@Baldimo,
I actually agree with Baldi's first point.
but I wanted to take issue with blowjob's implied assumption that the party is more important than the people who support it - and party DNA overrides the will of those supporters.
The Republican and Democratic parties would be unrecognisable to their founders, surely you know that much history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_parties_in_the_United_States
Like the Tea Party is traditional GOP?
And to lightly disagree with Baldi's second point: thinking liberalism (whatever the frig that means) is a project of 60s universities is cart before horse.
All that changed was increased access to information and the channels it flows through (both through increased university attendance and broader technological changes).
With those settings change the the percentage of the population with broad empathy found common cause around issues that existing power structures either ignored or fomented - from racial exploitation to gender subjugation.
Neither conservative or 'liberal' is exclusively in or out of this group. The biggest difference is the rate of change those two labels find acceptable.
True conservatives don't fear or fight change, they just want it to come in an orderly organic fashion driven by the majority - not thrust upon an unwilling populace to the detriment of institutions.
And to really disagree with Baldi - why are college 'safe spaces' "nonsene"?
So you advocate for violence against the LGBT community? Or at least not to do anything about it.
I guess I can untick the empath box on your profile.