80
   

When will Hillary Clinton give up her candidacy ?

 
 
RABEL222
 
  3  
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 09:24 pm
@Lash,
I still think you are a republican plant trying to get
Bernie on the dem ticket because you know he cant win. Accusing her of something that that article never said about her. The article said he was one of several shows that were going to be removed months ago.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 09:25 pm
@parados,
Quote:
It looks like MSNBC is revamping it's lineup.


Nice try. They are practically crying about Killarys rising unfavorable numbers, and her losing the election to three different Republicans in the swing states.

They are " hillabees" droning lies for Killary. No that is why Ed was fired. The attention goes to Killary and the rest of energy goes to identity politics.

That is the truth, but you keep on lying, it is what you do best.

Wouldn't a revamping include dumping Sharpton?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  -1  
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 09:32 pm
@parados,
MSNBC and Comcast never had a vested interest in a candidate losing like they do now - and a show that featured the guy who spells an end to their heyday.

They do now.
Lash
 
  -1  
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 09:33 pm
@RABEL222,
Yes. I'm a republican plant! (Who's paying me? I'm ready to collect.)
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 09:46 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

MSNBC and Comcast never had a vested interest in a candidate losing like they do now - and a show that featured the guy who spells an end to their heyday.

They do now.
Keep in mind that the WH killed the Comcast/Time Warner Cable deal, costing Comcast $200 million and the chance to have the market share needed to really turn the screws to the other content providers.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  2  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 10:17 am
This is what corruption in politics and the corporate media looks like.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/07/new-york-times-alters-clinton-email-story-211176.html
Hillary gets media to change headline and wording in story.
Wonder how much money that cost? No worries, though. She has millions from China, Saudi Arabia, Israel... She can effectively buy the election since we see she can force media to withdraw stories.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 10:50 am
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

This is what corruption in politics and the corporate media looks like.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/07/new-york-times-alters-clinton-email-story-211176.html
Hillary gets media to change headline and wording in story.
Wonder how much money that cost? No worries, though. She has millions from China, Saudi Arabia, Israel... She can effectively buy the election since we see she can force media to withdraw stories.


Keep doing as much as you can to damage Hillary, Lash. She is the leading contender to head the Dem ticket...but do as much as you can to damage her.

Help the people who hate the safety net programs get elected instead of her. Damage those programs if necessary...to make your point that Hillary does not belong in the White House.

That ought to help what you (and some of these others here) are trying to achieve. (All said sarcastically.)

You people have fallen off the edge.

I expected it...these kinds of things start slowly...but then become avalanches.

It started out that you considered Sanders the better choice...now you've worked yourself up to "almost anyone will be a better choice." Soon it will be "even Donald Trump is a better choice."

If you put your mind to it (and it seems you intend to) you can convince people who would otherwise vote for her if she is the candidate...to vote for someone else instead.

You can convince people "anyone but her."

That will be a singular achievement!

Something you will be able to say, "Having helped do that is something of which I am mightily proud!


coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:14 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
You can convince people "anyone but her."


That is a good thing.http://www.alien-earth.com/images/smileys/cheer.gif

Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:28 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
You can convince people "anyone but her."


That is a good thing.http://www.alien-earth.com/images/smileys/cheer.gif




I'm sure you like it, cj.

I'm sure most of the conservatives in America do.

That's kinda what I am saying there.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:33 pm
@Lash,
Lash wrote:

Yes. I'm a republican plant! (Who's paying me? I'm ready to collect.)


Try applying here. (An affiliate of Koch industries.)

http://www.fhr.com/community/RequestForm.aspx
Lash
 
  0  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:34 pm
@izzythepush,
OMG. Fabulous idea. I'll get the money for my dirty duplicitous work and send it to The Bern. Smile
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:47 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
I'm sure you like it, cj.


Why would you want a lying manipulator with 0 moral character running this country? She had a personal relationship with Alinsky. She has taken money from countries that brutalize women. And she hides from the press.

We need someone who tells the truth. She is not that person.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:47 pm
@Lash,
Is that what passes for irony in your neck of the woods?

I've never known you say anything political that couldn't be described as far right. I understand Frank's cynicism in that someone whose views are as far right as yours is highly unlikely to show genuine interest in a left of centre candidate.
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:50 pm
@izzythepush,
Really? My views on gay marriage and equal rights...? What were they again? When OBAMA and CLINTON voted for DOMA?

You don't know what you're talking about.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:52 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
You don't know what you're talking about.


That is old news.
http://www.alien-earth.com/images/smileys/rofl.gif
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 03:15 pm
@Lash,
Your views on healthcare are very right wing. You can support gay marriage and be right wing. Our Conservative government brought it in before you had yours.
parados
 
  3  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 03:35 pm
@Lash,
No. Hillary didn't do anything to change the story. The original claims that the NY Times ran with turned out to be wrong. Actual facts caused them to change the story to keep it true.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 03:41 pm
@parados,
Right on, Parados.

One other thing...almost every politician who sees a story that even remotely casts a negative tone...will at least comment to an editor about it. Goes with the business.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 04:24 pm
@izzythepush,
And what are my views on healthcare?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 05:05 pm
@Lash,
Anti UHC.
 

Related Topics

The Pro Hillary Thread - Discussion by snood
get this woman out of my view/politics - Discussion by ossobuco
Hillary Clinton hospitalized - Discussion by jcboy
Has Hillary's Time Come? - Discussion by Phoenix32890
I WANT HILLARY TO RUN IN 2012 - Discussion by farmerman
Hillary's The Secretary Of State..It's Official - Discussion by Bi-Polar Bear
Hillary the "JOKESTER"?? - Discussion by woiyo
Hillary Rebuked by Iraqi Leader - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.17 seconds on 12/24/2024 at 08:53:45