0
   

THE US, THE UN AND THE IRAQIS THEMSELVES, V. 7.0

 
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 07:47 pm
InfraBlue wrote:
So ican, ... I have not come across anything that has unsubstantiated the evidence I've referred to, or discredited the sources thereof.
Laughing Aah, but what evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof Question
Rolling Eyes

Witness: I have substantiated evidence from accredited sources that Bush is no damn good.

Bush's Defense Attorney: What evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof?

Witness: I have not come across anything that has unsubstantiated the evidence I've referred to, or discredited the sources thereof.

Bush's Defense Attorney: What evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof Question
Rolling Eyes

NASA Scientist: I have substantiated evidence from accredited sources that life more intelligent than human life exists elsewhere in the universe.

NASA Chief: What evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof?

NASA Scientist: I have not come across anything that has unsubstantiated the evidence I've referred to, or discredited the sources thereof.

NASA Chief: What evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof Question
Rolling Eyes

Cleric: I have substantiated evidence from accredited sources that God exists in the universe.

Layman: What evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof?

Cleric: I have not come across anything that has unsubstantiated the evidence I've referred to, or discredited the sources thereof.

Layman: What evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof Question
Rolling Eyes

Salesman: I have substantiated evidence from accredited sources this airplane is airworthy.

Aviator: What evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof?

Salesman: I have not come across anything that has unsubstantiated the evidence I've referred to, or discredited the sources thereof.

Aviator: What evidence have you come across that substantiates the evidence you have referred to or accredits the sources thereof Question
Crying or Very sad

Now please review my post:
1075958:

By the way, just for you, that post does not even mention the 9-11CR quote:

"There are indications that by then the Iraqi regime tolerated and may even have helped Ansar al Islam against the common Kurdish enemy.54"
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 07:53 pm
InfraBlue wrote:
So ican, ... I have not come across anything that has unsubstantiated the evidence I've referred to, or discredited the sources thereof.
Laughing

Not anyting Question Not anyting at all? Not even one little weensie ting?

"There are indications that by then the Iraqi regime tolerated and may even have helped Ansar al Islam against the common Kurdish enemy.54" Smile

Ain't that sumpin'?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 08:39 pm
DontTreadOnMe wrote:
australia wrote:
You can't attack terrorists. That was what was ingenious about the bombing. Who do you attack back? If it was a country, then attack them, but it wasn't, it was groups here and there, cells here, sleepers there. You are fighting an invisible enemy who think nothing of giving their life away.


then why the g.d. hell are so intent on backing the war in iraq. you are saying the exact same thing i have been saying for 3 bloody years !

jesus! al qaida is a "shadow army".

one more time... we are fighting spies and and sabateurs. we have to fight them with the same... and guard the freaking borders.

dammit. this soooo frustrating.
Good Defense versus Good Offense; that is the question.

The Maginot Line versus a strong and ready counter attacking military?

A wise person attempts to remove those governments that harbor al Qaeda with the realistic expectation that if one does that to enough such governments, few if any such governments will harbor them. If few if any such governments harbor al Qaeda they will either cease to be effective or cease to exist. But such an approach requires far more patience than hiding in a closet. Also it is far more time consuming and expensive in lives and money than hiding in a closet.

An unwise person puts up walls to keep al Qaeda away from the civilians al Qaeda wants to murder (i.e., hides in closets). Historically, such walls have proven to be expensive to build and maintain, ineffective, and relatively easy to circumvent, tunnel under, or blast through. Worse, the citizens al Qaeda wants to murder cannot survive huddled behind walls, because to survive they must make their bread and earn their bread in places that either don't have walls or cannot afford walls.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 08:51 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
:wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
Hello again! May you have a Merry secular Christmas and a Happy New Year. :wink:
0 Replies
 
australia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:04 pm
There has so far only been 457 pages on this topic. Very dissappointing. I would have thought easily 500 pages before christmas.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:13 pm
um australia this is editon 7 the pages run well into the 1,000's
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:13 pm
australia wrote:
There has so far only been 457 pages on this topic. Very dissappointing. I would have thought easily 500 pages before christmas.
Take a look at the 7.0 in the title. There are 6 other chapters before this one. :wink:
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:14 pm
australia wrote:
There has so far only been 457 pages on this topic. Very dissappointing. I would have thought easily 500 pages before christmas.

Remember this is the 7th incarnation of this thread. While the others aren't as long as this one, they still count.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:15 pm
snap snap snap
0 Replies
 
australia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:18 pm
Phew! For a minute there I thought there was the possibility that there might be a 1% discussion of other countries.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:21 pm
Dys cheated... no quote.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:23 pm
australia wrote:
Phew! For a minute there I thought there was the possibility that there might be a 1% discussion of other countries.
Let's see! Four days until midnight Xmas eve. We're now on page 458. Only 42 pages to go. Less than 11 pages per day. Now that Frank is here we got it made. 500 here we come! Smile
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:34 pm
Bush is moron
ok Frank's taken care of.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:35 pm
Oh, and Frank says Bush is still a moron.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:36 pm
Frank is neither an atheist nor a liberal. (I am both)
0 Replies
 
australia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:38 pm
thats it! Keep it going! only 10 pages a day is all we need.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:39 pm
Frank told me to tell you "Bush is a moron"
0 Replies
 
australia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:43 pm
We need gungasnake and his evolution theories. It would hit 500 in no time.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 09:44 pm
Interestingly enough, I just noticed that I got a PM from Frank earlier. He said Bush is a moron.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Dec, 2004 11:22 pm
ican wrote:
Ain't that sumpin'?


Yeah, a self-admittedly poor source of evidence.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 08/17/2025 at 01:45:01