1
   

Liberals talk quite a lot.

Forums: Politics, Whining
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 04:38 pm
plainoldme wrote:
craven -- Remember the cartoon which featured two women in 50s style shirt waists and hair dos, standing on a stair with a man's face in the foreground? One woman tells the other, Careful, he's anti-choice . . . or something similiar? Always hated the hypocrisy of the right.

Based on my own experience and my brother's experience with a short lived time in the Baptist church and the stories a former room mate told me and the warnings to never go to a YR meeting. . . and more. It was sort of common girl talk during the 60s and I have to admit that I love reminding people about it.


But the lefty lads weren't randy, drooling and trying to unhook bras?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 04:55 pm
cavfancier wrote:
patiodog wrote:
What's the 60s?


Ask the bunny, if she remembers.


Yes - but I was wittle. And I started late.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:01 pm
Craven de Kere wrote:
But the lefty lads weren't randy, drooling and trying to unhook bras?


I dunno about the 60's, but in the 70's the lefty boys were bein' all respectful, asking if they could kiss a woman. Forget about being randy and trying to unhook bras without persmission. The righty boys didn't ask anything, except for directions home the next day.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:08 pm
ehBeth wrote:
Craven de Kere wrote:
But the lefty lads weren't randy, drooling and trying to unhook bras?


I dunno about the 60's, but in the 70's the lefty boys were bein' all respectful, asking if they could kiss a woman. Forget about being randy and trying to unhook bras without persmission. The righty boys didn't ask anything, except for directions home the next day.



Not MY lefty boys!

But they CERTAINLY never drooled.

And unhooking bras permission was always at least implicit.

Mind you, I wore a cunning front-fastening one to confuse 'em....
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:10 pm
Beth,

Um... what kind of data sampling are we talking about?
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:10 pm
dlowan wrote:

Mind you, I wore a cunning front-fastening one to confuse 'em....


Cunning stunt.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:11 pm
errrr, i can't say too much. you never know where hamburger might be lurking.

but i can say - there was a chart, with an interesting key system.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:12 pm
Craven de Kere wrote:
dlowan wrote:

Mind you, I wore a cunning front-fastening one to confuse 'em....


Cunning stunt.



Perverse Rrick!
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:14 pm
dlowan wrote:
Mind you, I wore a cunning front-fastening one to confuse 'em....


Didja ever have one of those sleeveless tops that had a zipper under the arm? The ultimate in date foolers. I still like 'em. They can cause an absolute panic.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:14 pm
Lol! We used to have the Left Ready Reckoner!

Mind you, it was for both genders, and no intimate comments allowed!
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:18 pm
Quote:
But the lefty lads weren't randy, drooling and trying to unhook bras?


What bras? Didn't lefty lads date lefty lasses?
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:18 pm
ehBeth wrote:
dlowan wrote:
Mind you, I wore a cunning front-fastening one to confuse 'em....


Didja ever have one of those sleeveless tops that had a zipper under the arm? The ultimate in date foolers. I still like 'em. They can cause an absolute panic.



Nah - I found the front fastening bra cruel enough.

Actually, to be very honest, I only ever used it in such a way twice - and, though it was mean, there were VERY extenuating circumstances. VERY.

Normally, I would assist rapidly, and invisibly, if the faintest trace of confusion showed itself. One does NOT wish to humiliate folk in such a situation - and, since that bra was for the very low neckline outfits, one's beloved tended to be quite enthusiastic on the occasions when the bra was needed.....but, this is WAY TMI!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:20 pm
patiodog wrote:
Quote:
But the lefty lads weren't randy, drooling and trying to unhook bras?


What bras? Didn't lefty lads date lefty lasses?


Some of us are not made for bralessness, wher'ere the winds of change may blow, I did not want them hanging low.....
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:21 pm
You are such a baby Rolling Eyes
A panicky fella can be a lot of fun Very Happy
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:24 pm
Quote:
Some of us are not made for bralessness, wher'ere the winds of change may blow, I did not want them hanging low.....


So third-world chic stopped at huaraces and ponchos, huh?
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:27 pm
Craven de Kere wrote:
Here are some others who were not yet mentioned:

These two are non-partisan but with very strong conservative leanings:

Phoenix32890 (11124)
au1929 (5826)

Stout conservatives:

roger(5551)
husker (5281)
cjhsa (4582)
Rae (4512)
fishin' (4227)
New Haven (3816)
Misti26 (3722)
steissd (3393)
perception (2902)
Brand X (2063)
OCCOM BILL (1915)


Now really! Well, okay, roger is conservative in this context. The context of a2k.

POOF! AU is a conservative. It's magic. He's been a stout supporter of our troops in Iraq after, and only after, they were committed to action.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:32 pm
Yeah, but troops in Iraq ain't a measure of conservatism.

He's non-partisan alright, but ya gotta admit he has a conservative streak, (e.g. Israel, fiscal conservatism, immigration, minorities....).
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:52 pm
patiodog wrote:
Quote:
Some of us are not made for bralessness, wher'ere the winds of change may blow, I did not want them hanging low.....


So third-world chic stopped at huaraces and ponchos, huh?


Lol! I was never left enough for third world chic! I am but a mere wishy washy social democrat!
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:54 pm
ehBeth wrote:
You are such a baby Rolling Eyes
A panicky fella can be a lot of fun Very Happy


Only if they are laughing at it - and then there is no real panic, eh?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jun, 2004 05:58 pm
oh, i wanted them to feel a bit of real panic. most of them were right-wing, after all :wink:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Liberals talk quite a lot.
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 09:42:57
▲ ▼