50
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2019 02:15 pm
@TheCobbler,
Considering Brent Kavanaugh was innocent of everything he was accused of, she made the right choice to vote for him. The media still can't bring themselves to report the truth, they have a bias agenda.
neptuneblue
 
  3  
Reply Thu 29 Aug, 2019 05:29 pm
Democrats see golden opportunity to take Georgia Senate seat
BY JORDAIN CARNEY - 08/29/19 06:00 AM EDT 3,345

Democrats are feeling bullish about their chances to win a Senate seat in Georgia in the wake of GOP Sen. Johnny Isakson’s decision to retire.

The announcement, Democrats argue, gives them a golden opportunity to expand the Senate battleground map heading into 2020 and chip away at the GOP’s Senate firewall.

Nikema Williams, the chair of the Democratic Party of Georgia, immediately pledged that the state would be a must-watch “battleground” in 2020, saying after Isakson’s announcement that it “has never been clearer that the path for Democratic victory runs through Georgia.”

Georgia has typically been a safe Republican state, but Democrats made gains in House races in 2018 when Rep. Lucy McBath (D) defeated GOP Rep. Karen Handel in the state’s 6th Congressional District. The party also came close to winning the governorship when Stacey Abrams lost in a close race to Republican Gov. Brian Kemp.

Other stars may also be aligning for Democrats in Georgia.

The party believes the state’s demographics are moving in its direction, and President Trump’s low approval ratings have Democrats thinking he may leave other Republicans vulnerable.

In 2016, Trump defeated Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton by 5 percentage points in Georgia, but only won a little more than 50 percent of the vote. That’s given Democrats new hope of winning the state in the presidential race.

Even if that dream doesn’t come true for the party, Democrats like their chances of winning the open Senate seat in a year when Trump will be at the top of the ticket and Georgia Republicans will also be defending GOP Sen. David Perdue’s seat.

J.B. Poersch — the president of the Senate Majority PAC, an outside group aligned with Senate Democrats — said the open Senate race “increases our chances of retaking the majority.”

“I expect Georgia and both seats to be competitive in 2020,” he added.

The Isakson retirement complicates life for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who is doing everything in his power to keep the Senate majority in GOP hands.

Democrats need to pick up three or four seats, depending on which party controls the White House, to win back the Senate majority.

Though Republicans are defending 22 seats compared to Democrats' 12, most are viewed as safe bets for reelection. That leaves the Senate battleground map limited to a handful of states including Arizona, Colorado, Maine and North Carolina, where GOP Sens. Martha McSally, Cory Gardner, Susan Collins and Thom Tillis, respectively, are on the ballot. Republicans view Alabama, where Sen. Doug Jones (D) is running for reelection in a deep-red state, as their best chance for a pick-up.

Isakson’s retirement will set the stage for a special election that will be a “jungle primary,” and a likely run-off election if no one gets 50 percent next year, for the final two years of his term.

“I think what you really see is the floor rising for Democratic candidates ... and it just becoming increasingly competitive,” said a national Democratic strategist watching the Senate races. “It’s going to be a battleground next year.”

The strategist added that Georgia “is a fundamentally competitive state. It adds another path to the majority.”

If Democrats are able to pick up Isakson’s seat, or knock off Perdue, it would be the first time the state has sent a Democrat to the Senate since 2000, when Zell Miller was elected to finish out the term of Sen. Paul Coverdell (R), who died while in office.

Kyle Kondik, managing editor of Sabato’s Crystal Ball at the University of Virginia, said Democrats have been looking for ways to expand the Senate map and Isakson’s decision “puts another potentially vulnerable Republican seat on the board.”

Still, he said it won’t be easy.

“I think I would still rather be the Republican in that state,” Kondik said.

He said that historically the two Georgia seats are likely to swing in the same direction, meaning if Perdue wins, the GOP nominee to succeed Isakson would also likely win. The last time a state had both of its Senate seats up in the same election and the results split was 1966 in South Carolina.

Isakson is the fourth Republican senator to announce in recent months that he would retire. Sens. Pat Roberts (Kan.), Lamar Alexander (Tenn.) and Mike Enzi (Wyo.), who were each up for reelection in 2020, are also stepping down.

“This is yet another seat Republicans will need to defend next year in an increasingly competitive battleground where the president's approval has plunged by double digits since taking office,” said Stewart Boss, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

It’s unclear who will be the GOP nominee. Under state law, Kemp will be able to appoint someone to temporarily fill the seat once Isakson steps down at the end of the year.

Several Republican names are already being floated, including Rep. Doug Collins, Rep. Tom Graves, Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan, state Attorney General Chris Carr and Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue, a former governor of Georgia and David Perdue's first cousin.

“I’m not going to tell you this was a positive development by any stretch,” one GOP strategist said. “[But] I think Republicans start favorites to hold onto the seat.”

Republicans did catch a significant break on Wednesday when Abrams quickly announced that she would not jump into the race for Isakson’s seat. Democrats had also tried unsuccessfully to get Abrams, viewed as a rising star in the party, to run against Perdue.

“Without her in it, you know even some of the names that are being tossed around are not on her level,” the GOP strategist said.

A second GOP operative was more bullish, predicting that Democrats wouldn’t be able to field a strong challenger to make a play for Isakson’s seat. Asked if there was a Democrat besides Abrams that they were worried about, the operative quipped: “None.”

But Democrats view the state as competitive even if Abrams isn’t in the race, arguing her campaign in 2018 showed that the party can compete in the Southern state. Several names of potential candidates that are being publicly floated include McBath, former gubernatorial candidate Jason Carter, former Senate candidate Michelle Nunn, DeKalb County CEO Michael Thurmond and former congressional candidate Jon Ossoff.

“[It’s] fundamentally competitive without Abrams,” the Democratic strategist said, asked about comments from Republicans that the party lacks a bench of strong candidate to compete for the Senate seat.

National Democrats are also keeping a close eye on the field and laying down early goal posts.

Aimee Allison, founder of She the People, said following Isakson’s retirement announcement that Georgia was primed to “elect at least one Democratic Senator.”

“Women of color remain the Democratic party’s most loyal voters and are changing what is possible in politics. Abrams revolutionized Georgia’s political landscape,” she added. “To be successful in Georgia, Democrats need to support a candidate who captures the spirit of Abrams’ progressive campaign.”
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  4  
Reply Fri 30 Aug, 2019 07:34 pm

https://i.imgur.com/pM8uyNx.jpg
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Reply Sat 31 Aug, 2019 08:35 am
Quote:
This is an all-hands-on-deck moment for American democracy

This is no time to be on the sidelines.

Stacey Abrams: Stand up and be counted. “I do not want to serve in the Senate,” says the hugely popular former Georgia Democratic gubernatorial nominee.

Steve Bullock: Stand up and be counted. “My talents are best suited” to an executive role, says Montana’s well-liked Democratic governor.

Beto O’Rourke: Stand up and be counted. “That would not be good enough” to serve in the Senate, says the gifted former Democratic congressman from Texas.

Sorry, but what’s not “good enough” are those answers. The three could make all the difference in Democrats’ uphill quest to take the Senate next year. Instead, they choose to run vanity campaigns for president (or in Abrams’s case, await a vice presidential nod) or put themselves in line for a Cabinet post. Ordinarily, I’d respect their wishes to do what fulfills them or works best for their families or positions them for future success.

But these are not ordinary times. This is an all-hands-on-deck moment not just for Democrats but for American democracy. If the anti-Trump majority doesn’t prevail next year and resoundingly repudiate the hatred, isolation and drift toward autocracy, it won’t much matter what happens later. Abrams, Bullock and O’Rourke owe it to the country to end the reign of President Trump’s enablers in the Senate.

It’s easy to see why they’d prefer not to run for Senate. The Senate has become a toxic workplace, and service there unrewarding. That’s thanks in large part to the amorality of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). The majority leader and his caucus could have stood up to Trump’s indecency. Instead, he, and it, pursued power with no principles: breaking Senate rules, allowing Russia’s ongoing interference in U.S. elections, refusing to even consider legislation that could stop the mass shootings that are terrorizing America’s children. They have shown that they are too cowardly and too self-interested to be a check on Trump’s abuses.

But that’s all the more reason to run. If Trump somehow prevails next year, it’s crucial he not have a McConnell-led Senate to ratify his ruinous ways. And if Trump is to be defeated next year, it will be because the most capable people stepped up to challenge him — at all levels. Trumpism must be defeated resoundingly, and that means holding to account Republicans who failed to follow their conscience.

Even now, with still-strong employment numbers, polls show Trump’s Democratic challengers defeating him. If the economy tanks before the election (it’s only a matter of time because of the damage Trump has added to the nation’s finances, his politicization of monetary policy and his destabilization of international trade), there is the possibility of a thunderous repudiation of Trump — but only if Trump’s opposition goes all-in.

This isn’t just about Abrams, Bullock and O’Rourke; Democrats need to mount fierce challenges everywhere in case an electoral wave comes. Democrats, like-minded independents and disillusioned Republicans should be giving whatever small-dollar contributions they can to candidates, party committees and get-out-the-vote efforts, and volunteering to knock on doors or make calls or whatever else is needed.

And it isn’t just about Democrats. Government workers should remain at their posts regardless of how unpleasant the job has become to prevent yet more damage to federal agencies. Judges should postpone retirement rather than let Trump fill the judiciary with incompetents. And weary journalists and watchdog groups must keep up relentless scrutiny of the administration.

Some sunshine soldiers have already let down the cause, declining Democratic entreaties to run for the Senate in states such as Iowa and North Carolina, where Trump-enablers Joni Ernst and Thom Tillis, respectively, seek reelection. But none of those prospects had the potential to transform races in the way Bullock, Abrams and possibly O’Rourke could.

There’s still some hope that Bullock and O’Rourke, despite their disavowals of interest, will run for the Senate after they scratch their presidential itches. The case of Abrams is more perplexing. She has said it would be “arrogant” to think she’s the only Democrat who could win a Senate seat in Georgia. Yet it appears she’s holding out for a vice-presidential nomination. “I would be honored,” she told WBUR’s “On Point” on Tuesday.

With the retirement of the ailing Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), both Georgia Senate seats will be on the ballot next year. And the Democrats’ best candidate won’t run for either? That’s a gift to Trump’s enablers.

Why? For the “honor” of a vice- presidential nomination? Preserving herself for another office, another time? I hope Abrams reconsiders. History won’t be kind to those who stepped aside in democracy’s time of need.


WP
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2019 09:10 am
Over 40 Republicans Have Been Arrested As Potential Mass Shooters Since El Paso
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mass-shooting-plot-arrests-el-paso_n_5d66d1eae4b063c341f9f2da

The NRA has weakened the 2nd amendment...
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2019 12:24 pm
BETSY DEVOS IS THE EIGHTH TRUMP OFFICIAL TO USE PERSONAL EMAIL FOR OFFICIAL WHITE HOUSE BUSINESS
https://www.newsweek.com/betsy-devos-use-personal-email-work-trump-1431800


But, but, but, Hillary?!!! (cynical)
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2019 12:25 pm
THERE COULD BE A FINANCIAL CRASH BEFORE END OF TRUMP'S FIRST TERM, EXPERTS SAY, CITING LOOMING DEBTS
https://www.newsweek.com/stock-market-1134867

Who didn't see this coming?
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2019 12:40 pm
@Baldimo,
Where was it proven that Bet Kavanaugh wasn't guilty of anything he was accused of. The fact that him and Thomas were selected for the court just proves that the senate is populated with old white men who believe its their right to rape women.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2019 12:41 pm
@TheCobbler,
A minority of 2016 voters who elected this crook?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Sun 1 Sep, 2019 04:32 pm
@TheCobbler,
TheCobbler wrote:
The NRA has weakened the 2nd amendment...

Protecting our civil liberties strengthens them.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 12:06 am
@oralloy,
Protecting murderers weakens them.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 12:30 am
@MontereyJack,
Preventing you from violating people's civil liberties for fun does not protect a single murderer.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 04:59 am
@oralloy,
Remember Stephen Paddock who was not prevented from mas murder because he was not prevented from acquiring all the weapons he needed to do it. Thanks a lot for your concern for his civil liberties, oralloy.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 05:10 am
@MontereyJack,
You're welcome. I'm happy to continue opposing all efforts to reduce the massacres until progressives stop violating people's civil liberties, and progressives pay compensation to their victims.
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 05:49 am
@oralloy,
You gonna pay compensation for the true victims, those killed by gun violence? Thought not.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 06:04 am
@MontereyJack,
You're free to try to pass your gun laws without the support of moderates like me.

Good luck with that. Do you remember what happened when Obama devoted the entire first hundred days of his second term to attacking us?
ekename
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 07:35 am
If you wish to regain bicameral control of government and the presidency then you need to come up with a centre right Democrat leader whose mantra is to deliver lower taxes and higher wages through prosperity. I'd suggest you try a businessman. Tell the Democratic think tank to go right old men.
TheCobbler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 07:55 am
@oralloy,
Giving weapons of mass destruction to crazies is not protecting civil liberties idiot, it is weakening civil liberties.

Each mass shooting makes the argument against the second amendment stronger.

You and your greedy party are going to be the death of the second amendment.
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 07:56 am
DONALD TRUMP’S LIFESTYLE COULD COST TAXPAYERS NEARLY $1 BILLION
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/04/trump-lifestyle-cost-taxpayers-billion-dollars

A billion dollars to cart this turd around on a golf course.
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Sep, 2019 08:03 am

Ozzy Osbourne Bans Donald Trump From Using His Music With The Snarkiest Song Suggestion
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/ozzy-sharon-osbourne-donald-trump-music-ban_n_5d15dd9fe4b082e553678aec

[...] we are sending notice to the Trump campaign (or any other campaigns) that they are forbidden from using any of Ozzy Osbourne’s music in political ads or in any political campaigns. Ozzy’s music cannot be used for any means without approvals.

Osbourne also proposed that Trump “reach out” to musicians who support him to obtain permission to use their music instead.

He suggested Kanye West’s “Gold Digger,” Kid Rock’s “I Am The Bullgod,” and Ted Nugent’s “Stranglehold” as suitable replacements.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.13 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 06:56:23