spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 04:54 am
I don't even have a tunnel.

Aren't they a bit dark and narrow.
0 Replies
 
devriesj
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 01:04 pm
Interesting question, xtra medium. I wonder why you ask. I never really thought of it, but I'd like for my family to get out of the little financila scrape we're in and finish my master's degree.
I'm curious to know what you mean by 'next deat' and, if it's not too person, are you terminally ill?

If not xtra medium, how would you say other people describe you?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 01:18 pm
dev-

It's a French expression for that juddering sensation men get when their dignity and composure "die" on them."La petite morte" I think it is but Francis will put you right on it.We do the "stiff upper lip" here in England.

Do you think that expresses any cultural differences?
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 01:21 pm
I was thinking about it, Spendius. Assuredly "la petite mort" is more romantic...


What's your opinion about that?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 01:41 pm
I had heard that somewhere.It must have been the French Ministry of Propaganda.


Is that your opinion or have you deeper reasons?
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 01:45 pm
Deeper reasons indeed...

Are you always bothered with propaganda?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 01:51 pm
No.It doesn't bother me.You know what the man said-"Propaganda all is phoney."

Could you possibly see your way to supplying one of the deeper reasons?
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 01:57 pm
I could but I will not, at least in a public forum...

Do you usually speak your heart out?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 02:03 pm
I just did.Stiff upper lip is a heart thing.Just like the death of dignity and composure is a "petite mort" precisely because you can bring them back to life after you have completed the operation.(Gee F Stendahl woulda like that).

Surely you could provide an itsy-bitsy reason?
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 02:42 pm
Itsy bitsy reason for what? I can't, if I don't know what I am reasoning about.


Has there been anything in the news lately that you've found particularly interesting?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 03:08 pm
No.


Have you?
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 03:16 pm
Yes - I was particularly disappointed to see that Michael Jackson was found not guilty on all charges, although from very soon after the trial began, I was expecting that verdict. Still, it was a disappointment that he got away with activities that will probably cause serious and permanent damage to the children he played his little secret games with.

Do you find you do your best socializing at a bar or pub?
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 03:21 pm
I would probably agree to that at this moment.It's easier at the pub.
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 04:20 pm
aidan wrote:
Most important thing in a relationship is trust-no question- I have to be able to trust a person to be who they say they are.



What's important to you in a relationship?


Yes, however, I feel that the vaunter of false impression is soon caught with his pants down.

Importance to me in a relationship, it is obedience from the woman, it avoids arguments which are pointless exercises.


My favourite song from the top of my head would be; Suspicious Minds.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 04:25 pm
You are such an enigma - Mathos. But again, no question although I like Suspicious Minds as well - great melody. You seem to be exhibiting a very Spendian countenance tonight, by the way.

What would indicate obedience from a woman?
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 04:30 pm
I am the hunter, therefore the provider, her obedience is in taking care of everything else.

Do you appreciate and understand a person of my style, I realise it may be difficult for a woman to be so servile, but once she understood my appreciations of her obedience, she would tarry well.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 04:33 pm
I do appreciate (in the sense that I know they exist) and understand (in the sense that I think I may understand where such ideas might originate)a person of your style - in fact, I've known some.
But it would not be the type of relationship I would enjoy or even be able to function in for very long. I am way too much of an independent thinker to vow obedience to a man- any man- even my husband.


Do you think that you will find such a woman to marry?
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 04:37 pm
I did.

However, marriage was an option we did not seek to endorse ourselves. Eventually we decided life would be easier for us by pleasing others. Not to mention anything of the taxation savings.

Then you must enjoy fighting nature.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 04:40 pm
Not really - but it would be fighting my own particular nature to enter into a relationship with such expectations.

Do you think you will remarry?
0 Replies
 
Mathos
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 04:43 pm
No, I would never remarry.

A totally pointless worthless exercise.

I do not consider there be any benefit in having a piece of paper to state you own somebody else.

Why do women always get on about marriage?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lovatts - Question by margaret schwerin
1001 Ways to Call Someone "Stupid." - Discussion by DrewDad
Famous People Name Game - Discussion by Mame
Cities and Towns of USA - Discussion by Miller
Post about the one before you - Discussion by Green Army Sniper
Where am I - Travel Game II. - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
WHAT'S NEXT? - Discussion by Rod3
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Questions Game
  3. » Page 74
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 07/20/2025 at 10:10:06