80
   

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2016 10:49 am
@revelette2,
revelette2 wrote:


No, you are being treated the way you are because of the way you phrase Hillary supporters and have nasty labels for everything.
Quote:
The way I "phrase" them? What nasty labels do I have for everything?


Democrats and Bernie supporters however they label themselves have got to come together to fight for Hillary to win the WH so that Trump or Cruz does not win.
Quote:
That's your opinion. It's not mine. Again, my treatment is due to my refusal to agree with the popular opinion.


I am not saying the movement Bernie has started has to quit, I think a lot of it is good, just the Hillary trashing needs to stop. I think Bernie has let up on it, going by some of his more recent rallies. He is making it more about the democratic party as a whole. Which in itself is not helpful either if we want to help down ballot candidates win seats in the house and senate.
Quote:
I disagree.




If you look at what you said about the worst of what I do, it is disagreeing with the popular opinion, and using words you don't like.

Lash
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2016 10:52 am
@snood,
Let's look at snood's "nasty" personal comments.
snood wrote:

Amazing, really. With all the delusions of grandeur and Hillary derangement, she's still able to shoehorn in a persecution complex. That's some prodigious crazy.

Snood has few that approach how many insults he can pack into a few words.

He's like the Johnny Cochran of the art form. Impressive.
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  4  
Sun 1 May, 2016 11:01 am
@Lash,
Quote:
What nasty labels do I have for everything?


It is more of your divide and conquer strategy of dividing up democrats and leftist instead of looking for common ground to defeat republicans in the fall. Started out with neoliberal every other word. Personally I don't care if a thought of as a liberal or progressive or socialist, I am a democrat and proud of it which houses all those under those labels. You are the one who stated calling us republican lights (or words to that effect). Of course that is going to offend us and we will fight back. So no, it is not just a matter of a disagreeing politely with popular opinion. You are trying to push out of a party some of us have belonged to since we first started voting simple because we are going to vote for Hillary and don't look at her as the next thing to Satan.

Lash
 
  -1  
Sun 1 May, 2016 11:39 am
@revelette2,
Thanks for helping me to illustrate my point.

I haven't committed anything as atrocious as snood's hyperbolic accusations would merit.

I just disagree with people who vote for HRC, and I am comfortable explaining why.



0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  0  
Sun 1 May, 2016 11:48 am
I wonder if Obama did this on purpose, or if it was just an "unfortunate" result.

Odd facts:

Bernie Sanders was the only candidate at the prom (WHPD)
Obama had a few good jokes - one in particular about Hillary - that compares her to Sisyphus - that is trending hard on Twitter.

Settling scores?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChXoaiuUgAAPz15.jpg
Her motto to lure young voters, Obama said, "Trudge uphill with Hill."
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2016 12:07 pm
@Lash,
Hear hear.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  7  
Sun 1 May, 2016 12:12 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
, it is now clear that there is a strong case for indicting and prosecuting Hillary for her systematic lapses in protecting classified information ( some of it so-called "compartmented special Intel" info.). The statute involved (and under which Gen. Petraeus was convicted) does not require criminal intent - negligence is sufficient.

Actually, the statute Petraeus was convicted under DOES require intent and knowingly acting to remove classified material and it's a MISDEMEANOR.


http://www.ncwd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/general/Petraeus.pdf
Patreaus pled guilty under Title 18 Section 1924

The statute is here -
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924

Hillary receiving emails that were not marked as classified doesn't meet the standard of the law. Her email server is not an intent to remove and keep classified documents at an unauthorized location.

You should really check your facts goergeob because you are very wrong on this one.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2016 12:46 pm
@snood,
snood wrote:

Lash wrote:

The same reason I decided to ignore you - and it was peaceful for a while.

But, you insist on mentioning me.

And, as usual, you very ably show who is the "nastiest." Thankfully, not a contest I seek to win.

I prefer Bernie to Hillary Clinton. Hardly as diseased as you like to pretend so you can get your hate on.

Poor sad man.


Take a look at snood's personal attacks.
You deluded harpy. In the nastiest ways possible, you lay waste to anyone who disagrees with you then you are so lost that you actually say you are just discussing things.The scary thing is that you don't even notice how many enemies you have made here, or worse, you don't care.


Anyone who thinks I speak in a more personally insulting way is biased.
I have thrown out terms like "dumbass" in response to personal attacks, but very, very rarely been on the giving end of anything rivaling this dreck, which snood dishes out routinely.

Just so you know.
blatham
 
  3  
Sun 1 May, 2016 07:20 pm
Perhaps somewhat off topic but, it seems to me that God And Satan are a match made in heaven.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2016 08:06 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
ditto
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2016 08:15 pm
@snood,
****, you're going to make me cry..

I'm am an oddly solitary person, changing from a mildly boisterous woman to a semi hermit, for financial and physical reasons. Not to whine, as I'm still boisterous, but now with engaging here.

I'm wrong plenty of the time. And I can be crabby to the max.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Sun 1 May, 2016 08:17 pm
@blatham,
God and satan are made-made personas, created when the bible was written.
ossobuco
 
  2  
Sun 1 May, 2016 08:32 pm
@ossobuco,
Also, at Max. (I somewhat get him)
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  -2  
Sun 1 May, 2016 11:42 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
I think others over-react on purpose because it's fun for them. It's part of the devolution of dialogue between people who disagree.

The actual question is completely ignored, and partisans focus on minutiae around the periphery of the question at hand purposefully for sport. Then, they feign great righteous indignation and try to pack as many low personal insults as possible in a line or two, taking care to blame the whole thing on the one they insulted.

Very good description of what's happening here: Self-righteous gang mobsters abound on A2K, and they constantly blame their victim. It's your fault if they jump on you and treat you like shite.
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2016 05:53 am
@cicerone imposter,
I like you, really I do, I really envy your ability manage your live in such a way as to be able to travel and still have money to pay your bills and not worry. I envy the trips you have made, I have never made it farther than a couple of states since my grown years and only vaguely remember living a Colorado Springs when I was 4 and 5, the trip in bus back, I lost my doll and I collected rocks and talked to them in Colorado by the mountains.

However, you have such a way of stating obvious things as though no one else has thought of them. Of course I know a large majority do not believe in Satan or God. It was just a word to use to connote evil.
revelette2
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2016 06:48 am
@revelette2,
Sorry for using the wrong words or missing words, I was still half asleep, just filling time while waiting with grandkids to get off to their buses and didn't take time to go over a half dozen or so times it takes me to fill in the words I missed.. Anyway, I meant "manage your living in such a way..."
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  1  
Mon 2 May, 2016 11:56 am
Latest polls on Hillary vs Trump:

Investor's Business Daily/TIPP Poll. April 22-28, 2016.
Hillary...47............Trump...40

Suffolk University/USA Today. April 20-24,
Hillary...50............Trump...39

George Washington University Battleground Poll April 17-20, 2016.
Hillary... 46............Trump...43

NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll April 10-14,
Hillary... 50............Trump...39
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Mon 2 May, 2016 12:03 pm
@Blickers,
Thanks for sharing those stats. A sigh of relief. PHEW!
Lash
 
  -2  
Mon 2 May, 2016 02:36 pm
@cicerone imposter,
CI, I'm sorry to say that Blickers intentionally misled you and everyone else who read those stats.

Hillary shows a few points ahead of Trump in some polls.

Bernie is far and away higher than Trump.

In an election, you want to be 13 points up rather than 6 if you can.

You never know how many will stay home because they aren't enthusiastic about Hillary. It's so true that Obama got a big laugh at the White House Correspondents Dinner about how boring Hillary's candidacy is.

Look at the difference between Bernie and Hillary over Trump.

Why would anyone choose the candidate more likely to be beaten by Trump?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_sanders-5565.html
BillRM
 
  2  
Mon 2 May, 2016 02:52 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
Bernie is far and away higher than Trump.


It does not matter one little bit that Bernie is showing better then Hillary on a few polls again Trump as there is no way he can or will win the democratic party nomination.

That battle is over with.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

The Pro Hillary Thread - Discussion by snood
get this woman out of my view/politics - Discussion by ossobuco
Hillary Clinton hospitalized - Discussion by jcboy
Has Hillary's Time Come? - Discussion by Phoenix32890
I WANT HILLARY TO RUN IN 2012 - Discussion by farmerman
Hillary's The Secretary Of State..It's Official - Discussion by Bi-Polar Bear
Hillary the "JOKESTER"?? - Discussion by woiyo
Hillary Rebuked by Iraqi Leader - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/10/2024 at 12:30:32