Child Molesting Preacher Blames Affair on Clinton

The irony is, also, that, had the right not pursued him so relentlessly for his sexual behaviour, it would never have been plastered all over the media for, it appears to be being suggested, the education in matters oral and extra-marital, of a generation of high school students - and clergy - who would otherwise never have known about such things?

You did.

I doubt Clinton, thus unaided, would have so enthusiastically educated so many young, and divine, Americans in the uses of fellatio (and, one hopes, cunnilingus) and cigars.

Waht...you mean the woman is supposed to enjoy it too???

You did:

" he got away with it, kept his job, and the attitudes about it shifted appreciably in young people, who reported a phenomenal increase in thie particular activity--"

or maybe just in oral sex.....


well, less pregnancies that way.....lol...

Hobit - I have enough admiration for the Clinton intellect and basic good intentions - if not all of his sexual behaviour - to hope that he did not make oral sex a one way street.

If he did - well, dammit, perhaps the right is right about him as a president!

Waht was that song lyric by Whitesnake...
"Spit it out...
Spit it out...
Spit it out..
If you don't like it!"

We were a little confused.

We thought it was illegal. So many CEOs had been fired for the same thing--and so many women had claimed sexual harrassment, and won lawsuits for the same thing-- and the NOW had loudly and rightfully protested old wankers getting off by using young women, because of their superior positions in the officeplace...You know, the same thing.

But, we see now.

Anyhoo, no one here blamed Clinton for high school sex.

You did - repeatedly.

Nah, I didn't blame Clinton for high school sex.
Sloppy, both of you.

Ah - yer right - good sex is ALWAYS sloppy......

Sofia, read your own post and tell us you didn't blame Clinton for teenaged sex. Or are we not supposed to notice you lying?


http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=681663#681663

When I specified, I said middle-schoolers, pre-teens and teens... High school wasn't mentioned.

And the charge was a 'shift in attitudes about oral sex'-- Quite a difference.

And, if both the boys AND girls were receiving head, I would only be half as miffed. Like Clinton taught, the girls are used as objects of male gratification. No decent woman would laugh at, and applaud the demoralization of young girls, under the tutelary, beedy eye of a fat, disgusting politician... Unless, of course, if it is a Democrat.

<edited for spaces and commas>

Hobit
I'd expect you to be a bit more accurate in your reading comprehension, what with being a Professor, and all.

I certainly did not make the statement you attribute to me, nor did I lie.

Keep telling yourself that.

There is an important difference in high school and middle school; sex, and attitudes about oral sex.

Why do you feel the need to try to pretend differently?

Sofia, I dodn't start this thread in order to get into a fight wioth you, so I'm leaving my own thread. Congratulations on being a shrill, argumentative, bellicose person. I hope you accomplished what you set out to do. What started out as a mildly amusing thread about a mildly amusing comment has turend into a typical thread where a conservative insists they didn't say what they did indeed say. Have a nice evening.

Oh my! This is like the it is sex/it ain't sex thing.

Sofia - here, it is all high school after year seven.

So - you blamed him for increased oral sex in middle school.

That is fully as ridiculous a claim as the other!!!

We ar equibbling about whether the elephant in the room is blue or pink - the point is that it is an elephant!

I was copping blowjobs from school girls in the early 60's. When Kennedy was president. Get real with this Clinton bullshit.

Well, Bear me dear - you wos a lucky bear indeed.

Of course, if Nixon had won, there would have been no blowjobs for you, you naughty li'l Bear, you!