50
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 08:05 am
@TheCobbler,
TheCobbler wrote:
Giving weapons of mass destruction to crazies

No one is talking about giving nuclear weapons to anyone.


TheCobbler wrote:
idiot,

Just because you can't make an intelligent argument is no reason to engage in name-calling.


TheCobbler wrote:
Each mass shooting makes the argument against the second amendment stronger.

Leftists hate our civil liberties. So what else is new?


TheCobbler wrote:
You and your greedy party are going to be the death of the second amendment.

I support the Second Amendment. And Mr. Trump prevents the Democratic Party from harming our civil liberties.
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 08:22 am
The Trump administration just banned bump stocks for guns
More than a year after the Las Vegas mass shooting, bump stocks are officially set to become illegal.

By German [email protected]@vox.com Dec 18, 2018,

President Donald Trump’s administration has banned bump stocks, which effectively let semiautomatic weapons mimic machine guns.

The administration’s final regulation, likely to officially publish on Friday, will bring bump stocks into the broader federal ban on machine guns starting in late March 2019, forcing people who own bump stocks today to turn in or destroy the devices within 90 days. The administration originally introduced the rule in March 2018, but it needed to go through a formal regulatory approval process to take effect.

The bump stock ban originally came up in response to the Las Vegas shooting last year, in which a shooter used the devices to kill 58 people and injure hundreds more. The gunman still may have carried out the shooting without bump stocks, but the devices made the shooting much deadlier by turning his semiautomatic weapons into guns that closely simulated automatics.

Automatic weapons are what many Americans think of as machine guns. They can continuously fire off a stream of bullets if the user simply holds down the trigger, making them very deadly. Semiautomatic weapons, by contrast, fire a single bullet per trigger pull. The difference between an automatic and a semiautomatic effectively translates to firing hundreds of rounds a minute versus dozens or so in the same time frame.

Under federal law, fully automatic weapons are technically legal only if made before 1986, when Congress passed the Firearm Owners’ Protection Act. So it’s illegal to manufacture new automatic weapons for civilian use.

Bump stocks offer a way around the law, as the Associated Press explained shortly after the Las Vegas shooting:

The device basically replaces the gun’s shoulder rest, with a “support step” that covers the trigger opening. By holding the pistol grip with one hand and pushing forward on the barrel with the other, the shooter’s finger comes in contact with the trigger. The recoil causes the gun to buck back and forth, “bumping” the trigger.

Technically, that means the finger is pulling the trigger for each round fired, keeping the weapon a legal semi-automatic.

There are other modifications that achieve a similar effect, including a crank that replaces the trigger and turns a gun into what a gun aficionado channel on YouTube called “a mini Gatling Gun.”

Shortly after the Parkland, Florida, high school shooting in February, Trump called on the Justice Department to ban bump stocks and similar devices (although the Parkland shooting did not involve a bump stock). The Justice Department’s decision to do so came despite a reluctance that the Justice Department or Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) have the legal authority ban bump stocks and similar devices.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/12/18/18146455/trump-bump-stock-ban-gun-violence
0 Replies
 
visceral
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 11:37 am
@ekename,
We had a business man, and see what happened.....
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 11:58 am
@oralloy,
Yeah, he got the su[port of 90% of the country and the NRA stil fucked it up. One of the reasons the NRA lost big in 2018. One of the reasons NY is investigating them and they're likely to ose their tax exempt status. The mills of the gods grind slow.....
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 12:01 pm
@ekename,
Nice theory, however Trump is losing in head to head matchups to both moderates and progresives. It's gonna ve a vote blue no matter who year.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 06:51 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Yeah, he got the support of 90% of the country and the NRA still fucked it up.

We can do that to progressives as many times as we need to.

How much did Obama achieve in his second term once he completely wasted his first hundred days?

If progressives want their legislative agenda to be an endless wasteland of failure, we can help them achieve that goal.


MontereyJack wrote:
One of the reasons the NRA lost big in 2018.

That is incorrect. All the NRA strongholds remain strong.


MontereyJack wrote:
One of the reasons NY is investigating them and they're likely to ose their tax exempt status. The mills of the gods grind slow.....

The First Amendment will protect the NRA from progressive aggression.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 08:28 am
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Where was it proven that Bet Kavanaugh wasn't guilty of anything he was accused of.

Considering 2 of the 3 accusers came forward and admitted to lying, the 3rd one has zero evidence of anything she claims, she has no one who backs her story, it's a clear cut case of a nothing burger. The DNC loves the false allegations, but they fail to realize that they hurt real victims.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/02/brett-kavanaugh-accuser-referred-fbi-doj-investigation/1863210002/
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 10:21 am
@Baldimo,
This makes it look like all the accusers recanted. They did not. Only this woman and her lawyer. More lies and half truths by a conservative liar.
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 12:32 pm
@RABEL222,
If you pay attention, you will see the title of the article is called "Another Kavanaugh accuser admits to fabricating rape story". That means more than one have changed their story, there are two different people mentioned in the article. One of them had the creepy porn lawyer to represent them, he's now under indictment for trying to scam Nike and for taking money that wasn't his.


0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 12:54 pm
@Baldimo,
there were ateast four accusers. the one in the article denied it was her that filed nd kavanaugh's best bud wrute a tell all memoir about their class and said they regularly got blind staggeringly drunk ymously. ,on the weekends
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 01:05 pm
@MontereyJack,
It's not like he's black or Mexican or anything, he's a rich Republican boy, he should be allowed to rape as many women as he wants.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 01:34 pm
@MontereyJack,
Quote:
there were ateast four accusers.

The only one not to pull her story was the lying Dr. No one backed her story and she didn't even have any correct details and couldn't remember the house. It was a fraud that people like you perpetuate.

Quote:
the one in the article denied it was her that filed

Quote:
Mr. Grassley said Ms. Munro-Leighton is a left-wing activist who hijacked another “Jane Doe” anonymous report about a backseat rape and claimed it as her own story, calling it a “vicious assault.”

“In short, during the committee’s time-sensitive investigation of allegations against Judge Kavanaugh, Ms. Munro-Leighton submitted a fabricated allegation, which diverted committee resources,” Mr. Grassley wrote. “When questioned by Committee investigators she admitted it was false, a ‘ploy,’ and a ‘tactic.’ She was opposed to Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation.”

Mr. Grassley has previously asked the FBI to probe Julie Swetnick and her lawyer, anti-Trump crusader Michael Avenatti, for lying to Congress and obstructing. Ms. Swetnick had originally claimed to have been the victim of gang rapes involving Justice Kavanaugh during high school parties, saying she saw him and a friend spike punch to leave girls unable to resist. She later changed her story to say she saw Justice Kavanaugh and his friend near a punch bowl, and could not identify them as having actually been part of any rape.

None of the witnesses she told NBC could corroborate her story were able to do so.

Indeed, NBC found one woman who despite a sworn statement backing up Ms. Swetnick, told the network Mr. Avenatti was twisting her words.

So this one had no relation with Kavanaugh. Unless you have another story with more accusers?

Quote:
nd kavanaugh's best bud wrute a tell all memoir about their class and said they regularly got blind staggeringly drunk ymously. ,on the weekends

Did you never spend your weekends in college getting drunk? I don't know how old you were in the 1980's, but that was pretty common since there were still some states that had a drinking age of 18 and not 21. Ever spent any time in the military? Guess what what they do on the weekends, they drink.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 02:53 pm
@Baldimo,
Still cherry picking unproven quotes out your ass. This was one person admitting she lied. The other 3 or 4 never recanted and the fact one did doesn't negate the fact the others dident. The conservative senators who believe in the right of rich whites to rape anyone they want too has been the rule for centuries. But that is changing and they will all get their reward on earth rather than heaven.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 03:08 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Still cherry picking unproven quotes out your ass. This was one person admitting she lied. The other 3 or 4 never recanted and the fact one did doesn't negate the fact the others dident.

You still can't count, there were 2 mentions in that article.
They all lied and have no proof that what they claim happened. I'm still waiting for the Dr. to file her rape report, there is no limitations on such crimes in the state it took place in.

Quote:
The conservative senators who believe in the right of rich whites to rape anyone they want too has been the rule for centuries.

Hyperbolic much? This actually isn't the case but keep up with your BS.

Quote:
But that is changing and they will all get their reward on earth rather than heaven.

Do you really want to take an accounting of who has been taken down in the #metoo movement? Not to mention the total backfire that has taken place since it started? You need to stop reading those left-wing rags who lie to you.
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Tue 3 Sep, 2019 04:36 pm
@Baldimo,
Are you a senator? Getting nervous about accusation are we?
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Sep, 2019 03:06 pm
@RABEL222,
Quote:
Are you a senator?

Nope, I'm a regular dude.

Quote:
Getting nervous about accusation are we?

I'm not nervous for me, I'm nervous for my sons. As we saw with several accusers against Kavanaugh, people will lie for all sorts of reasons.
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Sep, 2019 04:14 pm
GOP Jesus: "I'm sorry I can't save you; you have a pre-existing condition."
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Wed 4 Sep, 2019 04:23 pm
It is a fact that democrats support gun rights more than the GOP...

Why would rich old republicans who live in their ivory palaces surrounded by endangered species pachyderm want the protesting mob to have automatic weapons?

Even if the protesting mob is more ethical than the republican warmongering elite...
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 4 Sep, 2019 04:31 pm
@TheCobbler,
Wrong again. Most Democrats want to violate people's civil liberties for fun.
TheCobbler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Sep, 2019 04:33 pm
A very annoyed Mitch McConnell would like everyone to stop calling him 'Moscow Mitch'
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/politics/a-very-annoyed-mitch-mcconnell-would-like-everyone-to-stop-calling-him-moscow-mitch/ar-AAGLk9c

https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/69708374_1112962075569262_8508840073238675456_n.jpg?_nc_cat=105&_nc_oc=AQnASn38QhzVWL6OwPBV5tQuT08VzbaP7wcCk_f5bSBm6cBumeSrJ4hKXyYzKpEbBW28aKFM-9HdwAF59a3RXCeM&_nc_ht=scontent-ort2-2.xx&oh=3f3924fcfe4e92bc1a5962e4401fdd25&oe=5DCB4FA4
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 05/18/2024 at 10:17:20