% say they are conservative, while a third call themselves moderates. A solid 1% describe themselves as liberal. (Among Republican voters nationally, 57% are conservative, 36% are moderates, and 5% are liberal.)

-- A majority of the Republican delegates and voters are Protestant. Two-thirds of the delegates are Protestant, compared to 54% of Republican voters nationally.

-- Moreover, 33% of the Republican delegates are evangelicals. This number is up from 2000, when 27% of the delegates to the Republican convention said they were evangelical or born-again. Just 13% of the delegates to the Democratic convention described themselves as evangelical.

-- 19% of the Republican delegates to the national convention are veterans. 14% of the Democratic delegates said they had served in the Armed Forces. But the proportion of veterans in the Republican delegation this year is down from the 27% of delegates who were veterans four years ago.

-- While the number of delegates who are gun owners (45%) is similar to what it was in 2000, the number of NRA members among the Republican delegation has risen from four years ago. 24% of the 2004 Republican delegates are members of the NRA, compared to 17% in 2000. Among Republican voters, just 12% say they are NRA members.

Anybody watch some of the just-completed march/protest?
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 02:56 pm
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
It just goes to show that hyperbole has long been a favorite device of Leftist scribblers, and that Manichaean notions are not confined to the Right.


ahhh... but perhaps "murdochian" notions are.

http://home.earthlink.net/~hiddensky/murdochian%20candidate%20FINAL%201%20copy.jpg


btw, bltzer interviewed ralph reed this am, who made this week's fave rep comment about the party being "inclusive" and providing a "big tent".

maybe, maybe not. never heard of a "log cabin democrat" though...
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 03:32 pm
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20040829/lthumb.nycz12008292047.cvn_protests_nycz120.jpg

http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20040829/s/r3520499776.jpg

http://us.news1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/rids/20040829/s/r1714801334.jpg
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 03:36 pm
PD

It will be interesting, after the very slim coverage provided the Democrat convention, to see how the 'lberal press' will attend to New York.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 04:28 pm
umbrellas are on the list of items to be confiscated by security at the convention.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 05:13 pm
Quote:
In a smaller protest, police used clubs briefly to disperse a handful of demonstrators holding a "kiss-in" not far from Times Square. There were no immediate details about injuries or arrests.

"There's been a few minor arrests," Mayor Michael Bloomberg said. "It has been peaceful."

Residents leaned from windows along the demonstration route to shout their support. Scattered opposition was visible only around Madison Square Garden, where the GOP convention opens Monday. Some early convention arrivals looked across police lines, shouting at demonstrators: "Go home!"

MSNBC
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 05:15 pm
Club those kissers! No one wants to see that!
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 05:31 pm
nimh wrote:
You in an angry mood today Finn?


No. Why do you ask?
0 Replies
 
swolf
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 06:38 pm
Re: The upcoming Republican Party convention
PDiddie wrote:
http://www.bartcop.com/del-ny.JPG


http://www.sacredcowburgers.com/parodies/a_sensitive_war.jpg


http://namvet6668.net/worried_kerry.gif

http://www.freepgs.com/counterpunch/kerry-swiftvets.jpg


http://pic5.picturetrail.com/VOL92/800445/1417170/63819002.jpg
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 29 Aug, 2004 06:48 pm
What night of the Convention is the Lies and Smears Extravaganza, shewolf?

Got any pictures of Bush's plan for the next four years?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Aug, 2004 02:53 pm
OK, so - the underlying notion of course is silly at best, but still - there apparently are Republicans with a sense of humour! Razz

Quote:
The day's most noteworthy street theater wasn't even the creation of leftists; it was the brainchild of a conservative group calling themselves Communists for Kerry [..]. Dressed as Lenin, Castro, and Che Guevara, and speaking in appropriate Russian and Spanish accents, they marched up Seventh Avenue waving red flags and calling for revolution. (The fact that their display was satire wasn't immediately obvious to some of their fellow marchers.)


And this is more background on the rare phenomenon of Republican street activism:

Quote:
Protest Warriors. Any Republican in New York not safely ensconced inside of Madison Square Garden can find refuge with the Protest Warriors--just look for the signs reading "Hey France, Shut the Hell Up" and "Communism has only killed 100 Million People: Let's Give it Another Chance!" The only major protest group devoted to protesting the protestors, Protest Warriors now has a total membership of 8,000 spread out across the country. Approximately 600 of them are expected to show up for the convention.

Tom Paladrino, the twenty-seven year old leader of the group's New York chapter, is an art director for a major department store--where, he says, amongst a sea of MoveOn.org posters, his desk boasts the only Bush/Cheney 2004 poster. "My biggest problem with conservative political activism is that it didn't really exist," he explained. "Sure, you could join the Young Republicans or something but then you would just sit in a room and talk. It was boring. I wanted to be proactive."

The group's signature approach is coopting the aggressive street tactics traditionally associated with leftist causes. Members snuck into the live audience outside of NBC's "Today" show and briefly held up a sign behind anchor Matt Lauer's head reading "Don't believe the liberal media." Says Paladrino of his group's strategy for engaging left-wing activists: "We aren't just counter-protesting. We mix right in with the rally. We take our signs and get right into the march and debate and argue with the people who are marching." One of the group's more popular signs reads, "War has never solved anything"; in smaller letters below it says, "Except for ending slavery, fascism, Nazism and Communism."

During the convention, which Paladrino describes as the "protest Olympics," the group will confront several of the larger marches and rallies. In addition to their traditional tactics, they will be working with their new spin-off group, Communists for Kerry, which is the right's answer to Billionaires for Bush. "The left shouldn't have a monopoly on street theater," Paladrino says. "This is the information age and we need to compete. We need to be in people's faces."
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 30 Aug, 2004 02:55 pm
Hilarious!

And MEANINGFUL!

LOL!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 12:11:36