@snood,
Quote:All you have to do to be that consistently off is to start every discussion with the premise "Obama is wrong, and I will find a way to prove it."
Very early on in Obama's first term, Mitch McConnell was quite explicit as regards this political strategy. He explained that in order to differentiate the GOP from Dems, they would oppose Obama admin initiatives. He said that if they did not do this, then it would add validation to any notions that Dems had good or workable policy ideas. He and his party wanted to prevent any growing consensus on precisely on such notions. It makes a sort of sense IF your goal is power rather than effective goverenance that concerns itself with citizens' needs and wishes.
And that's not new (even if it is now taken to such extremes). Some of you will know of Bill Kristol's 1993 strategy memo to the GOP where he argued that the Clinton healthcare initiative (which they'd labeled "Hillarycare" as a means of personalizing the plan, that is, of suggesting it was autocratic and
anti-democratic even if majorities of citizens wanted such a thing and even though they'd voted in Bill Clinton. They coordinated a narrative that Hillary was unelected and therefore had no proper business acting politically in this fashion). In that '93 memo, Kristol advised that "Hillarycare" had to be crushed totally. Why? Here's what he said in the memo...
Quote:"Unqualified political defeat of the Clinton health care proposal,would be a monumental setback for the president, and an incontestable piece of evidence that Democratic welfare-state liberalism remains firmly in retreat."
It's important to get that point. Kristol was aware that since Reagan, there had been a shift in American consensus about what government ought and ought not to be doing. Social programs were firmly in the "not" category, and particularly, new social programs. He saw it as necessary that anti-government ideology continue to be fostered. And he saw it as advantageous, politically for the GOP, if Clinton was to be seen as ineffective. Maximal obstructionism by the GOP has its genesis right here. In that memo, he also said...
Quote:[Hillarycare's] success would signal a rebirth of centralized welfare-state policy at the very moment we have begun rolling back that idea in other areas...the Clinton proposal is also a serious political threat to the Republican Party. Republicans must therefore clearly understand the political strategy implicit in the Clinton plan--and then adopt an aggressive and uncompromising counterstrategy designed to delegitimize the proposal and defeat its partisan purpose...."It will relegitimize middle-class dependence for 'security' on government spending and regulation. It will revive the reputation of the party that spends and regulates, the Democrats, as the generous protector of middle-class interests. And it will at the same time strike a punishing blow against Republican claims to defend the middle class by restraining government."
http://bit.ly/xUSGL0
If you read the whole memo (and you definitely should) you'll see that Kristol's strategies were duplicated quite exactly with Obamacare (and, let's note, with everything else Obama's administration has sought to achieve).
The reason I bring this up in response to your post, snood, was to make the case that though Obama has faced broad and sustained obstructionism along with a thousand and one character-assassination narratives (remember the terrorist fist bump) and even though racism has surely and inarguably been a factor in what we've seen on the right, my thinking is that this race factor isn't the key to GOP obstructionism. It is merely one more device or opportunity to facilitate obstructionism.
Another key political facet here (you can see it implicitly above) is the purposeful strategy to curb government effectiveness exactly and precisely because wherever government might establish a policy or institution which actually improves citizens' lives, then this in itself invalidates the modern conservative premise at the core of its ideology that government is the problem.
If there is any idea folks need to understand in all this, it is the one I've just bolded.