Lightwizard wrote:
If this is an all out comedy of errors genre of satirical comedy I could find it both entertaining and enlightening even if I am sometimes skeptical of Moore's tactics.
Then we are presented with a list of quotes from ehbeth which seem intended to vindicate publicity stunts.
Now, Lightwizard receives an e-mail from Moore (Who, as we all know, is an impeccable source of the truth) , claiming he's been wronged, and LW and ehbeth are back on that track and offering to serve up crow.
This is rich.
Irrespective of how one feels about the porcine Mr Moore, this is not an issue of first ammendment rights or even censorship in its broadest definition.
As has already been pointed out in this thread, Moore doesn't have a legally protected right to have his movies produced or distributed. Except, perhaps, in the minds of a few of his more paranoid fans, the government is not at all involved in trying to stifle his opinion or punish him for it.
Rejecting Moore's film because it doesn't fit the Disney brand may be hypocritical but it's not censorship.
Moore is correct that Miramax was created to provide Disney with an outlet for products that didn't fit the Disney brand, and so it is, at best, disingenuous for them to trot out brand protection in this case. It's much more likely that one colossal ass (Eisner) was simply somehow chapped off by an even bigger ass (Moore), but even if they thought Moore's "Farenheit 9/11," was too hot for Miramax, this would be a business decision, not censorship.
Moore's products have been enough of a commercial success that it is very unlikely that he won't find a new distributor in a relatively short period of time. It may not have the cache of Miramax, but that's show biz.
His promise to bring his new film to the people even if he has to travel around and show it in city parks is, frankly, nauseating. I'm not sure which is more pathetic, that this millionaire clown might actually believe that he is an oppressed champion of free speech and the "little guy," or that the "little guy," (like the one offering the side of his house as a screen) buys into his elephantine ego trip.
I'm sure it has crossed Moore's mind that a road show with "folk screenings" in city parks would be a great source of the publicity he seems to hunger for as much as he hungers for fried twinkies, but I suspect his business sense will get the better of him, and you fans will have to settle for seeing his film in your local theatres.