@FBM,
FBM wrote:Hmm. OK, there are already expensive licensing requirements for owning fully automatic weapons. Suppose handguns and non-hunting long guns were simply bumped up to that class? After all, it's a lot harder to sneak a 30.06 onto campus or into a theater. Just speculating.
If onerous requirements for owning full-auto weapons pass Constitutional muster, it is because such weapons are unsuitable for self defense.
Any measure that would place handguns out of reach of ordinary citizens would violate our Constitutional right to carry a handgun whenever we go about in public.
Any measure that would place assault rifles out of reach of ordinary citizens would be unconstitutional because there is no good reason to restrict harmless cosmetic features like a pistol grip on a rifle.