Bernie's In

@RABEL222,

Quote:

Yes! Trump will try to make his businesses the only ones the government can do business with. He is in it for the money, like Trump university.

I think you may be correct because of Trump's wolf mentality but Hillary seems to be a wolf in sheep's clothing to me.

I so little difference in the two.

0 Replies

Do any of you like listing to intellectual black men?

0 Replies

Do any of you remember this old acoustic song?

0 Replies

@reasoning logic,

reasoning logic wrote:

Quote:

I haven't seen a Bernie post on my facebook feed in weeks. I call BS

Are most of your friends on Facebook Bernie supporters or do you isolate yourself from those type of people? Maybe they isolate themselves from you?

Or maybe (just maybe - work with me here), Bernie is just not a priority in growing numbers of conversations.

1 Reply

@snood,

Quote:

Or maybe (just maybe - work with me here), Bernie is just not a priority in growing numbers of conversations.

As I get older I become more forgetful, Would you please remind me who this conversation is about?

1 Reply

@reasoning logic,

reasoning logic wrote:

Quote:
Or maybe (just maybe - work with me here), Bernie is just not a priority in growing numbers of conversations.

As I get older I become more forgetful, Would you please remind me who this conversation is about?

Oh, you made a funny - good for you! Yes, this "conversation" is about Bernie. In fact it even bears a title with his name. But this part of this conversation about Bernie was about how Bernie is becoming less preeminent in public discourse.

1 Reply

@snood,

Quote:

Oh, you made a funny - good for you! Yes, this "conversation" is about Bernie. In fact it even bears a title with his name. But this part of this conversation about Bernie was about how Bernie is becoming less preeminent in public discourse.

This is a place where I come to study behavior and share different view points of reality with others, it is not a place where many Bernie supporters gather.

If you really would like to see a lot of conversation about Bernie you can look around and you will see a few but if you would like to see many you would have to become more prosocial and then you would see an explosion of them.

Have I ever told you that I find a true benefit and extreme value in prosocial psychopaths? I found it to be very strange at first because I was very naïve.

1 Reply

@reasoning logic,

If you actually think anyone reads past the second sentence in your inane psycho-blatherings, congratulations. You have achieved true delusion.

0 Replies

http://alexanderhiggins.com/stanford-berkley-study-1-77-billion-chance-hillary-won-primary-without-widespread-election-fraud/

Will follow up on peer reviewed response.

4 Replies

@Lash,

The voting machines that are deemed hackable are older voting machines. People in predominantly African American cities and towns tend to have older voting machines because these are not the wealthier towns, by and large. That's why Hillary does better in towns with voting machines that are deemed hackable. Somehow these guys fail to figure this out.

2 Replies

@Blickers,

Other headlines on that wonderful objective online rag she just referenced:

Private Emails Reveal Ex-Clinton Aide’s Secret Spy Network

GUN OWNERS ARE TERRORISTS’: HILLARY NODS IN AGREEMENT

1 Reply

@Blickers,

There were too many different issues too many times in too many places.

1 Reply

@Lash,

The "Hillary does better in places where the machines are hackable" seems to be the issue they put the most emphasis on. Plus the Bernie-or-Bust crowd considers closed primaries election fraud, so they throw that in the mix as well.

0 Replies

@snood,

Quote snood:

Quote:

Other headlines on that wonderful objective online rag she just referenced:

Private Emails Reveal Ex-Clinton Aide’s Secret Spy Network

GUN OWNERS ARE TERRORISTS’: HILLARY NODS IN AGREEMENT

Yes, here's another gem from Lash's source:

Bankruptcy Expert Donald Trump Will Hand Terrorist Hillary Clinton The Presidential Election and Here’s Why

Nothing like a little refreshing objectivity to clear the air.

0 Replies

FBI and DOJ Will Indict Hillary Clinton Before July 25. Get Ready Bernie Sanders Supporters.

1 Reply

@reasoning logic,

Nothing against Sanders, but the first three minutes of that vid more or less proves that anyone can buy a camera.

0 Replies

@Lash,

Lash wrote:

http://alexanderhiggins.com/stanford-berkley-study-1-77-billion-chance-hillary-won-primary-without-widespread-election-fraud/

Will follow up on peer reviewed response.

http://www.snopes.com/stanford-study-proves-election-fraud-through-exit-poll-discrepancies/

Not sure how Berkley got thrown into that mess, but a better title would be "Stanford Student Submits Finals Project as Press Release." Also, the 1-in-77 Billion appears to refer to whether the current delegate count is exactly congruent with what the exit polls indicate should be the results, not whether Clinton would still be ahead in delegates.

Just a bunch of hand-waving. This isn't even a published paper... The link in the original article goes to a PDF shared through google drive.

If you want to see what a real statistician thinks of the Bernie/Clinton contest, go read Nate Silver at 538.com.

0 Replies

@Lash,

A not peer reviewed paper that when you delve into it states that less than 600,000 votes were stolen from Sanders.

Considering Clinton has almost 4,000,000 more votes than Sanders had and that 600,000 is less than 3% of the total vote, I don't see much there other than some eggheads trying to build a mountain out of nothing.

By the way, a poll usually has a margin of error of 3-5%. If Sanders lost 600,000 votes that is within the 3% margin of error.

0 Replies

@Lash,

Lash wrote:

Will follow up on peer reviewed response.

No, you won't.

2 Replies

@DrewDad,

Was implying I surmised it might be sketchy, so I would reserve judgment until it was verified.

The primary was a joke - no matter whose side you were on.

0 Replies

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know