McTag wrote:Frank Apisa wrote:
We asked them to do it on their own a while back.
We asked them to rise up against Saddam...throw him out...and build a democracy.
Now we cannot trust them to do it because we have destroyed their country.
Frank, I cannot argue with you as well!

And I agree with part of your last post.
The point I would make to this bit is, we asked them to rise up against Saddam before, and they did rise up, and the expected help was not forthcoming, and thousands of the rebels were executed by Saddam's men.
What a bizarre thing for people who don't want freedom and democracy to do in the first place, eh? Who here doubts the silent majority was secretly pulling for that change? It is utter moral bankruptcy to allow yourself to be convinced that a majority of people
anywhere wouldn't prefer the freedom of self-determination if given an option. As Ican stated earlier, that's a form of bigotry. To assume that Iraqis neither want self-determination, nor are capable of dealing with it, is as absurd as it is obscene. This bigotry is the foundation of Frank's objection. Frank states "Iraq needs a strongman to run it.", as if Saddam was the better solution, because "The factions there have about as much chance of getting along well enough to run a country as the Israelis and Palestinians do."
This is akin to those who said the North and South in this country would never agree on the slavery
issue, so its best to pretend it doesn't exist and allow the injustice to continue. Certainly less Yankee blood would have been shed if we simply continued to ignore it. Even in this
land of the free, we once feared that the cost of fighting those who would oppose freedom for all, outweighed the potential good of doing so. To hell with the human rights of the few, for the benefit of the many, right? The prospect of failure once loomed so heavily that in 1836 Congress actually passed a resolution (Gag Rule) that automatically postponed action on all petitions relating to slavery (freedom) without even hearing them. It took 8 years for that order to be lifted.
It turns out; the doom-criers were not entirely incorrect. It took the bloodiest fight in American history to finally grant freedom to ALL of her citizens. And, when the fight was finally over, the fight was hardly over. Nearly 150 years later there remains pockets of resistance that continue to fight to this day. Where the country was once split down the middle, with brother fighting brother, today we would stand together as one against the enemies of freedom. At least, that is, if it's American freedom at stake. Who gives a sh!t about Iraq?