@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:What a truly remarlably askew screed. To oralloyh, acting according to the law is abusing the law.
When the Democrats use the law to conduct unjustified criminal investigations into people who disagree with them, that is not acting according to the law. It is very much an abuse of the law.
MontereyJack wrote:The Mueller knvestigations are perfectly legal. Remember the GOP supported them because serious questions have been raised about illegal I'm=nterference in merican elections.
The question of Russian interference in our elections would justify an investigation into what they did, what our vulnerabilities are, and how do we fix things so that it never happens again.
That is exactly what is NOT being done. When the Democrats hijacked this issue to use it as a weapon against Trump, that was the end of efforts to understand the threat and protect future elections.
MontereyJack wrote:But if they get too close to a liar, cheater, scamster that oralloy supports, then tehy become a witch hunt.
They are witch hunts because they are unjustified investigations solely meant to damage people who disagree with the Democrats.
MontereyJack wrote:No oralloy, they are a necessary, deserved search for the truth.
Conducting criminal investigations into people just because they disagree with the Democrats is a gross abuse of the law. That behavior is justification for outlawing the Democratic Party.
MontereyJack wrote:And the Trumpists have done some extremely shady things over the years, which are coming to light out of the darkness Trump tries to cast over them.
If your witch hunt manages to find some minor wrongdoing somewhere (and that's still a huge if), it won't be nearly as bad as what the Democrats let Bill Clinton get away with.
MontereyJack wrote:Saying the Russians should deal with American mokney laujndering is sheer nonsense.
When Russian criminals make money from Russian victims and launder the money, that's not American money laundering. That is Russian money laundering.
MontereyJack wrote:The money laundering was a crime, hen done for the American Mafia, and widely praised bor being prosecuted.
I'm guessing it was the
American government that was primarily interested in the
American mafia's money laundering?
MontereyJack wrote:It's a crime when done for the benefit of Russians too, and an American crime,
When Russian criminals make money from Russian victims and then launder the money, that is mainly a Russian crime.
MontereyJack wrote:and it raises red flags, and it looks like Jared Kushner is going down for it.
Only if he can be prosecuted on state charges within the statute of limitations. And if that happens, Trump will likely be spurred to finally do something about the Democratic Party.
MontereyJack wrote:What happened to someone else, e.g. Bill Clinton has absolutely no bearing on what happens to someone else who commits a crime. We don't stop prosecuting murder simply because O.J or George Zimmermangot off. If the Trumps did the crime, they should do the time. Gods willing they will.
Bad example. George Zimmerman didn't even do anything wrong. He is a hero who prevented a black man from going on a killing spree, and the Democrats tried to lynch him for that.
Anyway, while I know that the Democrats would love to always place themselves above the law and still condemn everyone else, no one is going to let them get away with doing that. They placed Bill Clinton above the law, and now they have no standing to complain about wrongdoing by anyone else.
