DontTreadOnMe wrote: right.... so then we can look forward to toppling the following for starters;
pakistan
iran
syria
chechnya
the phillipines
suadi arabia
sudan
katar
uae
north ireland
... US ...
I thought everyone understood the obvious difference between al Qaeda located in a country
whose government is working to remove and keep them out, and al Qaeda located in a country
whose government is working to harbor them and bring them in.
Again,
a wise person attempts to remove those governments that harbor and bring in al Qaeda. It is a realistic expectation that if one does that to enough such governments, few if any other governments will harbor and bring in al Qaeda. Perhaps the governments of Syria and Iran will also have to be removed before all of al Qaeda are finally under attack by the governments of every country.[/quote]
Perhaps I'm wrong, but I thought Afganistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Phillipines, North Ireland, Sudan, and US governments are all working to remove and keep out al Qaeda. Whereas the Iranian, and Syrian governments are both working to harbor and bring in al Qaeda. I'm not adequately informed whether the Chechnya, Katar, and UAE governments are currently working to remove and keep out, or working to harbor and bring in al Qaeda.
DontTreadOnMe wrote: ican, it's not unwise to enforce the existing laws regarding border control. it is unwise to continue soft handling the borders in order to allow illegals to stream across the border to supply cheap and submissive labor.
We are currently enforcing US immigration laws by returning illegal immigrants captured in the act of entering the US, back where they came from. That isn't working well. Nor should any rational person think that such a method would work well. Suppose say 100,000 of the same people try to illegally imigrate into the US each and every month. How many months will it take for say 99% of those illegal imigrants to succeed, if the US continues its present method of
capture and return, of say 50% per month? The answer is 7 months. Then suppose another 100,000 try it over the next 7 months ... ?
Those that succeed in getting past our border guards are legally rewarded with driver's licences, healthcare, and other welfare benefits. Perhaps we ought to stop those rewards.
An unwise person puts up
walls to keep al Qaeda away from the civilians al Qaeda wants to murder (e.g., an unwise person hides in
closets). Historically, such
walls have proven to be expensive to build and maintain, ineffective, and relatively easy to circumvent, tunnel under, blast through, or in some cases of decay simply walk through. Worse, the civilians al Qaeda wants to murder cannot survive huddled behind such
walls, because to survive those civilians must make their bread and earn their bread in places that either don't have
walls or cannot afford
walls.[/quote]