McGentrix wrote:nimh wrote:He's an idealist, yeah - and he already expresses that by spending all his time and effort on politics and idealistically motivated documentaries. I mean, whether you agree with them or not, thats what he does. And thats already more than most do. He has no "task" to live in poverty, like Rick said, just cause he's an idealist.
Isn't that one of the liberal commandments though? That the wealthy should be stripped of their wealth to be given to the needy? Has that changed all the sudden because one of your own is fluanting his wealth?
I assume he pays his taxes. I assume that, as a good lefty, he wouldn't object to any hefty rise in his taxes to pay for more and better health care, social security, etc. But as LW pointed out, St. Francis of Assisi he is not and need not be. That shouldnt be so hard a distinction to grasp, should it?