17
   

For the dems, who is there besides Hillary?

 
 
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 02:52 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Blacks failure to produce is always the fault of Racism, this we know. Just look at the Haitians, who go back hundreds of years to find racism grievances to justify their current poor quality of work.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 03:08 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Oh no, not the racism canard.
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 03:10 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Blacks failure to produce is always the fault of Racism, this we know. Just look at the Haitians, who go back hundreds of years to find racism grievances to justify their current poor quality of work.


You guys were skewering Obama while he was still running for office...so none of the things you mentioned in the post I sited could have been known.

That was just cover up for something.

Now...one of the things that you people skewering him did know...

...was that he did not have white skin.

You cannot get away from that, Hawk.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 03:10 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

It redounds to O's credit that he served as a community organizer.


Obviously some of us don't hold the position in such high regard.
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 03:11 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Oh no, not the racism canard.


Nope.

Just highlighting something that should be obvious.

Read what I wrote...and you will see.
RABEL222
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 03:17 pm
@Lash,
You mean like starting 2 wars on weapons of mass destruction lies. We need another republican president, were about to wind down those wars Bush started. If we allow that, the weapons industry might lose money.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 03:45 pm
@Frank Apisa,
I didn’t intend on going into any great detail on this but you me to again read what you wrote and reconsider my comment.

Here's what Hawkeye wrote:

Quote:
No, what is at play is " OK, we have seen the system chew up and spit out the high minded community organizer, so it must take a thug to get anything done". Thing is Obama is not a failure because he is too high minded and nice, he is a failure because he is a dick with poor judgment. we took away the wrong lesson.


Here's what your wrote:

Quote:
Right...and you guys all knew that before he was even elected!

Oh...you did forget to mention one thing you did know. His skin is not as white as the usual Republican voter's skin is.


I don't know how I could come to any conclusion other than you are questioning that those who are now opposed to Obama ("you guys") couldn't have done so before he was elected; based on a belief that he was a "dick with poor judgment", because no one could have known he was "a dick with poor judgment." before he was elected.

Putting aside the question of what a "dick" is and how it can be determined if anyone is or was a "dick," I seem to recall that Obama had some years of public service (albeit very few) in which his judgment about issues facing his state of Illinois and the nation were on public display or available through modest efforts at research. He also made quite a few promises and pronouncements about what he would do if elected while he was campaigning for the office. Presumably these were based on his judgments.

The second sentence of your comment reminds Hawkeye that there was one thing Obama's opponents could have known about him prior to his election, and that is that he was black.

This clearly implies that opposition to Obama before he was elected, was based on the color of his skin, not his judgment. I don't know how you can argue that it does not.

I suppose you could argue that you were not implying that all opposition was based on skin color, but then we would have to know what you meant by "you guys." Being aware of how you tend to broadly generalize in your disdain for Republicans and conservatives, I don't think it is much of a stretch to conclude you were employing the racism canard and charging that at least much of the pre-election opposition to Obama was due to his skin color and not his judgment.

If this is what you believe that's fine, but you shouldn't try and deny it, and if it isn't what you believe then you should take more care with what you write, because it is what you said.

There's a more interesting side note to your comment though. If no one could know that Obama had poor judgment before he was elected, that would have to mean that there was only evidence of good judgment or no evidence of the quality of his judgment. I reject either possibility but if the second of them are true, we elected a man without any idea of the quality of his judgment. If you like the guy, I guess you can say we were lucky, but even then you would have to admit that he was elected the basis of some perceived promise of good judgment. What could possibly be the source of that perception?


Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 03:53 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

I didn’t intend on going into any great detail on this but you me to again read what you wrote and reconsider my comment.

Here's what Hawkeye wrote:

Quote:
No, what is at play is " OK, we have seen the system chew up and spit out the high minded community organizer, so it must take a thug to get anything done". Thing is Obama is not a failure because he is too high minded and nice, he is a failure because he is a dick with poor judgment. we took away the wrong lesson.


Here's what your wrote:

Quote:
Right...and you guys all knew that before he was even elected!

Oh...you did forget to mention one thing you did know. His skin is not as white as the usual Republican voter's skin is.


I don't know how I could come to any conclusion other than you are questioning that those who are now opposed to Obama ("you guys") couldn't have done so before he was elected; based on a belief that he was a "dick with poor judgment", because no one could have known he was "a dick with poor judgment." before he was elected.

Putting aside the question of what a "dick" is and how it can be determined if anyone is or was a "dick," I seem to recall that Obama had some years of public service (albeit very few) in which his judgment about issues facing his state of Illinois and the nation were on public display or available through modest efforts at research. He also made quite a few promises and pronouncements about what he would do if elected while he was campaigning for the office. Presumably these were based on his judgments.

The second sentence of your comment reminds Hawkeye that there was one thing Obama's opponents could have known about him prior to his election, and that is that he was black.

This clearly implies that opposition to Obama before he was elected, was based on the color of his skin, not his judgment. I don't know how you can argue that it does not.

I suppose you could argue that you were not implying that all opposition was based on skin color, but then we would have to know what you meant by "you guys." Being aware of how you tend to broadly generalize in your disdain for Republicans and conservatives, I don't think it is much of a stretch to conclude you were employing the racism canard and charging that at least much of the pre-election opposition to Obama was due to his skin color and not his judgment.

If this is what you believe that's fine, but you shouldn't try and deny it, and if it isn't what you believe then you should take more care with what you write, because it is what you said.

There's a more interesting side note to your comment though. If no one could know that Obama had poor judgment before he was elected, that would have to mean that there was only evidence of good judgment or no evidence of the quality of his judgment. I reject either possibility but if the second of them are true, we elected a man without any idea of the quality of his judgment. If you like the guy, I guess you can say we were lucky, but even then you would have to admit that he was elected the basis of some perceived promise of good judgment. What could possibly be the source of that perception?





One: Okay...I will not deny it, Finn.

Two: I am careful about what I write.

Three: The intense hatred for Obama causes me to question the motives of everything "you guys"say...just as I am sure many questioned the motives of everything I wrote about Dubya, because of my intense dislike of him.

Four: The skin color is not everything...and the skin color does play a part.

Five: If I left out anything...lay it on me again. I'll try to cover everything that concerns you.
glitterbag
 
  2  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 09:42 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Advocate wrote:

It redounds to O's credit that he served as a community organizer.


Obviously some of us don't hold the position in such high regard.


Of course not, Jesus Christ was a community organizer, however, Pontius Pilate was a governor.
Finn dAbuzz
 
  0  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 09:51 pm
@Frank Apisa,
That was refreshing.

You're still using the racism canard, but at least you're not trying to deny it. And I assume that your comment about being careful about what you write means you stand by it. So the next question is who are "you guys."

I'm sure that there are people who think Obama is a dick with poor judgment, who also don't like the fact that a black man is the president. I am certain, though, that they are in the minority of those who oppose him, but apparently you don't. Of course you have no proof of your insulting belief but don't let that stop you, it's such a cheap and easy tool to use in an argument it must be irresistible.

Cute too how you describe anti-Obama sentiment as "intense hatred," but your anti-Bush sentiment as "intense dislike."

Frankly, I don't recall your anti-Bush sentiment but if it was anything like your anti-Republican sentiment I would say it rose (or lowered) to hatred. I can tell you that I might have thought it was nutty, but I wouldn't have thought it proved you were a pedophile, a traitor, or anything else that could be comparable to being a racist. I honestly would not have questioned your motives. You hate Republican, why wouldn't you hate Bush?

Because some pedophiles, traitors, and other criminals might have hated Bush certainly didn't mean that you were one, and I can't see me suggesting you were without a lot more evidence than the fact that you seemed to hate him.

That some racists think Obama is a dick with poor judgment, doesn't mean he isn't one and that it's impossible to reach that conclusion without being a racist.

It's such a cheap way to argue. If you want to use it, that's up to you, but as far as I'm concerned it doesn't speak well of you. I don't expect you to feel chastened by this; I'm hardly the personification of propriety, but I think it is almost always bullshit, and I'm going to call bullshit when I see it.




coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 10:06 pm
Quote:
That some racists think Obama is a dick with poor judgment, doesn't mean he isn't one and that it's impossible to reach that conclusion without being a racist.

http://www.acidpulse.net/images/smilies/cheer.gif
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jun, 2014 10:29 pm
@glitterbag,
You get that from Steve Cohen or him from you?

I'll bite, how was Jesus a community organizer?
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  2  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 03:36 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

That was refreshing.

You're still using the racism canard, but at least you're not trying to deny it. And I assume that your comment about being careful about what you write means you stand by it. So the next question is who are "you guys."

I'm sure that there are people who think Obama is a dick with poor judgment, who also don't like the fact that a black man is the president. I am certain, though, that they are in the minority of those who oppose him, but apparently you don't. Of course you have no proof of your insulting belief but don't let that stop you, it's such a cheap and easy tool to use in an argument it must be irresistible.

Cute too how you describe anti-Obama sentiment as "intense hatred," but your anti-Bush sentiment as "intense dislike."

Frankly, I don't recall your anti-Bush sentiment but if it was anything like your anti-Republican sentiment I would say it rose (or lowered) to hatred. I can tell you that I might have thought it was nutty, but I wouldn't have thought it proved you were a pedophile, a traitor, or anything else that could be comparable to being a racist. I honestly would not have questioned your motives. You hate Republican, why wouldn't you hate Bush?

Because some pedophiles, traitors, and other criminals might have hated Bush certainly didn't mean that you were one, and I can't see me suggesting you were without a lot more evidence than the fact that you seemed to hate him.

That some racists think Obama is a dick with poor judgment, doesn't mean he isn't one and that it's impossible to reach that conclusion without being a racist.

It's such a cheap way to argue. If you want to use it, that's up to you, but as far as I'm concerned it doesn't speak well of you. I don't expect you to feel chastened by this; I'm hardly the personification of propriety, but I think it is almost always bullshit, and I'm going to call bullshit when I see it.






Well I am glad you finally got around to doing so.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 07:57 am
Obama is not a real blackie, he's sort of half white, so I suppose anybody who criticises him could be called a half-racist..Smile
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 08:09 am
@Romeo Fabulini,
Quote:
Obama is not a real blackie, he's sort of half white,


It is nothing more than an excuse for Frank. There is really nothing else to defend Obamas terrible job other than to blame it on racists.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 08:11 am
http://proteinwisdom.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/hillary-clinton-fascist-650x.jpg
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 08:27 am
Speaking of being half-white, half-black like Obama, this Star Trek episode featured the same sort of bizarre phenomenon-

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/star-t-gorsh.gif~original
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 08:32 am
@Romeo Fabulini,
Quote:
Speaking of being half-white, half-black like Obama, this Star Trek episode featured the same sort of bizarre phenomenon-


White guilt.......the final frontier.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 08:36 am
@coldjoint,
Yeah I don't know why some mush-for-brains whites feel guilty!
The white race should be PROUD for rescuing blacks from the jungles and giving them free passage to great Christian America and setting them up in good steady jobs on the plantations with free housing, free food and medical care, and teaching them to speak english..Smile

The Brits too did their bit in rescuing them from around the world, one minute they were eating each other in the jungles, and the next they're taking tea and cream buns in the Little Puddington tearooms

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/tribal_zps77d92766.jpg~original
coldjoint
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 19 Jun, 2014 08:40 am
@Romeo Fabulini,
Quote:
Yeah I don't know why some mush-for-brains whites feel guilty!


You need to ask one. Then ask him where and when he purchased his slave.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.18 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 11:25:15