I have never said no one should have guns. I have only pointed out that the argument that IF no one had guns, people would instantly resort to bombs and bombs are more devastating is a bull **** argument. Most people couldn't build a bomb and most shootings aren't planned with enough time to build a bomb.
I didn't realize it was children that were going to school at a community college. Perhaps you could tell me what you think the age for children is in your view.
People without guns are not defenseless. There are many ways to defend oneself without a gun. IF we accept the argument that knives and bombs are just as deadly if not more deadly than guns would leave us with both of those as defensive weapons equal to guns.
Repeating your misrepresentation still doesn't make it my argument.
Which laws are those? I don't recall advocating any specific "common sense" gun laws. I have only pointed out that Bill and Oralloy's arguments are bull **** when they argue about guns and knives.
Do you ever add anything of substance to a post or do you just fling **** like a monkey?
Just repeat what someone else says, how original. Rab has a point though, you are a liar. We all know that, remember when you were caught posting more than one identity. You claimed, as you always did, that we'd misunderstood what you'd said. (That happens to you a lot doesn't it. One heck of a lot.)
Anyone you claimed one id was not yours, but another poster, lets call him Mo from the Mikado. Then someone else who'd actually met Mo called you out.
I don't know what you were trying to pull, and I don't want to know, but you failed miserably. You lied. I'm not going to forget that, and neither, it would appear, is Rab.
we all know that Izzy is a leader .
This is a crutch for the closed and feeble minded, and we all know that Izzy is a leader in that group.
3. I stated knives and bombs are self defense weapons IF we accept the argument that they are as deadly as guns. (You have completely changed my meaning to make your argument.)