25
   

1 in 5 women get raped?

 
 
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 03:11 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
looking for it.


?????????????????????????
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 03:44 pm
@BillRM,
That shot over your head did it? You've just admitted doing a google search for child pornography on Tumblr. That's looking for it.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 03:49 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
That shot over your head did it? You've just admitted doing a google search for child pornography on Tumblr. That's looking for it.


No my stupid friend I did a search to see if child porn was a problem on tumblr and if there had been cases of child porn being placed on tumblr not for the child porn itself.

Google does not give pointers to child porn itself.

I know the difference is on the very borderline of your intellect but do try to understand the difference.....................
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 04:03 pm
@izzythepush,
I agree, creeps me out.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 04:10 pm
@revelette2,
Quote:
I agree, creeps me out.


Please do not tell me that we have another person of limited intellect that does not know the difference between searching to see if there is a record of child porn being a problem on a website and searching for such porn on that website.

Shaking my head in a sad manner.
0 Replies
 
firefly
 
  3  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 04:13 pm
@izzythepush,
I can't believe this interchange...

Quote:
Hawkeye Quote:

BTW: I have in the last year seen more child porn than I had seen in over a decade, on Tumblr.

BillRM Quote:
Warning to you and anyone else for that matter running across what can be consider child porn when surfing the net could cause you a serous future problems.

Most everything you see is save in the browser cache with no need for you to save the material yourself.

If then someone with a little knowledge examine your hard drive and come across this material you can be facing a not minor legal problem.

That is just one reason I have my browser in a sandbox and everything is over written once I close the browser.

To say nothing of having the drive encrypted so once the power is off I am the only one in the world able to access it again.

One poor young man was convicted of having child porn on the basic of one repeat one thumbnail of a jpg that was no longer on his drive.


One sleazebag admits to looking at child porn, the other tells him that's why he has his computer so heavily protected and encrypted, so child pornography, he might just allegedly "run across" Rolling Eyes, can't be detected in his browser.

It's touching how these perverts look out for each other...
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 04:21 pm
@revelette2,
For your and Izzy understanding this is the first results of a search using the keywords [Tumblr child porn].

Google does not give links to child porn on tumblr or anywhere else for that matter.

Quote:


http://www.wusa9.com/story/news/local/prince-william-county/2014/10/14/bristow-virginia-child-pornography-underage-boys-pictures-tumblr/17260641/

BRISTOW, Va. (WUSA9) -- Two Virginia men face multiple child porn charges after police received a tip about naked pictures of underage boys that were uploaded to Tumblr.

Billy Scott McGhee, 47, of Bristow and Aaron N. Landers, 36, of Bristow were arrested after a search of their home located at 13580 Dodsworth Drive, according to Prince William County police.

Police began investigating on August 8 after receiving a tip through the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children "about nude and sexual images of underage boys being uploaded to a specific account via the social media site called Tumblr," officials said.

The account was traced to the men's home, where police executed a search warrant and found multiple electronic devices with illicit images of minors, according to officials.

The ages and identities of the victims are unknown.

McGhee is charged with nine counts of possession of child pornography and one count of distribution of child pornography. Landers is charged with five counts of possession of child pornography. Both men are being held without bond.
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 04:32 pm
@BillRM,
Are you salivating just thinking of those naked boys? Or do you prefer looking at naked little girls in sexually provocative photos and videos?

You have an inordinate interest in child pornography, and claiming the viewer/consumer really isn't harming or exploiting children. No one buys your crappy rationalizations and excuses--the entire child porn industry, from the producers to the consumers, is built on the sexual exploitation and abuse of children, you sleazy creep.
hawkeye10
 
  3  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 04:39 pm
@firefly,
Quote:
One sleazebag admits to looking at child porn


I dont look for it, it shows up in porn feeds that I look at. Every so often I see a pic and think "no way is that female 17/18, 14/15 tops". I dont see 12 and under though, which in the 90's would pop up on porn sites unannounced. .

As an aside, I am seeing bestiality on Tumblr....gotta figure they are going to try to put a stop to that.
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 04:53 pm
@hawkeye10,
Do you not love Izzy and Firefly always willing to see the worst in anyone who dare to disagree with them?

Yes for those who look for adult porn on the net questionable porn does come up now and then and if there is any question I wiped the file. Not erase the file but wiped the file as in overwrite the file that never come out of a separate encrypt volume.
hawkeye10
 
  3  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 04:58 pm
@BillRM,
So far as I know I am safe so long as I dont try to download the pic, though I do recall a case about a year ago that calls this analysis into question, something that had the state putting google search terms and viewing together to allegedly make a crime.
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 05:05 pm
@hawkeye10,
There was once an interesting case of a man being prosecuted for the crime of manufacturing child porn due to what was claimed to be an underage actress.

The prosecutor place a expert on female sexual development on the stand that stated the the actress could not be anywhere near legal age when the film was produce.

All was going well for the prosecution until the woman repeat the woman show up with a passport and a birth certificate showing she was 19 at the time of the filming.
hawkeye10
 
  3  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 05:12 pm
@BillRM,
How in the hell is the US government going to know how old a russian girl in Russia is? Putin is not going to cooperate, he just announced that he is ended a nuclear safety deal that is almost 20 years old because he is no longer interested in cooperating with the West due to disrespect to include lies on our part. I have seen a lot of females nakid and a lot of porn, these are underaged girls showing up on Tumblr.
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 05:15 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
So far as I know I am safe so long as I dont try to download the pic,


Hawkeye it is my understanding that people have gotten into trouble over what was found in their browser cache with no evidence that they try to save the files.

Also there was a news story of how a state law had been "repair" to make it a crime to view such material without downloading it.

To me it is simpler to be safe by running my browser in a sandbox that wipe it content after closing the browser and this sandbox give great protection from malware.

The free version is more then enough at sandboxie.com and you might wish to look into it assuming you are running a windows computer.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Mon 17 Nov, 2014 05:20 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
How in the hell is the US government going to know how old a russian girl in Russia is?


The government is using so call experts on sexual development and a scale of sexual development by the name of the tanner scale.

Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tanner_scale

The scale has been criticized by the pornography industry for its potential to lead to false child pornography convictions, such as in the case when government experts used it to assert that pornographic actress Lupe Fuentes was underage. Fuentes personally appeared at the trial and provided documentation that showed that the DVDs in question were legally produced.[5][6] The author of the classification system himself has argued that age classification using the Tanner stages represents invalid use.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Tue 18 Nov, 2014 04:01 am
@firefly,
I think BillRM and Hawkeye are victims of their own bullshit. People don't come across such material everyday, even when searching for mainstream pornography. As for Hawkeye's lauded claim that he's only interested in consensual sex, that may well be true in his personal life, but it doesn't seem that such considerations are taken into account when viewing images.

Such claims, once more, to be the victim of crumbling East/West relations, because the Russian made video he watched depicting a graphic rape didn't clearly state the victim was over 18, should be treated with utter contempt. 'How was I to know she was only 8, I just thought she was underdeveloped,' isn't an argument that would wash with a normal person.

The sad truth is that child protection is unfunded, and a lot of paedophiles will go unpunished, which is probably why those two are so relaxed in boasting about their google searches.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Nov, 2014 04:03 am
@revelette2,
Just bear it in mind during your exchanges with them.
BillRM
 
  2  
Reply Tue 18 Nov, 2014 06:33 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
think BillRM and Hawkeye are victims of their own bullshit. People don't come across such material everyday, even when searching for mainstream pornography.


Oh so Hawkeye and I have control of how others label their porn?

Quote:
depicting a graphic rape didn't clearly state the victim was over 18, should be treated with utter contempt.


Sorry but the law define child porn to include anyone who is one day short of her or his 18 birthday and as I had posted here people had been charge by the US government with this crime with claims that an actor or actress in a video could not be 18 years old by expert testimony.

Testimony that in some cases that had been wrong with the charges drop at the stage of a trial in one case when the actress had shown up with her passport to prove that she had been 19 years old at the time of the filming.

Quote:
probably why those two are so relaxed in boasting about their google searches.


Once more my stupid friend the google search engine does not point to child porn and doing a search for the key words [child porn] will never product links to child porn but cases dealing with child porn instead.

Therefore there is nothing either illegal or immoral in doing such searches.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 Nov, 2014 06:52 am
@BillRM,
https://38.media.tumblr.com/0608e09582648bce9c6632ed9169ae51/tumblr_n2zvz0C6H91tww5i2o1_500.png
0 Replies
 
revelette2
 
  2  
Reply Tue 18 Nov, 2014 07:20 am
@izzythepush,
I haven't come up with child porn on my searches either. I would think you would have to put certain specific words to get those results. I could see it if you're researching the subject for a specific reason, but just accidently coming across it, I don't think it is as likely as those two make out.

 

Related Topics

HOW COME . . . - Question by Setanta
Men who defend feminism? - Question by whatthefudge
Teach Men Not To Rape? - Question by nononono
Does every woman have her price...? - Question by nononono
Men Are Bad, Baaaaaaaaaaad. - Question by nononono
Misogyny - Discussion by chai2
Elliot Rodger - Question by FOUND SOUL
Best Looking Team at the Olympics? - Discussion by hawkeye10
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 09:38:21