25
   

1 in 5 women get raped?

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 07:37 am
@carloslebaron,
carloslebaron wrote:
"Women raped by their husbands" Lol what a ridiculous complaint.
Fortunately, it's prosecuted in that part of the world which generally is called "civilised" and "Christian".
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 07:57 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I guess this thread by it's very design gets it's weird people?
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 08:09 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
called "civilised" and "Christian".


Rarely in fact does the concept of both civilized and christian go together in reality.

See any history book or current event magazine for more backing for the above statement.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 08:10 am
@revelette2,
Quote:
I guess this thread by it's very design gets it's weird people?


LOL
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 08:50 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Fortunately, it's prosecuted in that part of the world which generally is called "civilised" and "Christian".


Footnote when the first case in the US was prosecuted for marital rape with great fan fair and after the state spend one hell of a lot of resources trying to get the man sentence to decades in prison as a rapist the man was found not guilty and shortly afterward he and his wife reconciliation.

Having the state in the bedrooms of married couples seems to have some slight draw backs no matter how PC it might be.

Of course now days the court would likely issue a permission order that they can not be together so that embarrassment to the state of a couple reconciliation can at least be stop.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 09:27 am
@revelette2,
revelette2 wrote:

I agree completely, I guess there are extremist on all sides.


Now we've got Mr and Mrs BillRM. (Wouldn't it be great if that was true?)
revelette2
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 10:28 am
@izzythepush,
I don't know, they would probably kill each other. I'm addicted to ID (an American reality show with real crimes..) anyway, there is one such show called "Fatal Vows." Usually dominate males end up with passive wives and usually women such as whatshername end up alone hating males. Me, I married my childhood sweetheart, so I don't know where that puts me. Just plain old ordinary I guess.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 10:29 am
@izzythepush,
You do not handle anyone who disagree with you very well.

With special note when I was able to prove you wrong such as your claims that no Americans lives was lost in fighting the Nazis and aiding England before the Pearl Harbor attack.
Lustig Andrei
 
  0  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 10:30 am
@soundsighted,
Good morning.

soundsighted wrote:

Society tells men that it's oK to think sexually about women, and that is a condonation of rape.


That is precisely the kind of thinking I was talking about when I said that your posts are a crock of ****. Of course men think sexually about women. And normal women frequently think sexually about men. That is the normal human condition. Unless you have an agenda against the procreation of the human race, that is how it should be, It has absolutely nothing to do with rape or even a fantasy of rape. It is normal human behavior for both men and women.

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
2. The biggest place where people are objectified is professional sports where athletes (mainly men) are turned into assets. Often they pay dearly with brain injuries, essentially selling their mental health for the cause of selling beer.



That is false. Those men are getting paid lots of money. The women in movies and ads are being exploited. And the porn industry is the worst. Those women are being used for sex by men who control them.


Are you suggesting that the women in movies and ads are not getting paid lots of money? These are professional actresses who welcome the opportunity to ply their trade. They are no more "exploited" than the pro athletes who play a game they may or may not enjoy playing. Again, there is zero connection to rape here.

Quote:
Not much is being done though. Sometimes when a woman says that's she's been raped after a night of drinking, the man is not prosecuted. Then he walks away scott free.


OK. First true and acceptable thing you've posted. I agree that that's too often true. Blaming the victim is wrong.

Quote:
Freedom of speech ends when women feel uncomfortable. When you allow men to say "Hey baby, you are pretty", or "You look fine girl." to a woman, that's a compliment she did not ask for, and therefore did not authorize. It's an invasion of personal human space. It's like if a man pulled his penis out in public.


What in the world makes you think that a sincere compliment would make the average normal woman feel uncomfortable? In my experience most women welcome that kind of attention. Do you actually know any normal women? In the unlikely event that you do, check with them. Or put the question out here on A2k. How many of the female posters here agree with you and disagree with what I've just said. Again, this has absolutely nothing to do with rape and may not even involve any salacious thoughts on the part of the man, merely an aesthetic appreciation.

Quote:
Not that many really. There are more for men. It's inequal.


(That quote is in re:support groups for women.) I hope you can provide a link to some statistics backing that claim. From my own admittedly non-scientific observation, there are far more support groups for women than men.

Quote:

Masculinity is a tool for violence. That's why shootings happen. Women don't commit violence hardly much at all.


Are you serious? That is one of the most hilarious statements I have ever heard. I have been threatened with knives by women, women in whom I had no sexual interest whatever. There was a story in the news not long ago about the woman who had emasculated her boy-friend with a knife, not because he had tried to rape her but because he was suspected of having been unfaithful to her.

Pathetic.

You live in a bizarre fantasy world, soundsighted.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 10:32 am
@revelette2,
Quote:
Usually dominate males end up with passive wives


How true as my wife is very very submission to my will<not>.
0 Replies
 
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 10:34 am
@revelette2,
Quote:
I'm addicted to ID (an American reality show with real crimes..) anyway,


I called it the murder channel myself and they show plenty of wives killing their husbands.

I can only watch this channel for an hour or two at any one time as the showing of the darkside of humans of both sexes get to me after that time. period.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 11:39 am
@BillRM,
BillRM wrote:

You do not handle anyone who disagree with you very well.

With special note when I was able to prove you wrong such as your claims that no Americans lives was lost in fighting the Nazis and aiding England before the Pearl Harbor attack.


You still banging on about that? It was a drop in the Ocean compared to British and Commonwealth casualties, even more so when you factor out normal maritime fatalities during peacetime.
Lustig Andrei
 
  2  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 12:00 pm
@izzythepush,
Why do you keep talking to this person, izzy? You're just feeding the troll. Ignore him.
BillRM
 
  0  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 12:09 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
You still banging on about that? It was a drop in the Ocean compared to British and Commonwealth casualties, even more so when you factor out normal maritime fatalities during peacetime.


LOL as a neutral nation we was bending all the rules to aid your nation to a great extent and losing lives at the same time whether it was a drop in the ocean or not compare to nations that was at war is kind of beside the point.

Nor was there any American voluntaries that I am aware of fighting on the German side as there was American voluntaries fighting on the UK side before Pearl Harbor.

An true to your very unpleasant personality you have taken the stand that no gratitude is owing to the American people for helping at the cost of American
blood.

As after all you have given us IOUs for all that military hardware we was shipping to you. IOUs that would have been completely worthless if Germany had won the battle of Britain.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 12:11 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
Quote:
Why do you keep talking to this person, izzy? You're just feeding the troll. Ignore him.


Dear friend did you not state that you had block me?????? Is the ignore function no longer working for you?
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 12:43 pm
@BillRM,
Stop0 trying to divert the topic. It's a bit said that you have to go all the way back to when I first joined A2K to find the one instance, where in your mind at least, you think you won an argument.

Btw, volunteers should also be taken out of the figure, they're individuals, and their country cannot claim credit for them in the same way it shouldn't be blamed for people joining IS.

Now stick to the topic.

And before you have a go at Merry, I remember you saying you had me on ignore.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 01:57 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
Now stick to the topic.

And before you have a go at Merry, I remember you saying you had me on ignore.


Your unpleasant to me date back to that disagreement and have not let up since then so it does related to all your postings that are directed an loveable me.

Yes, I did have you on ignore for a year or so but by taking antiacides I found that while I can not put up with Firefly I can put up with your nonsense.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 03:01 pm
@Lustig Andrei,
You responded to soundsighted by saying:
Quote:
What in the world makes you think that a sincere compliment would make the average normal woman feel uncomfortable? In my experience most women welcome that kind of attention. Do you actually know any normal women? In the unlikely event that you do, check with them. Or put the question out here on A2k. How many of the female posters here agree with you and disagree with what I've just said. Again, this has absolutely nothing to do with rape and may not even involve any salacious thoughts on the part of the man, merely an aesthetic appreciation.

I don't know many women who view catcalls or comments on the street about their appearance or bodies as "sincere compliments" or "merely an aesthetic appreciation". Those things do make most women feel uncomfortable most of the time--based on my own experience, as well as the reactions of all the other women I've known. Yes, if you feel you do look good, and you've taken pains to look attractive, a single wolfwhistle might not bother you, and you might regard that as flattery, but most of the time, unsolicited remarks or reactions from total strangers on the street make women feel acutely self conscious and somewhat anxious about the fact their bodies are being viewed and commented on in that objectified way, and it does make them feel more vulnerable.

I'm not sure that many men can really understand this because they've never experienced it or been subjected to that sort of thing. It is a form of sexual harassment, and it is sexist. And, just as they should do with rape and sexual assault, men have to start listening to women's feelings on these issues if they really want to understand them, and their impact.

Women receive inappropriate comments, of all sorts, on their bodies all the time, and not just on the street. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of NY recently wrote in her new book about the sorts of unwelcome comments made to her about her weight by male colleagues in Congress and the Senate.
Quote:
Kirsten Gillibrand: Peers called me ‘porky’
By LUCY MCCALMONT
8/27/14

New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand reveals in her new book that a number of her male colleagues on Capitol Hill made remarks about her weight, the New York Post and People magazine reported Wednesday.

“Good thing you’re working out, because you wouldn’t want to get porky!” Gillibrand writes in her new book, “Off the Sidelines,” the paper reported, citing an interview published with the senator in People magazine, which also had excerpts of her book.

"You know, Kirsten, you’re even pretty when you’re fat,” said another congressman, according to the Post.

Of that interaction, the paper reports Gillibrand wrote, “His intentions were sweet, even if he was being an idiot.”

The New York Democrat, who was featured in Vogue in 2010 and spoke about losing baby weight after the birth of her second child in 2008, said, according to the Post, a labor leader told her, “You need to be beautiful again” to win her special election in 2010.

However, the remarks continued after Gillibrand lost weight, the paper said.

“Don’t lose too much weight now. I like my girls chubby,” one lawmaker told Gillibrand, squeezing her waist.

Talking to People, however, Gillibrand said the men didn’t know better.

“It was all statements that were being made by men who were well into their 60s, 70s or 80s,” she said, in an excerpt published Wednesday of her People interview. “They had no clue that those are inappropriate things to say to a pregnant woman or a woman who just had a baby or to women in general.”

Back in 2010, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid raised some eyebrows during a fundraiser in New York when he said Gillibrand has been referred to by some in the Senate as “the hottest member.”

Gillibrand told POLITICO at a Women Rule event in March that the electorate has not moved beyond gender and addressed the lack of women in elected office.

“It is an old boys’ club without a doubt, we only have 20 women,” Gillibrand said. “But it is what it is, I wouldn’t say it’s sexist, I would say it is reality. It is a very male-dominated industry.”...
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/08/kirsten-gillibrand-book-110393.html#ixzz3HqQTEh7K


Gillibrand is actually being quite charitable and kind in terms of how she views sexist behaviors from colleagues on Capital Hill. Some other women have been more blunt.
Quote:
Just listen to the women who have covered Congress for years. Dana Bash, CNN's chief congressional correspondent, said Thursday she has heard "comments that would maybe just blow you away from male senators." NBC's Andrea Mitchell agreed, recalling "stories of whom you'd not get in an elevator with and whom you'd protect your young female interns from."

Speaking of Senate elevators, there's also this disturbing 1992 anecdote about Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), relayed by the Washington Post's Karen Tumulty.

As recounted in journalist Clara Bingham’s 1997 book “Women on the Hill,” Murray found herself alone in an elevator one evening with 91-year-old Sen. Strom Thurmond (R-S.C.), who did not recognize her as a colleague. He inquired whether the “little lady” was married -- and then proceeded to grope her breast, Bingham wrote.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/03/ron-johnson-gillibrand_n_5759790.html

If that's the sort of body commentary and behavior exhibited by our most venerable law makers, toward their female colleagues, and those females working around them, can you imagine what women in other walks of life, and college women, are forced to put up with all the time? Is it any wonder that it has taken so long to get this old boys network on Capital Hill so long to address issues of sexual assault and sexual harrassment in the military and on campuses at all? And that that fight is still spearheaded by female members of the Senate--like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, and Senator Claire McCaskill--who understand the importance of this issue from a woman's perspective, because it's mainly women who get sexually assaulted.

Neither sexual harassment, nor sexism, nor sexual assault, should ever be regarded as acceptable, let alone "normal" behaviors on the part of men or women.

That's why I see the White House campus initiative, It's On Us, as a good step in the right direction--it addresses all of those issues and gives everyone the opportunity to be actively involved in controlling the campus sexual climate around them, and to become part of altering both attitudes and behavior on their campus. Maybe the next generation of female Senators won't have to put up with inappropriate comments about their bodies from their male colleagues, whether it's about being "porky" or being "hot".

And, if you take a look at some of the other topics soundsighted has posted, and his comments on them, I think you'll find him both inconsistent and not altogether sincere in what he says. For instance, he criticized Hawkeye for using the word "****" in this thread, but he used the word himself in another thread. So, I'm not sure the opinions he's expressed here should deserve serious consideration or response. I think he often tries to be simply provocative and somewhat satirical in what he posts.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 03:27 pm
@BillRM,
You really do twist things. We may have disagreed back then, but it wasn't any more than that. I've had similar disagreements with other posters. My unpleasantness towards you has absolutely nothing to do with WW2 and everything to do with your disgraceful attitude towards women, children, homosexuals, black people and racist murderers.

I'm not the one with a problem, you are. That's why so many people on this thread have expressed their disgust, (yes, DISGUST,) towards you.
BillRM
 
  1  
Reply Sat 1 Nov, 2014 04:04 pm
@izzythepush,
Quote:
to do with your disgraceful attitude towards women, children, homosexuals, black people and racist murderers.


Let see homosexuals you mean that I would not have sex with a man even a man who have gone under the knife and look like a good looking woman and would be outrageous if someone trick me into unknowing having sex with such a person? Shame on me.

Black peoples you mean that they should not be over half of the US prison population when they are ten percents of the population? That such things as long terms sentences for non-violence drug crimes or three strike laws should be done away with in order to reduce the black population in prisons. Shame on me.

Racist murderer you mean a Latin man with black blood in his own vein who used legal deadly force to save his own life when attacked by a black teenager as found by a jury? Shame on me.

Women you mean that they should have the same rights and responsibilities as men? Shame on me.

Children can not even guess at that one. unless you mean my thinking that your own nation have the right level of punishment for the crime of having child porn and for agreeing with the majority of Federal judges on this issue?

Shame on me.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HOW COME . . . - Question by Setanta
Men who defend feminism? - Question by whatthefudge
Teach Men Not To Rape? - Question by nononono
Does every woman have her price...? - Question by nononono
Men Are Bad, Baaaaaaaaaaad. - Question by nononono
Misogyny - Discussion by chai2
Elliot Rodger - Question by FOUND SOUL
Best Looking Team at the Olympics? - Discussion by hawkeye10
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/01/2024 at 01:01:15