8
   

Galactic Matyhematics.

 
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Sep, 2014 02:50 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Not to worried as long as you can't solve

1/(x+4) + 1/(x+3)=1/(x+2) + 1/(2x+11) using VM.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 04:58 am
Well, I see it is way too much to ask, and one person here is so stupid to "answer " the question by giving just an other sum, so that proves to me he can't do it at all of course. And he is a little thick and sick in the head.
He probably doesn't even understand the sum at all.


But maybe there is someone out there who can do this, but I doubt it a lot,


engineer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 06:08 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Still working on

1/(x+4) + 1/(x+3)=1/(x+2) + 1/(2x+11) using VM.

or have you given up?
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 11:10 am
Quote:
1 Reply
User ignored (view)


And some people are prone to the impossibility of learning! Wink
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 11:58 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Yet my simple problem, just one of yours with a couple of numbers changed, completely stumps you. Face it, VM is just a series of interesting math tricks that might be fun to know but doesn't provide a robust set of tools for doing basic math. Your attempt to find 1/17 was comical compared to "traditional math." Most of the little tricks you've displayed here (like multiplying by 11 or squaring numbers ending in 5) were taught to me as a child. A quick search for Vedic math shows the low regard vm is held in. Check out the Wikipedia entry for Vedic math. Your position that "traditional math" is inferior to a set of math tricks is clearly wrong. That said, you can prove me wrong, not by answering one of your own specially prepared problems but by answering one of mine.

1/(x+4) + 1/(x+3)=1/(x+2) + 1/(2x+11) using VM.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 12:06 pm
Quote:
1 Reply
User ignored (view)



And some people are prone to the impossibility of learning

Come on, keep that stupidity coming!


what a moron this one is!
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 12:57 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
If you want to make your point, you will have to answer my question. It is interesting that you respond to every post but refuse to answer the question. Can vm solve anything other than the simple, special case problems you post? Right now, it is clear the answer is no.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 02:23 pm
It/he/she is really a good joke
Wink

I do hope it reacts again and again and again! Yumie...


engineer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 02:35 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
Anyone reading this thread will note that you refuse/cannot rise up to what is a simple challenge. Your claims about vm are tarnished by your inability to defend it. Trying to ignore those who challenge you harm your position further. Solve my problem or admit you can't and explain why.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 02:38 pm
Yummie



lol , this one needs a life! lol

please once more little kiddie!
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Sep, 2014 04:45 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
As long as it takes.

1/(x+4) + 1/(x+3)=1/(x+2) + 1/(2x+11) using VM.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 01:10 am
lol

again!! Come'on you can do it kiddie!



lol, he really can't think at all.
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 05:11 am
@Quehoniaomath,
Sure.

1/(x+4) + 1/(x+3)=1/(x+2) + 1/(2x+11) using VM.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 05:33 am
It really is a pity that this idiotic child is on a destructive path and wants to destroy things this kiddie can't comprehend,

It is a sad sad world.
0 Replies
 
Lordyaswas
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 05:42 am
Well, I don't know about anyone else, but I am of the opinion that engineer has now proved beyond doubt that Q is all mouth and no trousers.

We all knew that anyway, but it's nice to see it confirmed to clearly.

Well done, engineer.
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 08:12 am
@Lordyaswas,
Beyond a doubt???? YOU MUST BE KIDDING!!!

no he hasn't done that at all. far from it, So you must be blind too!

You really have no clue at all.

Kiddie answers a sum with another sum.

Try that one at achool.

it is really just a kiddie on a very destructive path

THIS is whta is going on with our kiddie, and she doesn't get it:

Quote:
There is a world-wide debate currently raging about the efficacy of Vedic Mathematics versus the crumbling foundations of Western Mathematics.
Generally speaking, the theorems we all learned at school are not wrong but clumsy. Some of the Western geometrical formulae are certainly wrong or inadequate: for example, the formulae for sphere packing in the higher dimensions increase up to the 6th Dimension then suddenly decrease for higher dimensions, which is simply absurd.
Unfortunately, some die-hard senior mathematicians in an attempt to protect the crumbling foundations that they now stand on feel threatened by the lightning quick mental calculations of the Vedic seers, and go to great lengths to deride Vedic maths as a "bag of tricks". And of course, many insecure teachers worldwide are afraid to rewrite all their course material.


It is extremely obvious to see that some real trolls here just even don't want this and are not even curious.

They just want to be destructive, and don't see that everything around them is being rewritten as we speak. mathematics, physics etc etc.
They are all gowing down because these systems are plain wrong.



It is really a pitty that these kind of kiddies really exist.
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 08:13 am
@Quehoniaomath,
The challenge isn't hard, it is just something that can't be solved with a math trick.

1/(x+4) + 1/(x+3)=1/(x+2) + 1/(2x+11) using VM.
0 Replies
 
Quehoniaomath
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 08:36 am
as I said, Kiddie is destructive. a pity, but so be it.

She has to grow up.

she really can't understand these systems and don't even try to understand.

But you know what kiddie, you are very good at killing threads.

Kind of a psychopath in my view.
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 08:42 am
@Quehoniaomath,
All I ask is that you prove your system works on a problem that isn't thought up ahead of time and can be solved with a trick. You are failing here.

1/(x+4) + 1/(x+3)=1/(x+2) + 1/(2x+11) using VM.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Oct, 2014 12:26 pm
@Quehoniaomath,
So prove engineer is simply deriding VM and show us how to solve his equation in VM.

Because you have yet to solve it shows engineer is the one presenting facts about VM.
 

Related Topics

Oddities and Humor - Discussion by edgarblythe
Let's play "Caption the Photo" II - Discussion by gustavratzenhofer
JIM NABORS WAS GOY? - Question by farmerman
Funny Pictures ***Slow Loading*** - Discussion by JerryR
Caption The Cartoon - Discussion by panzade
Geek and Nerd Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Caption The Cartoon Part Deux - Discussion by panzade
IS IT OK FOR ME TO CHEAT? - Question by Setanta
2008 Election: Political Humor - Discussion by Robert Gentel
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 11:22:34