Bernie's In

Concur.

I don't believe she'll be indicted at all, let alone prior to the convention.

More like, "no fair! Their team is better than ours!"

It's the job of the campaign to get the candidate in front of the voters. That's the whole point of the campaign.

Whine, kvetch, 20/20 hindsight, tomato, tomahto........

Bernie lost. I'll be relieved when he concedes clearly and makes even a perfunctory statement to his followers about supporting the nominee.

A "blackout" is not what the linked research describes nor could I find that the researcher(s) used it. The term originates with the writer taking quotes from the research. The research itself looks fine and has interesting data.

You accused me of being "creative " when I stated the fact about Obama dodging votes in the Senate because he didn't want to be accountable to voters in an election cycle.

You were wrong. Your character is lacking.

Definitive ad hominem

I'll have to cop to that. She accused me of lying; I proved with a link that I was telling the truth, and she didn't acknowledge it. I think that's a character fail.

We say ter mah' 'er. The glottal stop is everything.

You people really need to learn to speak English.

If that link is anything like your normal links, it didn't prove what you say it did. And between you and revellette in a mouthiness competition, you are infinitely mouthier.

Number one, I did not accuse you of lying, I said you were creative. Number two the reason I said you were creative was because of the part underlined down below.



Your link did not say he didn't vote at all in the run up to his campaign much less because he didn't want voters to see who he was when it came down to votes. Your link said he missed 60% of votes, without giving an explanation of why he missed votes. So you were creative.

Number three, I didn't check out your link. I responded to another claim and missed altogether where you left the link about missing senators votes. I actually have you on ignore, but I usually lift it up to see what you have to say, I missed that one.

Number four, I can live with your opinion of me without whining about ad hominem and/or reporting you like some kind of infant tattletale.

Perspective: everybody's got one.

It was Factcheck.com, and I remember being a little jazzed about O's candidacy, but his proclivity to duck votes disappointed me. It's a fact.

Your friend Snood is an infantile little tattletale? This does apply to everyone who reports, right? You just dissed a lot of your cohorts.

You can talk.

That's self refuting.

And that's bollocks.

So tell me, did you vote for McCain instead? McCain missed 80.5% of the vote. Were you disappointed in him as well?

My dad was from Shropshire. You know the region? The men? Bollocks like a Saskatchewan prairie bison.

I didn't vote in that election. I'd been following O's trajectory with interest; cooled on McCain early; deemed O inexperienced and dodgy. Stalemate.