Walter writes
Quote:I think the shooting on the car carrying an Italian journalist who had just been freed by kidnappers last night, injuring the woman and killing an Italian secret service agent who tried to protect her., belongs more to the unexpected and not so wonderful things because all is over, Fox?
Note to Revel: I would imagine most anti-war people would say they have never supported the terrorists. But motive and appearance are not mutually compatible when it comes to media. When the media projects mostly a negative opinion of the administration, military, activities, the 'occupation' along with statements that the terrorists are just insurgents protesting an unwelcome occupation, etc., it looks very much like sympathies are with the terrorists. Posts on message boards, also accessed by the enemy, can look the same way.
Take the unfortunate shooting of the Italian reporter. The account reported objectively indicates the car was speeding toward the checkpoint and was ordered to stop, flagged, waved off. When there was no response, the guards had no choice but to shoot rather than risk still another car bomb exploding in their faces. When they realized the occupants were friends, not foe, they rushed the wounded to the hospital and expressed profound sorrow and regret over the one death. Now that is the way it should have been reported. No thinking person would believe U.S. soldiers would intentionally shoot civilian allies, and I do not for a minute believe the Italian government is made up of unthiking people.
Now compare that with the story Walter posted, obviously intended to be sensational, appearance of a major rift with Italy, yadda yadda. It is reported almost gleefully. I'm not saying Walter is intending to be inflammatory, but the media is wanting to make this look as bad as it possibly can with maximum negative ramifications for the U.S. It is irresponsible and reprehensible.