@McTag,
McTag wrote:You may very well think that. Others may choose to differ.
I'm not sure which thing that I think that you are talking about, (and about which some alleged 'others' may differ) so I'll have a go at both the things I have mentioned.
1. The phrase 'idealized desire' (I use the American spelling of the original quote) - this exact phrase is, you might say, a technical term, commonly used in fields such as psychology, philosophy, ethics, and so on. It is often used when considering the topic of the human condition. It has precisely the same meaning as in the original quote, that is, a desire which is 'idealized' is one for a condition or goal which can not be satisfied in the real world. This is to be contrasted with a practical or 'real' desire, which can be satisfied in the real world. You might say in simple language that an idealized desire is something that people want because they have been told that they do. The distinction between an idealized desire and a real one is the whole point of the section quoted. I think that for me to say this is not abstruse nor is it a literary flourish.
2. The fact that a desire can be the wanting of a thing or the thing itself. I would have thought that this was both an innocuous and thunderingly obvious thing to say. I feel a desire (inside myself) for the chief accountant's job. My desire is the chief account's job (which outside myself, there, in the world), I feel a desire (in my head, and also further down) for a juicy steak. My desire is the steak which I can smell being cooked in the kitchen (out there). I should have thought that this was a fairly relevant thing to remark upon.
Also, the fact of my 'agreeing with JTT'. This is purely a coincidence. Should disagree with him on principle? That would be silly.