40
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
TheCobbler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Feb, 2018 01:07 pm
Antigay pastor and wife arrested after he’s busted for luring kids with candy then molesting them
https://www.queerty.com/antigay-pastor-wife-arrested-busted-luring-kids-candy-molesting-20180201

The GOP's finest, Trump voters....
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Sat 3 Feb, 2018 11:21 am
CALIF & OREGON CROPS ROTTING IN FIELDS WITH NO WORKERS TO PICK THEM!
ENJOY THAT $5. TOMATO & NO STRAWBERRIES
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 3 Feb, 2018 11:32 am
Russians Brave Icy Temperatures to Protest Putin and Election
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/28/world/europe/russia-protests-navalny.html
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Feb, 2018 09:46 pm
Trump Hotel caught directly profiting off taxpayer dime
https://shareblue.com/trump-hotel-caught-directly-profiting-off-taxpayer-dime/

Yet another felony...

Trump makes Martha Stewart's insider trading look like she was caught stealing a piece of penny candy...
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 7 Feb, 2018 08:13 am
Online Fox News must be different than it's cable news broadcast.

Democrats flip deep-red Missouri state House seat, signal problems for GOP (Fox News)
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 7 Feb, 2018 09:09 am
@revelette1,
revelette1 wrote:
Online Fox News must be different than it's cable news broadcast.

No. Both are highly reputable.

It's merely that the left is completely delusional about Fox News, just as the left is completely delusional about most other things.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Thu 8 Feb, 2018 01:35 am
@oralloy,
Neither is "highly reputable"
Once again you mistake your opinion for fact.
Fox is purely a propaganda outlet for the rabid right. Reputable news it ain't..
oralloy
 
  -4  
Reply Thu 8 Feb, 2018 02:34 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Neither is "highly reputable"

Yes they are.


MontereyJack wrote:
Once again you mistake your opinion for fact.

Once again I am completely correct in every respect.


MontereyJack wrote:
Fox is purely a propaganda outlet for the rabid right. Reputable news it ain't..

Liberals always throw such a tantrum when Fox News presents facts that they don't want to hear.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Feb, 2018 01:02 pm
@oralloy,
Thinking the left is delusional is delusional.
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 8 Feb, 2018 08:53 pm
Dow Jones and S.&P. Slide Again, Dropping by More Than 4%
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/05/business/stocks-equities-dow-markets.html

8 years of the democrat's and Obama's economical gains soon to be erased, remember the Bush recession?

Republicans are not good for nothing, especially not the economy.

Trillions of dollars evaporated into thin air.
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2018 12:22 pm
@TheCobbler,
If you haven't noticed, the economy is going just fine, this is a market correction that they have been waiting on for the last 4 years.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2018 03:29 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
Liberals always throw such a tantrum when Fox News presents facts that they don't want to hear.


As soon as one hears an admission like that, ... .
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2018 05:43 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
Thinking the left is delusional is delusional.

I can cite actual delusional behavior from the left (contrast this with your failure to ever cite any instance of me being wrong):

The left's belief in imaginary obstruction statutes is entirely delusional.
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2018 07:12 pm
What about a Maximum Wage?
https://www.facebook.com/BigThinkdotcom/videos/10153825430428527/
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 Feb, 2018 07:18 pm
The U.S. Drops Out of the Top 10 in Innovation Ranking
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-22/south-korea-tops-global-innovation-ranking-again-as-u-s-falls

Guess who the mud hut dwelling towel heads are now?
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Feb, 2018 12:41 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy says:
Quote:

The left's belief in imaginary obstruction statutes is entirely delusional.

so you're claiming that all the republican senators who voted to impeach bill Clinton for obstruction of justice were delusional because those grounds were delusional? You are aware that makes you sound delusional?
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 10 Feb, 2018 12:55 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
I can cite actual delusional behavior from the left (contrast this with your failure to ever cite any instance of me being wrong): ...


I can cite actual delusional behavior from many people here, both right and left.

We can all agree that when a country, and its citizenry, sees this level of delusional behavior, it is not good for Dems or Repubs, or any of the folks of other parties.

We all can agree that denying hard science, denying actual fact, denying things that we can see with our own eyes is the very definition of delusional.

Here is perfect, indisputable evidence of said delusional behavior.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OmuzyWC60eE/hqdefault.jpg

And live, in a video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Reply Sun 11 Feb, 2018 07:24 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
so you're claiming that all the republican senators who voted to impeach bill Clinton for obstruction of justice were delusional because those grounds were delusional?

No. There is actually an obstruction statute that says it was against the law for Bill Clinton to send Betty Curry out to hide evidence from the Starr investigation.

What is imaginary is an obstruction statute that makes it against the law for the official who is in charge of an investigation to decide that the investigation should not be pursued.

Although as a side note, since the Democrats said it was OK for Bill Clinton to commit real actual obstruction, had Trump committed real actual obstruction, he would be above the law too.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Feb, 2018 10:24 pm
@MontereyJack,
More nonsense. Because Bill Clinton didn't get whAt YOU think he deserved hS bsolutely no legal bearing on whatever hzppens to Trump..The lawgets restrted every time someone is accused of breaking it. It's eually valid every new time. nd s usual you're missing the point on firing. It's legal to own a gun. It's l,egal to fire a gun. But if you do those two perfectly legal ativities to murder someone, it's still a felony. Actions hve consequence. If Trump fires Mueller that is questionably legal, but that legal action can still result in obstruction of justice, just like owning and firing a sun, legl activites, can still get you the electric chair. And if he triew it, he's gonna precipitate a political firestorm and constitutional crisis he will not win.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 12 Feb, 2018 01:19 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
More nonsense. Because Bill Clinton didn't get whAt YOU think he deserved hS bsolutely no legal bearing on whatever hzppens to Trump..The lawgets restrted every time someone is accused of breaking it. It's eually valid every new time.

I realize the Democrats would love to place themselves above the law while still holding everyone else accountable, but no one is going to let them get away with that.

Since it was OK for Bill Clinton to break the law, it's also OK for Republican Presidents to break the law.


MontereyJack wrote:
nd s usual you're missing the point on firing. It's legal to own a gun. It's l,egal to fire a gun. But if you do those two perfectly legal ativities to murder someone, it's still a felony. Actions hve consequence. If Trump fires Mueller that is questionably legal,

There is no question at all. The Constitution gives Trump absolute power to fire any person in the executive branch of the US government for any reason he wants.


MontereyJack wrote:
but that legal action can still result in obstruction of justice, just like owning and firing a sun, legl activites, can still get you the electric chair.

It is rather a stretch to begin with to suggest that it could be obstruction for the official in charge of an investigation to decide not to pursue it. Officials decide not to pursue investigations every day in America.

But if it were ever obstruction of justice for the President to exercise his presidential powers, the obstruction statute would be instantly unconstitutional and invalid. The Constitution trumps any statute.

And since the courts are required to interpret the law in a manner that does not violate the Constitution if it is possible to do so, the odds of any court interpreting the obstruction statute in a manner that interferes with Trump's ability to exercise his constitutional powers, are exactly zero.


MontereyJack wrote:
And if he triew it, he's gonna precipitate a political firestorm and constitutional crisis he will not win.

Trump has the Constitution on his side. I know the Democrats would love to overthrow our Constitution, but no one is going to let them do that.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2018 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 02/21/2018 at 11:09:07