@RABEL222,
That three million represents only about 5% of the votes already made.
About 72 percent of Californians eligible to vote have registered to cast their ballots in Tuesday's presidential primary, marking a record number for the state, according to Secretary of State Alex Padilla.
“In the 45 days leading up to the voter registration deadline, there was a huge surge in voter registration — total statewide voter registration increased by nearly 650,000," Padilla said in a statement, reports The Hill. "Part of this surge was fueled through social media, as Facebook sent a reminder to all California users to register to vote.”
On Friday, Padilla's office released a report showing that just more than 17.9 million voters were registered as of the state's May 23 deadline, marking the most registered voters the state has ever had heading into a primary election.
About 45 percent of the state's voters registered as Democrats; 27 percent registered as Republicans, and unaffiliated voters make up another 23 percent.
Special: Barb Walters Sits Down With Dr Oz and Leaves Viewers Speechless
According to the report, there were about 17.2 million registered voters heading into the 2012 presidential primary.
Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are fighting almost neck-and-neck for control of California for a prize that won't likely deliver Sanders the delegates he needs to clinch the Democratic nomination, but would bolster his refusal to leave the race before the party's convention in Philadelphia.
Breaking News at Newsmax.com
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/California-voters/2016/06/04/id/732326/#ixzz4Ai9A8hSc
How about letting the voters of California have a say first. Thats about 8 million registered Democratic voters? Or how about giving millions of New Jersey Democrats a chance to vote?
How about following the DNC rules on who gets to get their name put up at the convention???
"If a Democratic primary candidate can win 59 percent of the Party’s “pledged” (primary- and caucus-won) delegates or more, the primary is decided by pledged delegates; if a Democratic primary candidate fails to meet that threshold, they are considered by DNC electoral processes to be a weak front-runner and the nomination is finally decided, instead, by “superdelegates” — who can express support for a candidate at any time, but cannot commit themselves to anyone (i.e., cast a binding vote for any candidate) until the Democratic National Convention in July; superdelegates are unlike pledged delegates in this regard because, while pledged delegates also do not vote until the Party’s convention, they cannot change their votes from what their state’s voting results pledged them to be — though it has been argued by some that in fact they can change their votes at the Convention, with this argument most recently having been advanced by Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2008."
(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/seth-abramson/how-to-explain-the-sanders_b_10206250.html)
