Jargon Pot Luck. Please bring something that sounds erudite.

@Lustig Andrei,

...whatever...

1 Reply

@Lustig Andrei,

...or whatevah...

0 Replies

@Lustig Andrei,

Loss of thread could be the onset of Alzheimers or a display of raw ribaldry

1 Reply

@neologist,

Raw ribaldry if considering an appearance will be finding obsecrating solemnly put upon. And that's not an opportunity that will be happiness generated.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

Is raw ribaldry preferable to cooked ribaldry, particularly for the relatively uninitiated who may eschew the gaminess inherent in the nascent state?

1 Reply

@firefly,

I would put an interrobang here as the question is a quodlibet..

1 Reply

@timur,

And using that dreadful humidifying interrobang would be consistent with your unfortunate tendency to dodge centrific issues and difficult questions by washing over them with a plethora of perspiratory pronouncements.

1 Reply

@firefly,

Usually, I'm known for my parciloquy.

1 Reply

@timur,

I find your taciturn manner to be pauciloquent as well

1 Reply

@neologist,

Irrefragable statement..

1 Reply

@timur,

This is all very blousy. Too much reverential epistickyness going on. I am adverse to gummup psychology: too many fabricators want to foil tin and refuse to gear down to accept long time plates made of words.

1 Reply

@ossobuco,

I must marinate on that, before I have any hope of expectorating. But upon genuflecting a tad I've become moor mellifluous in such matters. Uhhhh, what was the question???

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

glitterbag wrote:

. . .. Uhhhh, what was the question???

Is idiosyncrasy really a close order drill for the mentally challenged?

1 Reply

@neologist,

I'm not sure, a great deal depends on the idiographics of the subjects, much practice is required to be close order drilling as well a bipedability and quickness of counting.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

And, lets not forget, that a lot depends on whether the strides are synchronized for diminished variability or pixelated for strident atonal resonance.

You are wise to reserve any possibly effete judgments until heuristic inquiries return irrefutable results. Idiosyncrasy cannot be ascertained merely on the basis of lack of hyperconformity.

1 Reply

@firefly,

I agree, even if one were endowed with a plethora of cornucopias of synchronized hyperconformity it's nascent effete judginess to be avidly avoiding, it's just gooder to acertain the judgy prior to confirmation.

2 Replies

@glitterbag,

With your unfailing instinct for verisimilitude, you have once again identified the most salient existential question for mankind--"Do you want fries with that?"

0 Replies

I had thought my normally phlegmatic personality would stay me well through my recent struggle with a plethora of virus generated mucopolysaccharides. Then I remembered the words are not related.

0 Replies

From Matthew Slepitza's thread:

Herald wrote:

IMV all the retards dealing with phenomenology of the personality should be prophylactically exterminated, just in case.

neologist wrote:

Do you mind if I include this statement in my classics folder? It seems to fit the brown cloud category.

0 Replies

@glitterbag,

Worth forwarding to the Magick thread

glitterbag wrote:

I agree, even if one were endowed with a plethora of cornucopias of synchronized hyperconformity it's nascent effete judginess to be avidly avoiding, it's just gooder to acertain the judgy prior to confirmation.

1 Reply

Jargon Pot Luck. Please bring something that sounds erudite.

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know