Yes, Walter Hinteler, I happen to have a Master's Degree in History. I realize that a US Master's Degree is no where near as good as a few sessions with a good German Nachhilfelehler. but it will have to do. You know, how backward these American Universities are, don't you?
has the judge entered his opine on German higher education or are we speculating with our dissing of Walter?
foxfyre- That is a great speech given by a great American, but the left won't pay any heed to it.
Reagan said in that speech.
quote
I BELIEVE THAT FAITH AND RELIGION PLAY A GREAT PART IN THE POLITICAL LIFE OF OUR NATION.
The left will pay no attention. Why?
Reagan did not graduate from an Ivy League college.
Reagan did not attend the trendy Georgetown wine and cheese parties.
Reagan did not enthuse over the incomprehnsible art loved by the left wing---Klee, Pollock, Serrano
Reagan was basically a Westerner. He was not from the effete East.
But his presidency of eight years affected our country greatly, for the better as far as the right is concerned and, negatively, in the eyes of the left.
It will be left to History to judge his legacy although it has already been made clear by professional historians that he is far far superior to Bill Clinton.
septembri wrote:The left will pay no attention.
Why?
Reagan did not graduate from an Ivy League college.
Reagan did not attend the trendy Georgetown wine and cheese parties.
Reagan did not enthuse over the incomprehnsible art loved by the left wing---Klee, Pollock, Serrano
Reagan was basically a Westerner. He was not from the effete East.
Is your point that Reagan was correct, or that "the left" (whoever that is), is a bunch of elitist snobs?
septembri wrote:It will be left to History to judge his legacy although it has already been made clear by professional historians that he is far far superior to Bill Clinton.
I don't know about that, but I would say that he's definitely far superior to George W. Bush.
Quote:Bill Allows Mixing of Religion, Politics
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: June 7, 2004
Filed at 8:05 p.m. ET
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Churches that mistakenly mix religious and political activity would face reduced fines but keep their tax exempt status under a provision in a corporate tax bill the House is to consider this week.
The proposal, which could invalidate the strict separation of religion and politics in current tax laws, was introduced by House Republicans the same week President Bush's re-election campaign targeted 1,600 Pennsylvania congregations to recruit voters.
You guys REALLY have to get rid of this administration.
Oh nonsense. The operative word here is 'mistakingly'. I once unintentionally booked a group into a conference center and later found out the group did not have the not-for-profit credentials necessary to do business with our not-for-profit (religious affiliated) entity. We didn't get caught, but if we had, under current law, our not-for-profit status would have been revoked.
Under the proposed law we would have opportunity to correct the matter and not suffer the ultimate penalty for an honest mistake.
actually I have no idea if George is a fundamentalist christian but I would be inclined to say not. So far he has not indicated any sufficient sustained reasoning that would be indicative of a coherent philosophical religious belief system. He has however, consistently postured a leaning towards the voting bloc that would be easily considered "christian right." He has, IMHO, demonstrated disregard for constitutional tradition re separation of church and state to such a degree that many moderate religious leaders as well as advocates of secular protections have voiced alarm. As president there is little to fear from George in this matter, however he has surrounded himself with others (Ashcroft-Cheney-Rumsfeld-etal) who do pose a serious threat to the social stability of our nation and our society.
kickycan wrote:septembri wrote:The left will pay no attention.
Why?
Reagan did not graduate from an Ivy League college.
Reagan did not attend the trendy Georgetown wine and cheese parties.
Reagan did not enthuse over the incomprehnsible art loved by the left wing---Klee, Pollock, Serrano
Reagan was basically a Westerner. He was not from the effete East.
Is your point that Reagan was correct,
or that "the left" (whoever that is), is a bunch of elitist snobs?
I couldn't help but notice that you said "or" here... :wink:
Paul Klee -- an artist member of the Bauhaus which the facist Hitler regime closed down. Fitting that there are still those who would include him in their meaningless tirade.
Well, Walter, in US universities they give out degrees in multiple personalities.
I'm sure he would take umbrage.
As the WSJ revealed yesterday, and as is covered in the NY Times and Wash Post and elsewhere today, John Aschcroft's Justice Department lawyers concluded that torture could be used by the US, that the President had complete power to order this strategy regardless of international conventions and standing US military law.
Lying is ok. Torture is ok. Integrity and compassion as far as the eye can see.
I am quite certain that none of the posters here are professional historians.
It has become quite chic for the left wing elitists to denigrate Ronald Reagan, just as the Liberals tried to blacken President Eisenhower's name.
They are dead wrong.
According to the C-SPAN survey of Presidential Leadership--
http://www.americanpresidents.org/survey/historians/overall.asp
Ronald Reagan is rated by the PROFESSIONAL HISTORIANS who contributed to the survey as Eleventh in overall ranking.
Bill Clinton, on the other hand, is rated Twenty-First
just behind, George H.W. Bush who is rated Twentieth.
President Reagan would not, I am sure, have rejected Klee for his opposition to the Jewish hating Nazis. I believe that he would have expressed bewilderment at viewing a picture like "Structural II"
Maybe light wizard can explain its meaning to us!
But if you want to read about charlathans in the world of "art" you should look at Tom Wolfe's "The Painted Word".
He reveals many of the modern artists to be phonies that are propped up by the elitists who stand before a Jackson Pollock painting and breathlessly declare that the meaningless mess is a "work of art".
Here is a quote from "19th and 20th Century Painters" by Hans L. C. Jaffe( capitalizations mine, for emphasis)
p. 201
"Jackson Pollock"
Eyes in the Heat II- 1947- Oil on Canvas
quote
"By letting his brush run over the canvas in free rhythmic movements, or by dribbling paint from brush or can onto a canvas laid flat on the floor, POLLOCK ALLOWED THE PAINTING TO PAINT ITSELF WITHOUT THE CALCULATING CONTROL OF A PRIOR CONCEPTION.
This extreme SPONTANEITY, which records the fluctuations of the artist's feelings UNHAMPERED BY THE CONSCIOUS WILL, is truly the ultimate form of an art of expression of Dionysiac origin."
Written, I am sure, by an elitist left wing phony.
Yes, George Bush is a fundamentalist chickenshit.......
What, oh, christian, hmmmmmm, never mind