50
   

Turning The Ballot Box Against Republicans

 
 
RABEL222
 
  5  
Reply Thu 22 Oct, 2015 02:38 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
I will also admit to some discomfort, but I still use them when nothing else is available.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 22 Oct, 2015 02:59 pm
@RABEL222,
We have already posted the truth of those statements and the US does not spend anywhere near 55% of the US budget on the military or homeland security. At most we spend about 20%.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/07/everything-chuck-hagel-needs-to-know-about-the-defense-budget-in-charts/

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/MS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Thu 22 Oct, 2015 03:27 pm
@Baldimo,
Quote:
We have already posted the truth of those statements and the US does not spend anywhere near 55% of the US budget on the military or homeland security. At most we spend about 20%.

And lets also point out the $220 billion a year (180 VA, 50 DOD) of the defense budget that goes to healthcare, which is not going away no matter what we do on our defense posture. THis is another way that we see out of control healthcare costs due to bad management eating the nations wallet. It is now 25% of the defense budget, getting worse fast, and projected to massively outpace inflation as far as the eye can see because no one is even talking about dealing with the problem.
RABEL222
 
  4  
Reply Thu 22 Oct, 2015 05:56 pm
@Baldimo,
Liar, liar, liar, liar, liar. We did have this discussion and as usual you refused to acknowledge the facts presented because they were not agreeable to your perceived opinion. In your eyes your opinion trumps any facts. In sane people thats considered a lie.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 03:53 am
@RABEL222,
They'll not be happy until they get it all.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 03:56 am
@hawkeye10,
So you don't think spending on military health care counts, huh? Then the cost of employee health care shouldn't count in consumer prices, either.

Boy, you are stupid.
bobsal u1553115
 
  4  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 04:04 am
@Baldimo,
You called him a "closet Muslem", bigot, because you hate Muslems. Hating Muslims - thats the bigotry part. "Accusing" someone of being a member of a class of people is race baiting, behavior of a race baiting bigot.

Out of your own 'mouth', you're a race bating bigot.
hawkeye10
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 04:08 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
So you don't think spending on military health care counts

I was saying that it is not discretionary moron. Now that I know I will try to dumb things down a little more for you.
TheCobbler
 
  5  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 04:23 am
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/12009711_10207679188320179_1787702278750328230_n.jpg?oh=9a67ee062f24ae6811d1b135f961153e&oe=56BD1ED2

GOP skullduggery! Leave Hillary alone!
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 04:25 am
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye wrote:
I was saying that it is not discretionary moron. Now that I know I will try to dumb things down a little more for you.


You could smarten up...
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  6  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 04:36 am
@hawkeye10,
The wars are discretionary, the wounded derived were discretionary, too. No discretionary war, no wounded. You are a ding bat. It hasn't been dumbed down enough for you to understand it yet.

If you don't think vets health is discretionary, then why are we veterans victims of you non serving Teapublicans' budget dramas? Why do you warmongering slackers keep wanting to cut VA medical budgets?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 04:51 am
@hawkeye10,
If you dumb it down any more, all we'll be left with are grunts and shrieks.
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 05:06 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Re: hawkeye10 (Post 6053759)
If you dumb it down any more, all we'll be left with are grunts and shrieks.


Too late.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  6  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 05:07 am
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CR4gAxqUcAEn3Hj.jpg
0 Replies
 
TheCobbler
 
  6  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 05:34 am
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/12065718_10153351020948661_676413396886353764_n.jpg?oh=ae1d3e0c8add63b0c547409b6da8aa7c&oe=56CCDB05
TheCobbler
 
  4  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 05:36 am
https://scontent-lga3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpa1/v/t1.0-9/12122930_897389650316969_71968399160177725_n.jpg?oh=06313554b21d487379ff52e8f78dc0fa&oe=56C2D818
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 06:30 am
@TheCobbler,
Let's go back even further and look at Bill Clinton also.

Shall we list a few here:

1993 – The first World Trade Center bombing
1995 – Attempted crashing of plane on White House
1995 – Oklahoma City bombing
1996 – Khobar Towers bombing – Saudi Arabia
1998 – U.S. Embassy bombings Kenya/Tanzania
2000 – USS Cole Bombing - Yemen
bobsal u1553115
 
  5  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 07:10 am
@woiyo,
You didn't get a complete enough picture:

http://s3.amazonaws.com/dk-production/images/65458/large/diplomatic-attacks4.png
hawkeye10
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 07:13 am
@bobsal u1553115,
What is a "diplomatic target?". Ya gotta define strange terms before you use them.
bobsal u1553115
 
  3  
Reply Fri 23 Oct, 2015 07:18 am
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
What is a "diplomatic target?".


Conventional wisdom is wrong. There is such a thing as a 'dumb question'. google it, dummy.

http://wp.vcu.edu/hsep/2013/09/03/more-than-500-attacks-on-us-diplomatic-targets-since-1970-study-finds/

More Than 500 Attacks On US Diplomatic Targets Since 1970, Study Finds
September 3, 2013News and Updates

Diplomatic Targets– A new study by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) found between 1970 and 2012 there were 521 terrorist attacks on US diplomatic targets overseas, including embassies, consulates and personnel in 92 countries.

Which leads to this:


http://www.hstoday.us/briefings/daily-news-analysis/single-article/more-than-500-attacks-on-us-diplomatic-targets-since-1970-study-finds/cdfb9d557de54dad19ffc32910c6d8a8.html

More Than 500 Attacks on US Diplomatic Targets since 1970, Study Finds

By: Anthony Kimery

08/21/2013 ( 9:52am)


A new study by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) found between 1970 and 2012 there were 521 terrorist attacks on US diplomatic targets overseas, including embassies, consulates and personnel in 92 countries.



The study comes on the heels of the State Department’s decision earlier this month to issue a worldwide travel alert and close nearly two dozen embassies and consulates in the Middle East and North Africa due to intelligence streams indicating potential attacks by Al Qaeda and affiliated organizations in the Arabian Peninsula.



Between 1970 and 2012, terrorist attacks targeting diplomatic facilities have resulted in nearly 500 deaths, almost half of which (43 percent) took place in the August 7, 1998 Al Qaeda attack on the US Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya, the START report said.



In the Nairobi attack, a suicide truck bomb exploded outside the US Embassy, killing 213 people, including 12 Americans. Four thousand people were injured. A coordinated bombing by Al Qaeda occurred at the US Embassy in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.



Since the US Embassy attacks in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, there have been 81 attacks against US diplomatic targets in 35 countries, according to the START report, based on its Global Terrorism Database (GTD).



For 34 of these attacks, the GTD “identified a perpetrator group,” START found, noting that “Most of the perpetrators of these attacks belong to the Al Qaeda network.”



The Department of Homeland Security's Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) supports the efforts of START through a Center of Excellence program based at the University of Maryland. The mission of START is to provide science-based knowledge about the human causes and consequences of terrorism.



Between 1970 and 2012, START’s GTD found that there were more than 2,700 terrorist attacks on US targets abroad that caused more than 3,000 deaths (both US and foreign nationals), and of these attacks, 17.5 percent took place within the past decade.



More than half (54.5 percent) of all attacks on US targets abroad were bombings, 14.8 percent were armed assaults, 10.7 percent were kidnappings and 8.9 percent were facility/infrastructure attacks, the START study found. Assassinations represent 6.5 percent of attacks on US targets abroad and the remaining tactics include hijackings, hostage taking (barricade) incidents and unarmed assaults.



The vast majority of attacks on US targets abroad were non-lethal (70.3 percent), START found, but 52 attacks incurred more than 10 fatalities and three individual attacks in particular resulted in more than 200 fatalities.



On Aug. 2, 2013 the State Department issued an alert to Americans traveling abroad, particularly in the Middle East and North Africa, citing potential threats from Al Qaeda and affiliated organizations in the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP. The alert referenced a wide variety of potential tactics and targets, and remains in effect throughout August.



On Aug. 4, the State Department released a subsequent statement indicating that out of an “abundance of caution,” diplomatic posts in Abu Dhabi, Amman, Cairo, Riyadh, Dhahran, Jeddah, Doha, Dubai, Kuwait, Manama, Muscat, Sana’a, Tripoli, Antananarivo, Bujumbura, Djibouti, Khartoum, Kigali and Port Louis will remain closed following the Eid celebration, through, Aug. 10.



On Aug. 6, the State Department issued a warning to Americans traveling in Yemen and announced a reduction in emergency US government personnel in Yemen. In light of these events, START compiled its background information on terrorist attacks against US targets abroad, attacks on US diplomatic targets in particular and the recent activity of AQAP using data from START’s GTD.





Follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/anthonykimery

And these are two right wing Teapublican sources. Getting any clues yet?

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.26 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 12:52:27