40
   

The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie

 
 
revelette2
 
  4  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 08:54 am
@oralloy,
Quote:
No. I'm pretty good at tuning out left-wing hysteria.


Just as I thought, you spoke in ignorance.
farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 08:58 am
@oralloy,
sheriffs arent really law enforcement officers in the main. They are usually "process servers" nd "Vacate notice affixers" , They also act as Marshals and deliver prisoners to and from jail and courts. This is Pa's structure in which we are unique for the 5 surrounding states(except NY). In Delaware, they have COUNTY police and Sheriffs that all act as Law Enforcement (Del also has a State Police Corps).

It seems that the Staties in the Mid Atlantic are all hired and trained like soldiers and not "political appointees" like many of our local cops.



oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 09:22 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
sheriffs arent really law enforcement officers in the main. They are usually "process servers" nd "Vacate notice affixers" , They also act as Marshals and deliver prisoners to and from jail and courts. This is Pa's structure in which we are unique for the 5 surrounding states(except NY). In Delaware, they have COUNTY police and Sheriffs that all act as Law Enforcement (Del also has a State Police Corps).
It seems that the Staties in the Mid Atlantic are all hired and trained like soldiers and not "political appointees" like many of our local cops.

In Michigan we have state police and county sheriffs. Local governments have the right to "rent" a given degree of police presence from their county sheriff department, as well as the right to hire their own police force (if they pay for it themselves). All of them have general law enforcement power.

I have no contact with the police (either positive or negative), so I can't give any opinion regarding their professionalism.

I was going to suggest that if you guys had a similar system, a non-professional local police department might be replaced by having police funds go to renting a police presence from the county sheriff. But it sounds like you guys have a different system.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 09:23 am
@revelette2,
revelette2 wrote:
Just as I thought, you spoke in ignorance.

No, I have actual experience in tuning out left-wing hysteria. I can testify that it actually works.

Anyway, take your name-calling and go away. I'm having an interesting conversation with Farmerman.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  5  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 09:36 am
@Baldimo,
The funny thing about being pulled over by the police is "white privilege" means they will treat you differently.


Interesting how "white privilege" even applies to emergency rooms.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12253244
0 Replies
 
tony5732
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 09:40 am
@izzythepush,
You know about feathers and England. I'm sure everyone in the world knows SOMETHING. Being liberal does not make you an expert on the subject.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 09:50 am
@izzythepush,
Nice info... To bad it has nothing to do with how the US school systems work or how it's funded. It also doesn't have much to do with the founding of the US school system, which would have started in the original 13 colonies.

History of the US school system:
Quote:
All the New England colonies required towns to set up schools, and many did so. In 1642 the Massachusetts Bay Colony made "proper" education compulsory; other New England colonies followed. Similar statutes were adopted in other colonies in the 1640s and 1650s. The schools were all male, with few facilities for girls.[5] In the 18th century, "common schools," appeared; students of all ages were under the control of one teacher in one room. Although they were publicly supplied at the local (town) level, they were not free, and instead were supported by tuition or "rate bills."

izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 10:10 am
@tony5732,
I'm not a ******* Liberal, piss off with that.

izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 10:14 am
@Baldimo,
And America popped out of nowhere didn't it?

I note you've missed off the link, not surprising.

However, from your quotation.

Quote:
Although they were publicly supplied at the local (town) level, they were not free


So the poor either relied on charity or didn't go.


This isn't a political thing, it's bloody obvious.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 10:24 am
New York Police Sergeant Commits Suicide After Sex-Crime Charges
Source: New York Times

A New York police sergeant who was arrested this month on charges that he had sex with an underage girl he met online committed suicide on Thursday, the police said.

The sergeant, Joel Doseau, 43, who was suspended after his arrest, killed himself at his home in Canarsie, Brooklyn, a police official said. Earlier, the official had said he died at a home of a relative.

A family member went to the sergeant’s home after he had not been heard from for a few days and discovered his body. The official said the sergeant had inhaled gas fumes and appeared to have died from asphyxiation.

Sergeant Doseau was arrested on Aug. 5 and arraigned in State Supreme Court in Brooklyn on 40 criminal counts, including rape and sexual abuse. He had worked for the Police Department for 12 years at the time of his arrest.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/21/nyregion/new-york-police-sergeant-commits-suicide-after-sex-crime-charges.html
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 10:32 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
And America popped out of nowhere didn't it?


It was people like me fleeing from people like you.

Quote:
I note you've missed off the link, not surprising.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_education_in_the_United_States
Funny that you demand a link as you are one of the people who "state" the most facts with the least amount of supporting information. The only person who is worse is Rex with his pointless meme's.

Quote:
However, from your quotation.

Quote:
Quote:
Although they were publicly supplied at the local (town) level, they were not free


So the poor either relied on charity or didn't go.


This isn't a political thing, it's bloody obvious.


I love how you cut off the rest of that quote. Since you are so dishonest, I'll just provide the rest of it here.
Quote:
, and instead were supported by tuition or "rate bills."


Back in those days, the "poor" as you want to call them were working with their parents to manage their land. If you want to compare the modern US to the 1600's US, then be my guest. See, you really do seem to know nothing about the US. As I've said before, the first people over here on boats, were fleeing people like you. We fought a war to free ourselves from people exactly like you.

farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 10:37 am
@oralloy,
we have a state civil service that has got a nut hold on several areas including police, county nd local building services as well all liquor sales in the state. Its Byzantine and highly inefficient but its what we got.
All police are required to take an Academy training (some , like the state police) like to have the troopers to acquire an LE degree or ME degree.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 10:47 am
@Baldimo,
You know nothing about your pilgrim fathers, they weren't fleeing people like me. They were religious bigots fleeing tolerance. They didn't like the fact we weren't burning Catholics any more.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 10:59 am
@izzythepush,
Tolerance? It seems there was a lack of tolerance by the crown for people who didn't follow their religion. As usual, I'm sure you are confusing the real definition of tolerance with your made up version of the word. Tolerance is a one way street with you people, you expect everyone to tolerate what you believe in, but you refuse to tolerate what others believe in. Tolerance is not a real thing in your world, it's a ******* sham.
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 11:43 am
@Baldimo,
They weren't 'fleeing' dummy, they were 'transported' and in chains.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 11:45 am
@Baldimo,
Where do you dig up that clap trap? There was religious tolerance in England for centuries before the 1776 regardless of the King being he 'head' of the Church of England.

Trying reading some history before blathering on incorrectly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_Kingdom

Here's a tidbit for you:
Roman Catholicism remained the dominant form of Western Christianity, including in Britain, throughout the Middle Ages, but the (Anglican) Church of England became the independent established church in England and Wales from 1534 as a result of the English Reformation.[7] It retains a representation in the UK Parliament and the British monarch is its Supreme Governor.[8]

In Scotland, the Presbyterian Church of Scotland, established in a separate Scottish Reformation in the sixteenth century, is recognised as the national church. It is not subject to state control and the British monarch is an ordinary member, required to swear an oath to "maintain and preserve the Protestant Religion and Presbyterian Church Government" upon his or her accession.[9][10]

The adherence to Roman Catholicism continued at various levels in different parts of Britain, especially among recusants and in the north of England,[11] but most strongly in Ireland. This would expand in Great Britain, partly due to Irish immigration in the nineteenth century [12], the Catholic emancipation and the Restoration of the English hierarchy.

Particularly from the mid-seventeenth century, forms of Protestant nonconformity, including Congregationalists, Baptists, Quakers and, later, Methodists, grew outside of the established church.[13] The (Anglican) Church in Wales was disestablished in 1920 and, as the (Anglican) Church of Ireland was disestablished in 1870 before the partition of Ireland, there is no established church in Northern Ireland.[14]

The Jews in England were expulsed in 1290 and only emancipated in the 19th century. British Jews had numbered fewer than 10,000 in 1800 but around 120,000 after 1881 when Russian Jews settled permanently in Britain.[15]


And we won't mention how you make false claims of English religious persecution when persicution of Muslims in the US seems o offend you to no end.

Care to explain?
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 11:50 am
@bobsal u1553115,
It was the reason they left England.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 01:22 pm
@Baldimo,
No the reason they left England was because they wanted far harsher, stricter, religious laws. They were the ISIS of their day.

Quote:
the Puritan fathers of the Massachusetts Bay Colony did not countenance tolerance of opposing religious views. Their “city upon a hill” was a theocracy that brooked no dissent, religious or political.
The most famous dissidents within the Puritan community, Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson, were banished following disagreements over theology and policy. From Puritan Boston’s earliest days, Catholics (“Papists”) were anathema and were banned from the colonies, along with other non-Puritans. Four Quakers were hanged in Boston between 1659 and 1661 for persistently returning to the city to stand up for their beliefs.

Throughout the colonial era, Anglo-American antipathy toward Catholics—especially French and Spanish Catholics—was pronounced and often reflected in the sermons of such famous clerics as Cotton Mather and in statutes that discriminated against Catholics in matters of property and voting. Anti-Catholic feelings even contributed to the revolutionary mood in America after King George III extended an olive branch to French Catholics in Canada with the Quebec Act of 1774, which recognized their religion.


http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/americas-true-history-of-religious-tolerance-61312684/?no-ist=&page=2
izzythepush
 
  2  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 01:23 pm
@Baldimo,
You can't help playing the victim can you? My nasty old ancestors persecuted yours, diddums.

Try growing a pair, you're as bad as Hawkeye.
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Fri 21 Aug, 2015 01:31 pm
@izzythepush,
As usual, your post does not relate to the subject as you claim. Even the name of the article says this is about the America's and has nothing to do with why they left England.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/25/2024 at 04:47:31