I still think you are a republican plant trying to get
Bernie on the dem ticket because you know he cant win. Accusing her of something that that article never said about her. The article said he was one of several shows that were going to be removed months ago.
Nice try. They are practically crying about Killarys rising unfavorable numbers, and her losing the election to three different Republicans in the swing states.
They are " hillabees" droning lies for Killary. No that is why Ed was fired. The attention goes to Killary and the rest of energy goes to identity politics.
That is the truth, but you keep on lying, it is what you do best.
Wouldn't a revamping include dumping Sharpton?
0 Replies
Lash
-1
Thu 23 Jul, 2015 09:32 pm
@parados,
MSNBC and Comcast never had a vested interest in a candidate losing like they do now - and a show that featured the guy who spells an end to their heyday.
MSNBC and Comcast never had a vested interest in a candidate losing like they do now - and a show that featured the guy who spells an end to their heyday.
They do now.
Keep in mind that the WH killed the Comcast/Time Warner Cable deal, costing Comcast $200 million and the chance to have the market share needed to really turn the screws to the other content providers.
0 Replies
Lash
2
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 10:17 am
This is what corruption in politics and the corporate media looks like. http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/07/new-york-times-alters-clinton-email-story-211176.html
Hillary gets media to change headline and wording in story.
Wonder how much money that cost? No worries, though. She has millions from China, Saudi Arabia, Israel... She can effectively buy the election since we see she can force media to withdraw stories.
This is what corruption in politics and the corporate media looks like. http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/07/new-york-times-alters-clinton-email-story-211176.html
Hillary gets media to change headline and wording in story.
Wonder how much money that cost? No worries, though. She has millions from China, Saudi Arabia, Israel... She can effectively buy the election since we see she can force media to withdraw stories.
Keep doing as much as you can to damage Hillary, Lash. She is the leading contender to head the Dem ticket...but do as much as you can to damage her.
Help the people who hate the safety net programs get elected instead of her. Damage those programs if necessary...to make your point that Hillary does not belong in the White House.
That ought to help what you (and some of these others here) are trying to achieve. (All said sarcastically.)
You people have fallen off the edge.
I expected it...these kinds of things start slowly...but then become avalanches.
It started out that you considered Sanders the better choice...now you've worked yourself up to "almost anyone will be a better choice." Soon it will be "even Donald Trump is a better choice."
If you put your mind to it (and it seems you intend to) you can convince people who would otherwise vote for her if she is the candidate...to vote for someone else instead.
You can convince people "anyone but her."
That will be a singular achievement!
Something you will be able to say, "Having helped do that is something of which I am mightily proud!
Why would you want a lying manipulator with 0 moral character running this country? She had a personal relationship with Alinsky. She has taken money from countries that brutalize women. And she hides from the press.
We need someone who tells the truth. She is not that person.
0 Replies
izzythepush
1
Fri 24 Jul, 2015 01:47 pm
@Lash,
Is that what passes for irony in your neck of the woods?
I've never known you say anything political that couldn't be described as far right. I understand Frank's cynicism in that someone whose views are as far right as yours is highly unlikely to show genuine interest in a left of centre candidate.
Your views on healthcare are very right wing. You can support gay marriage and be right wing. Our Conservative government brought it in before you had yours.
No. Hillary didn't do anything to change the story. The original claims that the NY Times ran with turned out to be wrong. Actual facts caused them to change the story to keep it true.
One other thing...almost every politician who sees a story that even remotely casts a negative tone...will at least comment to an editor about it. Goes with the business.
