@revelette2,
DAVID wrote:I question your assumption resulting in your conclusion
that: "That means he acted badly or was poorly trained."
revelette2 wrote:He must have been poorly trained, or in the heat of the moment,
threw it out the window to shoot someone six times. Either a bad shot,
or an awful lot of rage.
Rage
in the target.
The reason for shooting was to end the threat.
Y do u think that there was anything rong with his training ??
revelette2 wrote:I don't see why he had to resort to shooting an unarmed man in the first place,
He was
NOT "an unarmed man".
He was armed
naturally, the same way that a rattlesnake is armed.
He ruffed up both the victim of the cigar robbery
and Wilson. I m glad that we r rid of that danger.
revelette2 wrote:but if he did, I don't see why he had to shoot him six times.
I do not see how that would be defensive.
From what is being discussed, he was
charging Wilson, who broke the charge
with a lucky head shot.
Most likely, he was only using a 9mm automatic.
Thay don t have much stopping power. I favor .44 special,
with hollowpointed slugs, for maximal energy dump within the target.
David