50
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 10:20 am
@Region Philbis,
That will be Brennan, Clapper, Me Cabe and Comey for real and probably soon. If they sing Obama and Clinton will join them. Durham will not present hearsay, he will have solid proof. So another meme fail.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 12:48 pm
@coldjoint,
Do please try to escape from your wiling confinemet on Conspiracy Theory Island.
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 12:54 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
Do please try to escape from your wiling confinemet on Conspiracy Theory Island.

You better tell Durham that. Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 01:07 pm
Rudy Giuliani Is Now the Subject of Three Different Investigations: Report
By Matt Stieb
Rudy Giuliani began the week hot, with an advance piece of guerrilla marketing for a potential podcast that would “analyze the impeachment in every aspect.” But by the week’s end, the news cycle wasn’t looking as good: Late on Thursday, Bloomberg reported that Giuliani is under federal investigation for possible campaign-finance violations, as well as a failure to register as a foreign agent.

Aside from throwing off his prospective show, the timing isn’t great: The president’s lawyer is the subject of a criminal investigation and a counterintelligence investigation for his dealings in Ukraine. The U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan and the Justice Department in D.C. are looking into his business dealings in the country, while the FBI is evaluating if his actions have been willingly or unwillingly influenced by a foreign government.

The new investigation will determine if Giuliani violated laws against bribing foreign officials. Former federal prosecutor Kenneth McCallion told Bloomberg that it’s possible Giuliani could face an extortion charge for his role in pressuring Ukraine into investigating Hunter Biden and a conspiracy theory about Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election. McCallion added that a charge like that could implicate the president in a criminal activity, though he could not be charged while in office.

Unlike the prior investigations, in which no indictments have been handed down, four of Giuliani’s associates have already been charged with campaign-finance violations. Giuliani’s clients, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, were indicted in early October for hiding the source of a $325,000 donation to the super-PAC America First. Then came the arrest of California businessman Andrey Kukushkin, who worked with Parnas and Fruman to move $10,000 of foreign money into Nevada politics in order to help a Russian businessman obtain commercial marijuana licenses. And on October 16, David Correia was arrested for his alleged involvement in the Nevada scheme. That prosecutors have pursued four of his associates for campaign-finance violations should concern Giuliani: “I would not be surprised if he gets indicted,” former SDNY prosecutor Mimi Rocah told Bloomberg.

Further bad news: Though the president has retained Giuliani as his personal lawyer throughout the Ukraine scandal, GOP lawmakers are reportedly pressing Trump to ditch him in order to create some distance between himself and Giuliani’s efforts to push the quid pro quo in Ukraine. “Rudy will be cut loose because he was rogue,” one Republican told Axios.

Comment:
Will Rudy go to jail for Trump or tweet like a bird to "make a deal"? lol
BillW
 
  3  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 01:14 pm
@TheCobbler,
Yes!
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 01:23 pm
@coldjoint,
Doesn't do any good to post them to blind, deaf, braindead posters who face the wall and scream no, no, no, no.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 01:25 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Doesn't do any good to post them to blind, deaf, braindead posters

So you are having trouble figuring out what is posted? Anything I can do?
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 01:31 pm
Elise Stefanik's Democratic Opponent Raises $250,000 In Donations In 24hrs: UPDATED
https://crooksandliars.com/2019/11/elise-stefaniks-democratic-opponent-hits
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  4  
Reply Sat 16 Nov, 2019 09:28 pm
@Baldimo,
An act in four parts.

baldimo wrote:
No, policy criticism was considered racism. Anytime I had a complaint about what Obama was doing, I was called a racist. That's the facts . Even now, critizing a politician that is a minority is considered racist, it's all the left has to defend their anti-American policies.




hingehead wrote:
Could you show me one of those posts? Because in all seriousness it's not something I'd accuse you of based on policy criticism. Did everyone do it? 10%? One person?

Did Obama ever do it?



hingehead wrote:

Could you show me one of those posts?


baldimo wrote:
I could, but I'm not going to dig through 10 years of posts. It happened every time someone spoke out against Obama's policies. It has now shifted, if you disagree with the left, you are now a Nazi or a Russian bot.



hingehead wrote:
Thanks for the tip - it makes it a lot easier to find them when "It happened every time someone spoke out against Obama's policies."

So I picked a random obamacare thread:

Major Problems with ObamaCare!
https://able2know.org/topic/207660-1

Well blow me down with a feather - not one mention of 'racist' in four pages of posts.

How could that be?


14 days of silence from Baldimo on this thread - and then:

baldimo wrote:
You mean firing deep state agents like Clapper, Comey and Strzok? Fusion GPS working with the intelligence agencies, through Bruce Orr and his wife to frame Trump? They were corrupted by Obama.


hingehead wrote:
Gee, still no response like you claimed happened all the time.


You're welcome.
snood
 
  4  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 05:35 am
@hingehead,
I’ve had similar face-to-face conversations with people, wherein they accuse me of “always” accusing them of being racist about Obama. While, the truth was, we’d never had a conversation that included both racism and Obama. I could only conclude then (as now regarding the interaction between you and Baldimo) that it is all in their heads. It’s like a man going out in public shouting “I don’t beat my wife!”, when no one had asked if he did. Methinks they protest too much.
revelette3
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 08:47 am
In Louisiana, a Narrow Win for John Bel Edwards and a Hard Loss for Trump
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 09:27 am
@snood,
snood wrote:
I've had similar face-to-face conversations with people, wherein they accuse me of "always" accusing them of being racist about Obama. While, the truth was, we'd never had a conversation that included both racism and Obama.

Democrats did a good job of keeping their kookiness bottled up during Obama's first term. But as soon as he was reelected, suddenly there was all sorts of kooky ranting from the left about how Obama's failures were because Republicans are racists.

Most likely, these people that you talked to, their memories conflated non-Obama-related accusations of racism coming from you with all of the Obama-related accusations of racism that they received from other quarters.

From what I recall, every time you've falsely accused me of racism, it had nothing to do with Obama. But I'm much better at recalling facts than most people. It would be unfair to expect others to have the same high quality recall that I possess.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 09:28 am
@snood,
snood wrote:

Methinks they protest too much.


If you think that's bad, don't ever suggest that gun ownership is a way of compensating for inadequate genitalia.
snood
 
  3  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 09:39 am
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:

snood wrote:

Methinks they protest too much.


If you think that's bad, don't ever suggest that gun ownership is a way of compensating for inadequate genitalia.


Hush your mouth!😁
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 09:45 am
@snood,
It is perfectly reasonable for people to defend themselves from name-calling.

The fact that leftists only engage in name-calling because they are not capable of producing intelligent arguments is no excuse.
snood
 
  3  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 09:50 am
@oralloy,
For what reason are you addressing this to me?
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 09:55 am
@snood,
Partly because of your amused response when the subject of leftist name-calling was raised. Partly because it was the most recent post in that sub-thread about leftist name-calling.
snood
 
  3  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 10:03 am
@oralloy,
Izzy didn’t call any names. He simply suggested a possible connection between firearms obsession and insecurity about one’s genitals.

oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 10:05 am
@snood,
That is incorrect. That is name-calling.
snood
 
  2  
Reply Sun 17 Nov, 2019 10:05 am
@oralloy,
What name?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 04/24/2024 at 12:41:44