1 in 5 women get raped?

In an era that trys to pretend that all aspects of use of power in sex is despicable, sure

& And then in April this year, Monis was charged by sex crimes squad detectives with the indecent and sexual assault of a woman in western Sydney in 2002.

Police allege that Monis was a self-proclaimed "spiritual healer" who operated out of premises on Station Street at Wentworthville.

News of his arrest prompted more victims to come forward and Monis was hit with an additional 40 charges in October.

It is alleged that Monis placed ads in local newspapers offering "spiritual consultation".

The media will report it the same way they reported the guns purchased without a background check story. They won't. They will continue to allow a false premise to be talked about and used as political ammo.

Ditto for our primary schools by written policy busting down all little boys who dont act like prim and proper little girls.

Quote:

Ditto for our primary schools by written policy busting down all little boys who dont act like prim and proper little girls.

All the little boys being put on ritalin. Ritalin is the drug of choice by feminists to "control" "toxic" masculinity from an early age.

It is not the little boys who are the problem most of the time,

For what it's worth, though, Rolling Stone's fundamental error was its choice not to contact or even identify the men said to have raped Jackie;

“I am upset with that aspect of it, but I also know that she was trying to come from a point of advocacy,” Pinkleton said. “But as a reporter, you can't be like an advocate and support a story and listen to it and think everything is true and then report on it without trying to figure out if it's true. My job as an advocate was never to question Jackie's story or question the details, because I didn't need to. But the role that she's in as a reporter, she needed to do that."

Wrong, the fundamental problem was reporting as fact something that they had no right to assume was fact, and also never making any effort to determine if what they were claiming as fact was indeed factual.

So has anyone found out anything new about "Jackie" from UVA? Does anyone know if she'll be held financially responsible for all the vandalism caused by her lies? Or financially responsible for defamation?

She could be sued by the fraternity, or by individuals from the fraternity. They could also sue Rolling Stone and the university. It is up to them whether and who they sue however. They could decide not to sue anyone.

So has anyone found out anything new about "Jackie" from UVA

I think it is safe to say that there is a media embargo on any information about Jackie. The feminists over the years have done a good job of scaring everyone away from looking into the credibility of females who accuse males of sexual assaults. It tends to get in the way of the conviction rate, which as we all know is the only thing that matters to them. How many times have we heard " it does not matter that this underaged girl had a .20 BAC, was earlier in the evening seen pole dancing for the guys in her slut uniform of the evening, nor that at 2 am she went with her BF home to his house and crawled into bed naked with him....she says that she was raped, so she must have been. And shame on you all for trying to slut shame her by publishing this information about the events earlier in the evening THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS MAN RAPING HER! Only the rapist has anything to do with rape, how many times to we need to tell you this before you get with the program"??

I hope somebody involved with either the frats or the university really rakes her over the coals. If they decide not to sue, that's just going to further the message that it's OK to make false accusations.