0
   

THE US, THE UN AND THE IRAQIS THEMSELVES, V. 7.0

 
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 12:59 pm
At least Ican made me smile with Capire...
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:05 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
As Frank has said, democracy does not come from without.
Frank is wrong and so are you. Where do you guys get that stuff?

Tell the Japanese and the Germans that a democracy cannot come from without. The Japanese who never previously had a democracy, had a democracy imposed on them by a conquerer, namely the US. The Japanese have had that democracy over 50 years.

The Germans who previously had a democracy for less than 15 years (which was imposed by its WWI armistice agreement) before they had a dictatorship, had a democracy imposed on them by a conquerer, namely the US and its allies. The Germans have had that democracy over 50 years.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:10 pm
I think the American public can still stomach more American deaths. We haven't reached our threshold. We really don't care how many Iraqis are slaughtered.

The key lies in getting pro-occupation Iraqis--and the Iraqis will "vote" (overwhelmingly, even) to keep us there--to fight the anti-occupation Iraqis, leaving our forces mostly out of the fighting, limiting our involvement to more of a back-up role.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:11 pm
The Western Powers have been trying to install a democracy in Iraq since 1914...an abject failure. So what's your point?
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:12 pm
Frank said (in part):

Quote:
Iraq needs a strongman to run it. The factions there have about as much chance of getting along well enough to run a country as the Israelis and Palestinians do.


Frank, there is another way to deal with Iraq, different from the stay or leave options: Send another 100,000 troops to Iraq, including specialists in every kind of country-rebuilding skill, and including troops trained in security and policing to lock down the country. Then put a strongman in charge. Call him what you want: viceroy, king, emperor. Give him a cadre of councillors to advise and help him, all locals, but he is the high honcho. He will run the country until democratic institutions can be put in place and until local police and a national army can be trained.

We can help pay for the additional forces and their materiel by cancelling the lavish triumphalist inauguration and telecasting a brief ceremony from the White House.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:14 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Frank,

TERRORIST POKER AIN'T YOUR FATHER'S POKER

Your father's poker, whether it be standard poker, WWII poker, or Vietnam poker, is significantly different from terrorist poker.

In standard poker, if you choose not to sit at the table (i.e., play), you at worst lose a chance to win some money and at best lose the chance to not lose some money.

In WWII poker, it is necessary to sit at the table until you win and replace your belligerent opponents with non-belligerent opponents or your belligerent opponents win and enslave you.

In Vietnam poker, if you choose not to sit at the table, you at worst lose the life of another player, and at best do not lose your own life.

In terrorist poker, if you choose not to sit at the table, you lose your life. If you lose this poker game, you lose your life. If you win this poker game you replace all your terrorist harboring opponents with non-terrorist harboring opponents, and thereby, win and save your life. If you refuse to bet on the hands you are dealt, you risk losing the game and your life. If you do bet on the hands you are dealt, you at worst lose the game and your life, and at best win the game and your life. In short, in terrorist poker you have only two choices: either you win and live, or you lose and die.

Capire?


Yeah...I know. You guys know best.

This is the biggest f**k up ever.

To George Bush...I would say...don't just do something...sit there....because "sitting there" is a hell of a lot better than what you are doing.

But I know...you conservatives think that because you can identify a problem...the idiotic solutions you offer are always the only solutions.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:15 pm
PDiddie wrote:
That's the fattest, stupidest strawman you've constructed yet.


No it is not, PD...he has constructed strawmen that have been much fatter and much more stupid.

But I get your point! :wink:
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:16 pm
McTag wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:

We asked them to do it on their own a while back.

We asked them to rise up against Saddam...throw him out...and build a democracy.

Now we cannot trust them to do it because we have destroyed their country.


Frank, I cannot argue with you as well! Smile And I agree with part of your last post.

The point I would make to this bit is, we asked them to rise up against Saddam before, and they did rise up, and the expected help was not forthcoming, and thousands of the rebels were executed by Saddam's men.


What a bizarre thing for people who don't want freedom and democracy to do in the first place, eh? Who here doubts the silent majority was secretly pulling for that change? It is utter moral bankruptcy to allow yourself to be convinced that a majority of people anywhere wouldn't prefer the freedom of self-determination if given an option. As Ican stated earlier, that's a form of bigotry. To assume that Iraqis neither want self-determination, nor are capable of dealing with it, is as absurd as it is obscene. This bigotry is the foundation of Frank's objection. Frank states "Iraq needs a strongman to run it.", as if Saddam was the better solution, because "The factions there have about as much chance of getting along well enough to run a country as the Israelis and Palestinians do."

This is akin to those who said the North and South in this country would never agree on the slavery issue, so its best to pretend it doesn't exist and allow the injustice to continue. Certainly less Yankee blood would have been shed if we simply continued to ignore it. Even in this land of the free, we once feared that the cost of fighting those who would oppose freedom for all, outweighed the potential good of doing so. To hell with the human rights of the few, for the benefit of the many, right? The prospect of failure once loomed so heavily that in 1836 Congress actually passed a resolution (Gag Rule) that automatically postponed action on all petitions relating to slavery (freedom) without even hearing them. It took 8 years for that order to be lifted.

It turns out; the doom-criers were not entirely incorrect. It took the bloodiest fight in American history to finally grant freedom to ALL of her citizens. And, when the fight was finally over, the fight was hardly over. Nearly 150 years later there remains pockets of resistance that continue to fight to this day. Where the country was once split down the middle, with brother fighting brother, today we would stand together as one against the enemies of freedom. At least, that is, if it's American freedom at stake. Who gives a sh!t about Iraq?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:24 pm
InfraBlue wrote:
We really don't care how many Iraqis are slaughtered.
More Bunk! Did you care how many Iraqis were being slaughtered by Saddam's regime? Do you care how many Iraqis are being slaughtered by the deposed Baathists trying to regain their power so they can resume their slaughter of Iraqis?

More important than what either of us thinks is what the Iraqis themselves think. All they have to do is hold one election and then have their elected government tell us to leave or stay. The American public will demand that American troops leave the moment the any Iraqi government tells us to leave, and the American troops will definitely leave, whether the American administration wants to leave or not.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:28 pm
We will see what we will see.

I truly hope you people are right...but every fiber of my body says that you are dead wrong.

I see a horror show here that will pale what happened to us in Vietnam.

I see this as yet one more instance of American conservatism stinking up our planet.


We shall see.


In the meantime, though, I will speak out against our further occupation of Iraq...and I will continue to warn that most of what is being done right now is making things worse...not better.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:30 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
PDiddie wrote:
That's the fattest, stupidest strawman you've constructed yet.
No it is not, PD...he has constructed strawmen that have been much fatter and much more stupid.
But I get your point! :wink:
Laughing Same 'ol Frank. When you lack the ability to provide a rational rebuttal you resort to cheap dump. PDiddie's response while expected is the same cheap dump.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:30 pm
There is no shame in adhering to one's principles...and that goes for both sides of the aisle...Merry Christmas...may the next one be full of peace...
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:31 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
PDiddie wrote:
That's the fattest, stupidest strawman you've constructed yet.
No it is not, PD...he has constructed strawmen that have been much fatter and much more stupid.
But I get your point! :wink:
Laughing Same 'ol Frank. When you lack the ability to provide a rational rebuttal you resort to cheap dump. PDiddie's response while expected is the same cheap dump.


It wasn't that cheap...and in your case, I was more than willing to make it.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:41 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
I will continue to warn that most of what is being done right now is making things worse...not better.
Perhaps you're right, perhaps not. But if "what is being done right now" is actually making things worse, then we can and will correct it. While the critics moan and groan, cuss and fuss, and snarl and quarrel, and reveal their startling degree of incompetence to understand the real problem and how to solve it, others are standing up and taking the chances necessary to really find a solution.
0 Replies
 
cavfancier
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 01:47 pm
I am no Latin scholar, but I did discover that the cognate version of "capere" is "caber." Anyone familar with Celtic sport knows of the caber toss, where giant tree trunks are thrown into the air, and where they land, nobody knows. Whoever manages to toss the trunk further wins the game, I believe.

More interesting linguistic info:

"Internal Accusative: Another important usage for the accusative case is the Internal Accusative. The Internal Accusative is any accusative that names or modifies the action of the verb. The Cognate Accusative is the easiest form of the internal accusative to identify; it is called a "cognate accusative" because the noun in the accusative case uses a same linguistic stem or root as (in other words, it is cognate with) the stem or root of the verb. I sing a song = intransitive verb, "I sing", + accusative that simply renames the activity of singing, "a song." This cognate (internal) accusative can be modified by adjectives: I sing a loud song. But notice what happens if we leave off the noun: I sing loud. Suddenly, the adjective becomes an adverb (the very adverb our third grade teachers told us not to use). This "adverbial accusative" is almost always an "internal accusative" -- that is, an accusative object that renames the action of the verb, even when it is not in any way a cognate accusative. Consider: cano nihil = I sing no song = I don't sing. loquitur multum = he talks much talking = he talks a lot. Thus, you can have a transitive verb ("Im gonna hit your face" = ego faciem tuam icturus sum) with an internal accusative (ego faciem istam multum percussurus sum. = "I'm gonna hit your face big-time" or "I'm gonna smash your face" or "I'm gonna hit your face a lot.")."

Merry Christmas all, happy holidays, let's hope for a better, more understanding world next year. :wink:
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 02:02 pm
MORE ON THE REAL TERRORIST POKER GAME

BIN LADEN'S FATWA--1996

Quote:
The following text is a fatwa, or declaration of war, by Osama bin Laden first published in Al Quds Al Arabi, a London-based newspaper, in August, 1996. The fatwa is entitled "Declaration of War against the Americans Occupying the Land of the Two Holy Places."
...
Few days ago the news agencies had reported that the Defence Secretary of the Crusading Americans had said that "the explosion at Riyadh and Al-Khobar had taught him one lesson: that is not to withdraw when attacked by coward terrorists".

We say to the Defence Secretary that his talk can induce a grieving mother to laughter! and shows the fears that had enshrined you all. Where was this false courage of yours when the explosion in Beirut took place on 1983 AD (1403 A.H). You were turned into scattered pits and pieces at that time; 241 mainly marines solders were killed. And where was this courage of yours when two explosions made you to leave Aden in lees than twenty four hours!

But your most disgraceful case was in Somalia; where- after vigorous propaganda about the power of the USA and its post cold war leadership of the new world order- you moved tens of thousands of international force, including twenty eight thousands American solders into Somalia. However, when tens of your solders were killed in minor battles and one American Pilot was dragged in the streets of Mogadishu you left the area carrying disappointment, humiliation, defeat and your dead with you. Clinton appeared in front of the whole world threatening and promising revenge , but these threats were merely a preparation for withdrawal. You have been disgraced by Allah and you withdrew; the extent of your impotence and weaknesses became very clear. It was a pleasure for the "heart" of every Muslim and a remedy to the "chests" of believing nations to see you defeated in the three Islamic cities of Beirut , Aden and Mogadishu.

I say to Secretary of Defence: The sons of the land of the two Holy Places had come out to fight against the Russian in Afghanistan, the Serb in Bosnia-Herzegovina and today they are fighting in Chechenia and -by the Permission of Allah- they have been made victorious over your partner, the Russians. By the command of Allah, they are also fighting in Tajakistan.

I say: Since the sons of the land of the two Holy Places feel and strongly believe that fighting (Jihad) against the Kuffar in every part of the world, is absolutely essential; then they would be even more enthusiastic, more powerful and larger in number upon fighting on their own land- the place of their births- defending the greatest of their sanctities, the noble Ka'ba (the Qiblah of all Muslims). They know that the Muslims of the world will assist and help them to victory. To liberate their sanctities is the greatest of issues concerning all Muslims; It is the duty of every Muslims in this world.

I say to you William (Defence Secretary) that: These youths love death as you loves life. They inherit dignity, pride, courage, generosity, truthfulness and sacrifice from father to father. They are most delivering and steadfast at war. They inherit these values from their ancestors (even from the time of the Jaheliyyah, before Islam). These values were approved and completed by the arriving Islam as stated by the messenger of Allah (Allah's Blessings and Salutations may be on him): "I have been send to perfecting the good values". (Saheeh Al-Jame' As-Sagheer).
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 02:07 pm
Japan and Germany "surrendered." You ain't gonna find terrorists surrendering. Quit equating Japan and Germany with Iraq; there's no comparison.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 02:13 pm
SOME MORE ON THE REAL TERRORIST POKER GAME



OSAMA'S FATWA--1998

[boldface added by me]

Quote:
Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders
World Islamic Front Statement
23 February 1998
Shaykh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Ladin
Ayman al-Zawahiri, amir of the Jihad Group in Egypt
Abu-Yasir Rifa'i Ahmad Taha, Egyptian Islamic Group
Shaykh Mir Hamzah, secretary of the Jamiat-ul-Ulema-e-Pakistan
Fazlur Rahman, amir of the Jihad Movement in Bangladesh

Quote:
Praise be to Allah, who revealed the Book, controls the clouds, defeats factionalism, and says in His Book: "But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the pagans wherever ye find them, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war)"; and peace be upon our Prophet, Muhammad Bin-'Abdallah, who said: I have been sent with the sword between my hands to ensure that no one but Allah is worshipped, Allah who put my livelihood under the shadow of my spear and who inflicts humiliation and scorn on those who disobey my orders.

The Arabian Peninsula has never -- since Allah made it flat, created its desert, and encircled it with seas -- been stormed by any forces like the crusader armies spreading in it like locusts, eating its riches and wiping out its plantations. All this is happening at a time in which nations are attacking Muslims like people fighting over a plate of food. In the light of the grave situation and the lack of support, we and you are obliged to discuss current events, and we should all agree on how to settle the matter.

No one argues today about three facts that are known to everyone; we will list them, in order to remind everyone:
First, for over seven years the United States has been occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its riches, dictating to its rulers, humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors, and turning its bases in the Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight the neighboring Muslim peoples.

If some people have in the past argued about the fact of the occupation, all the people of the Peninsula have now acknowledged it. The best proof of this is the Americans' continuing aggression against the Iraqi people using the Peninsula as a staging post, even though all its rulers are against their territories being used to that end, but they are helpless.

Second, despite the great devastation inflicted on the Iraqi people by the crusader-Zionist alliance, and despite the huge number of those killed, which has exceeded 1 million... despite all this, the Americans are once against trying to repeat the horrific massacres, as though they are not content with the protracted blockade imposed after the ferocious war or the fragmentation and devastation. So here they come to annihilate what is left of this people and to humiliate their Muslim neighbors.

Third, if the Americans' aims behind these wars are religious and economic, the aim is also to serve the Jews' petty state and divert attention from its occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there. The best proof of this is their eagerness to destroy Iraq, the strongest neighboring Arab state, and their endeavor to fragment all the states of the region such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Sudan into paper statelets and through their disunion and weakness to guarantee Israel's survival and the continuation of the brutal crusade occupation of the Peninsula.

All these crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on Allah, his messenger, and Muslims. And ulema have throughout Islamic history unanimously agreed that the jihad is an individual duty if the enemy destroys the Muslim countries. This was revealed by Imam Bin-Qadamah in "Al- Mughni," Imam al-Kisa'i in "Al-Bada'i," al-Qurtubi in his interpretation, and the shaykh of al-Islam in his books, where he said: "As for the fighting to repulse [an enemy], it is aimed at defending sanctity and religion, and it is a duty as agreed [by the ulema]. Nothing is more sacred than belief except repulsing an enemy who is attacking religion and life."

On that basis, and in compliance with Allah's order, we issue the following fatwa to all Muslims:
The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies -- civilians and military -- is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque [Mecca] from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty Allah, "and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah."

This is in addition to the words of Almighty Allah: "And why should ye not fight in the cause of Allah and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)? -- women and children, whose cry is: 'Our Lord, rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from thee one who will help!'"

We -- with Allah's help -- call on every Muslim who believes in Allah and wishes to be rewarded to comply with Allah's order to kill the Americans and plunder their money wherever and whenever they find it. We also call on Muslim ulema, leaders, youths, and soldiers to launch the raid on Satan's U.S. troops and the devil's supporters allying with them, and to displace those who are behind them so that they may learn a lesson.

Almighty Allah said: "O ye who believe, give your response to Allah and His Apostle, when He calleth you to that which will give you life. And know that Allah cometh between a man and his heart, and that it is He to whom ye shall all be gathered."

Almighty Allah also says: "O ye who believe, what is the matter with you, that when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling so heavily to the earth! Do ye prefer the life of this world to the hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place; but Him ye would not harm in the least. For Allah hath power over all things."

Almighty Allah also says: "So lose no heart, nor fall into despair. For ye must gain mastery if ye are true in faith."


Some say: No "connection" between Saddam and Osama? Based on this and much other evidence, I think they were virtually "in bed together".
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 02:29 pm
AND SOME MORE ON THE REAL TERRORIST POKER GAME

[boldface added by me]

Al-Qaida Statement Warning Muslims Against Associating With The Crusaders And Idols

Jun 09, 2004
...

Quote:
All praises be to Allah and peace be upon His messenger, Prophet Muhammad, his families, companions and whoever follows:

Once again, we repeat our call and send this clear message to our Muslim brothers, warning against fellowship with the Crusaders, the Americans, Westerners and all idols in the Arab Gulf. Muslims should not associate with them anywhere, be it in their homes, complexes or travel with them by any means of transportation.

Prophet Muhammad said "I am free from who lives among idols".

No Muslim should risk his life as he may inadvertently be killed if he associates with the Crusaders, whom we have no choice but to kill.

Everything related to them such as complexes, bases, means of transportation, especially Western and American Airlines, will be our main and direct targets in our forthcoming operations on our path of Jihad that we, with Allah's Power, will not turn away from.

We confirm and repeat this statement in support of the Ummah (Islam nation), caring for our Muslim brothers' blood for who we undertake these operations, to defend them, their religion, honor and lands and to be free from those who disobey Allah's Orders and continue to live with the Crusaders thereby gaining an evil omen.

We further repeat our warning to the officials and those who guard the American complexes and who stand with America and its hired help, who takes up arms against the Mujahideen for defending for them and their interests such as the Saudi government and others who choose to support the idol’s regime over the Islamic one. We call them to repent, separate and to hate idols by fighting them with money, tongues and arms.

Our prayer to Allah is that we may assist His religion and spread His word and we ask to be given His enemies. Allah alone is sufficient and the end belongs to the pious believers. There is no aggression except upon oppressors. Praise be to Allah is our last worship.

Al-Qaida Organization of the Arab Gulf
19 Rabbi Al-Akhir 1425
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 24 Dec, 2004 02:36 pm
THE 9-11 COMMISSION ON THE REAL TERRORIST POKER GAME

www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
Quote:
2 THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM
2.1 A DECLARATION OF WAR
In February 1998, the 40-year-old Saudi exile Usama Bin Ladin and a fugitive Egyptian physician, Ayman al Zawahiri, arranged from their Afghan headquarters for an Arabic newspaper in London to publish what they termed a fatwa issued in the name of a "World Islamic Front." A fatwa is normally an interpretation of Islamic law by a respected Islamic authority, but neither Bin Ladin, Zawahiri, nor the three others who signed this statement were scholars of Islamic law. Claiming that America had declared war against God and his messenger, they called for the murder of any American, anywhere on earth, as the "individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it."1

Three months later, when interviewed in Afghanistan by ABC-TV, Bin Ladin enlarged on these themes.2 He claimed it was more important for Muslims to kill Americans than to kill other infidels. "It is far better for anyone to kill a single American soldier than to squander his efforts on other activities," he said. Asked whether he approved of terrorism and of attacks on civilians, he replied: "We believe that the worst thieves in the world today and the worst terrorists are the Americans. Nothing could stop you except perhaps retaliation in kind. We do not have to differentiate between military or civilian. As far as we are concerned, they are all targets."

Though novel for its open endorsement of indiscriminate killing, Bin Ladin's 1998 declaration was only the latest in the long series of his public and private calls since 1992 that singled out the United States for attack.
In August 1996, Bin Ladin had issued his own self-styled fatwa calling on Muslims to drive American soldiers out of Saudi Arabia. The long, disjointed document condemned the Saudi monarchy for allowing the presence of an army of infidels in a land with the sites most sacred to Islam, and celebrated recent suicide bombings of American military facilities in the Kingdom. It praised the 1983 suicide bombing in Beirut that killed 241 U.S. Marines, the 1992 bombing in Aden, and especially the 1993 firefight in Somalia after which the United States "left the area carrying disappointment, humiliation, defeat and your dead with you."3

Bin Ladin said in his ABC interview that he and his followers had been preparing in Somalia for another long struggle, like that against the Soviets in Afghanistan, but "the United States rushed out of Somalia in shame and disgrace." Citing the Soviet army's withdrawal from Afghanistan as proof that a ragged army of dedicated Muslims could overcome a superpower, he told the interviewer: "We are certain that we shall-with the grace of Allah-prevail over the Americans." He went on to warn that "If the present injustice continues . . . , it will inevitably move the battle to American soil."4

Plans to attack the United States were developed with unwavering single-mindedness throughout the 1990s. Bin Ladin saw himself as called "to follow in the footsteps of the Messenger and to communicate his message to all nations,"5 and to serve as the rallying point and organizer of a new kind of war to destroy America and bring the world to Islam.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 08/19/2025 at 10:15:43