revel wrote: not till they ask us to
not unless they ask us to
before the war one didn't have one thing to do with another, now it may be a different story, unless of course the outside terrorist follow us wherever the administration takes us next.
I think war should [NOT?]be necessary and freeing others from dictators is not practical because you can't free everybody.
Do you have proof that any of the so called bad articles are false? If so which ones and how are they false? (Actual proof please, not just observations. )
Thank you for answering all five of my questions.
As you already know, regardless of what the administration thought or thinks (or is alleged to have thought or to think),
I thought and think the invasion of Iraq was/is a major step toward solving the worldwide terrorist problem: East, West, and Middle East. I perceived the al Qaeda base established in Iraq in 2001 to be an even greater growing threat to the US than was the al Qaeda base established in Afghanistan in 1988. Saddam's regime had a far greater weapons and munitions cache available to support al Qaeda terrorist activities than the Taliban ever had.
Also, I don't buy the argument that if one can't save
all then one should not try to save
some.
Over a week ago, I posted to you some of the evidence I had, besides Rather-blather, that I think supports my contention that ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, NYT, BG, WP, and LAT are not trustworthy news sources. If you can't find that post let me know and I'll look for it. The most recent example in 2005, that I gave you was CNN's
now former news chief
now admitted false allegation that reporters in Iraq were being targeted by our soldiers in Iraq. That news chief was the same one who agreed on or before 1990 not to disclose Saddam regime atrocities in return for remaining in Iraq.
revel wrote: btw-the word, "infer" is getting old.
I use the word
infer to express my significant uncertainty regarding whether my assertion that follows the use of that word is true or not. For example, I infer from your btw-statement that my continued use of the word
infer will annoy you. While I do not wish to annoy you and hope I am wrong about it annoying you, I will nonetheless continue my use of the word
infer when I think it an appropriately simple way to express my significant uncertainty.
from this comment that you think I am an independent with a brain of my own only when I post things you agree with. I in turn infer from that you generally think me a stupid fool. I in turn infer from that you are a poor judge of people.
]
