The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie

... I do not believe the prosecutor was trying very hard to get an indictment, in fact, I believe he was trying to get the opposite.

You can believe that if you want but I believe it was released was to bolster their position,


I do not believe the prosecutor was trying very hard to get an indictment, in fact, I believe he was trying to get the opposite.

Frank Apisa wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:

I 've seen parts of Wilson's inteview, so far; he did a good job.

I 'd question those who oppose him
to ascertain what THAY 'd have done in his place.

One thing he could have done was to just let the young man get away. Brown's companion apparently was not fleeing...and could easily have been apprehended...and determining Brown's identity for later apprehension could easily have been accomplished.

But I guess shooting the young man to death seems like a much better alternative to gun enthusiasts. They can enjoy the thrill of the kill vicariously.

For ease (although I don't like to do this as it is messy) I quoted your entire thing so you can see I did not copy and paste.

Sorry you didn't say he was trying to get away - you inferred he was fleeing by stating his compainion was not --- thus suggesting Brown was fleeing while his companion was not.

No you did not say the police office should have let him get away -- you said he could - how could he then? How can you let someone get away if he is attacking you? Again you infer or suggest that the police officer should have let him get away if you say he could have let him get away.

Now that I used your exact words does it make your arguement any better?

This is the opinion of most Afro-Americans.

... if the KID had been fleeing instead of attacking the officer how the state could had prosecute.

According to most reports either on TV or in Print media, Mr. Brown ( the attacker) at some point-in-time did run away from Mr. Wilson, the Police officer ( who was attacked by Mr. Brown).

What felony are you talking about? You don't kill a kid for stealing some cigarettes.

Wilson COULD HAVE ALLOWED Brown to get away.

You're more ignorant than most; how did you arrive at the idea that he was trying to kill a cop? Your bigoted imagination is working on overdrive.

It seems you've never been involved in a fist fight. Have you ever played football? How about boxing?

Quote:

Wilson COULD HAVE ALLOWED Brown to get away.

You still did not explain how he could have allowed him to get away.

You just keep saying he could have?

Brown, from testimony, was not trying to get away so how would he? If someone is coming at you - how do you let them get away? They are not trying to get away?

Please explain how you allow someone to get away that is NOT trying to get away?

Now I can understand if you it is stated that Brown was trying to get away, but that is not what is stated. Now if you say the testimony is lying and Brown was trying to get away then that is different. Then the testimony is a lie -- evidence does not collaborate that Brown was trying to get away - ie not shots in the back.

Now if you think the evidence is incorrect and the testimony are lies -- then you should be saying so - not that the officer could have let him get away.

Logically you cannot allow someone to get away if they are not getting away.

If the cop had just let him go, then arrest him later with more assistance, all that happened could have been prevented. There was no real cause for anyone to be chased by a cop.