Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

BillW wrote:

Brandon, you've turned into a comedian in your old age. Way to go!

Hope to see you change your jokes though. It isn't quality to turn a punch line on the obvious.......

"It's obvious" is not a valid argument. You state that Trump is buddies with the Russians but cannot offer a particle of evidence that it's true. You lose the argument.

Brandon9000 wrote:

BillW wrote:

Brandon, you've turned into a comedian in your old age. Way to go!

Hope to see you change your jokes though. It isn't quality to turn a punch line on the obvious.......

"It's obvious" is not a valid argument. You state that Trump is buddies with the Russians but cannot offer a particle of evidence that it's true. You lose the argument.

Well, it’s hard to make a case if some people don’t consider things like private meetings with Putin that excluded stenographers and translators as at all suspicious.

Brandon9000 wrote:

BillW wrote:

Brandon, you've turned into a comedian in your old age. Way to go!

Hope to see you change your jokes though. It isn't quality to turn a punch line on the obvious.......

"It's obvious" is not a valid argument. You state that Trump is buddies with the Russians but cannot offer a particle of evidence that it's true. You lose the argument.

Yours was obviously a joke, but the joke denies the obvious facts; therefore, the jokes on you!

What? You're now asserting that Trump had a meeting with Putin with no translators present? How would they understand each other? That doesn't even make sense.

You have said:

1. "But the post truly was not about paying more than one should...but about paying LESS THAN ONE SHOULD."

2. "...seems to have paid so little despite his supposed wealth."

3. "It is obvious that the abomination paid much less than a guy like him should have paid."

But you also said:

"I have no idea of what he paid in taxes."

You are accusing him of paying too little in taxes, despite admitting that you have "no idea of what he paid." Don't you think that you should know if someone is guilty, before you publicly accuse him of doing something immoral? Accusing someone of something immoral when you don't know if he did it or not is itself immoral.

Trump in his 2016 campaign asked his supporters, What have you got to lose by voting for him?

Well, now we know.

Their life, their economy, their allies, their healthcare, their sane government, their freedom, clean air and their self respect...

Many are too stupid to see this and they will hang on until every last thing is gone.

Brandon, when a man pays thousands in lawyer fees to conceal his tax returns, don't you even ask yourself the very simple question, "WHY?".

You are corrupt too...

Brandon, when a man pays thousands in lawyer fees to conceal his tax returns, don't you even ask yourself the very simple question, "WHY?".

You are corrupt too...

What is unethical is denying obvious facts because they counter your opinion.

What is unethical is denying obvious facts because they counter your opinion.

You can stop after the, "I do not think".

You don't think, because you are stupid...