24
   

Congratulations, House Republicans!

 
 
parados
 
  2  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 10:01 am
@coldjoint,
Islamists are persons that practice islam. They are what you said you don't blame. You said you blame Islam not Muslims but you are now blaming over 400 million muslims when you just said you don't blame them.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 10:07 am


Listen to some facts.
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 01:08 pm
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/imgs/2014/140505-obvious-partisan-exercise.jpg
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 01:09 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Listen to some facts.


Great advice! When will you try just that yourself?
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 01:22 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
A lot are in mass graves, some have been thrown to packs of wild dogs, and some have been hung from bridges or buildings.


Laughable on a couple of levels. How does one hide evidence of mass killing by throwing the bodies to "wild dogs" and hanging them from "bridges or buildings." Anybody wanting to hide bodies buries them deeper than "wild dogs" can dig them up and scatter bones everywhere where they can be found. Don't ask me how I might know that.

It takes infrastructure and time to forget and die so as to hide bodies in mass graves. Funny how you claim unfindable bodies hidden in mass graves and thrown to "wild dogs", "hung under bridges and from buildings". And yet deny the found bodies of Muslims in Bosnia-Herzegovina as being those massacred by Serbian regular military units. Or the Serb siege of Sarajevo sniping and killing civilians gathering wood or water or food.

It be funny it weren't so true.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 01:25 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
That's been proven in the Killing Fields of Cambodia. People like ice brain doesn't know much about anything, and posts bull shyt he think has any credibility.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 01:45 pm
The Rude Pundit - The Benghazis the GOP Will Never Touch
The Rude Pundit was going to write a long, graphic, stomach-churning piece about various Republicans, like Darrell Issa, Lindsey Graham, and Trey Gowdy, doing horrible things to themselves and each other sexually using the bones of dead U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens as implements of penetration. There would have been dildo talk, there would have been cries of pain and joy, there would have been gushes of ejaculate and feces all over one another and all over the hearing rooms of the Congress and all over the media and all over their base, who just eat it up, and maybe even all over Hillary Clinton. It would have been vile and depraved, and some of you might have found it shocking and funny, and some of you might have found it shocking and gross, and more than a few of you would have been turned on, and perhaps some of you might have taken notes for use later. That's the kind of service this blog offers.

It would have all been written as a metaphor about the GOP's monomania about What Happened at Benghazi, something that really has no relation anymore to what happened at Benghazi, at that American consulate in Libya some twenty months ago, when four Americans were killed in the chaos of terrorist attacks and riots over whatever people were rioting about. The metaphor would have demonstrated, through nauseating imagery, exactly why Republicans are still beating this drum, even though the drumhead was worn out and torn a long time ago. Yeah, all of that was loaded and cocked and ready to fire.

And then, out of curiosity, the Rude Pundit was reading a bit, and this story came up: "4 Dead, 24 Wounded in Weekend Chicago Violence." It's about how many people were murdered or hurt, mostly by gunfire, in the Windy City just this past Saturday and Sunday.

If this was being written last Monday, the headline would have been "43 Shot, 5 Killed, in Spate of Weekend Violence in Chicago."

If it had been the week before last, the headline would have been "At Least 8 Dead, 44 Wounded In Weekend Shootings."

And on and on heading backwards for as long as you care to look.

In other words, there's at least a Benghazi every weekend in Chicago. Sometimes it's twice a Benghazi. Yet there are no congressional hearings about the dead Americans in Chicago. There's no admonishment of politicians for having policies that contribute to the violence, like the nation's lax gun laws (yeah, Chicago's got strict gun control, which totally doesn't prevent people from getting weapons an hour away). There's no movement on the federal government's part, through action by Congress, to pass things like the Youth PROMISE Act, which at least would establish ways to try to deal with the violence that plagues so many places.

But those are gangs doing most of the murdering, mostly black and Hispanic Americans killing mostly black and Hispanic Americans, not filthy Arabs killing noble white men.

Darrell Issa and Trey Gowdy and whoever else are going to lead the latest bullshit hearings on whatever bullshit committee bullshit leader John Boehner pulls out of his orange ass. If they won't even acknowledge the little Benghazis that are doing far more harm to the nation than a dozen burned-down consulates, they can go **** themselves with...well, see above.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2014/05/the-benghazis-gop-will-never-touch.html
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 01:46 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Laughable on a couple of levels. How does one hide evidence of mass killing by throwing the bodies to "wild dogs" and hanging them from "bridges or buildings."


Laughable except for the fear it creates. They could care less what happens to the dead.

Quote:
Funny how you claim unfindable bodies hidden in mass graves and

Try the mass graves in what used to be Armenia. Try the mass graves in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Islam responsible for every one.
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 02:05 pm
Quote:
White House Suggests it Won’t Cooperate with Benghazi Panel


What is news there?
Quote:
“We have always cooperated with legitimate oversight,” Carney said


Who the Hell are they to determine legitimacy?

http://www.whitehousedossier.com/2014/05/05/white-house-suggests-cooperate-benghazi-panel/
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 02:16 pm


Quote:
Former CBS News reporter Sharyl Attkisson said on Monday that there is a “well-orchestrated” strategy to marginalize the Benghazi story by the Obama White House in order to make it go away.

Reacting to a heated exchange between conservative radio talk show host Laura Ingraham and Obama spinmeister David Plouffe on ABC News’ This Week, in which Plouffe attempted to spin the narrative that the Benghazi story was being promoted by a “delusional minority” of the GOP, Attkisson told Fox and Friends on Monday that:

“The key words they use, such as ‘conspiracy’ and ‘delusional,’ are in my opinion clearly designed to try to controversialize a story — a legitimate news story and a legitimate area of journalistic inquiry.”

“I see that as a well-orchestrated strategy to controversialize a story they really don’t want to hear about.” said Attkisson.


She nailed it.

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/05/05/sharyl-attkisson-well-orchestrated-strategy-by-the-obama-white-house-to-delegitimize-benghazi-story/
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 02:37 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:

Try the mass graves in what used to be Armenia. Try the mass graves in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Islam responsible for every one.


So who's denying the Armenian Genocide? Even the Turks admit it. Wasn't as if they hid the evidence. You seem to be arguing against your own hidden massacres.

When will you address the issue of your own denial of Muslems murdered in the tens of thousands by Serb "Christians"?
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 02:39 pm
What happens on Fox when Obamacare succeeds . . .

These numbers, pulled from every Fox transcript on Nexis for the dates in question, tells the story of what happens when it becomes clear that Obamacare is succeeding: Conservatives start avoiding Obamacare ... and start spending their time talking about other stuff, like Benghazi:

http://images.dailykos.com/images/82125/large/benghaziobamacare550.png

These numbers, pulled from every Fox transcript on Nexis for the dates in question, tells the story of what happens when it becomes clear that Obamacare is succeeding: Conservatives start avoiding Obamacare ... and start spending their time talking about other stuff, like Benghazi . . .


. . . with Cliven Bundy thrown in.

http://images.dailykos.com/images/82118/large/foxbenghaziobamacare.png
Baldimo
 
  2  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 02:45 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Yet you failed to mention that the spike was due to another round of released emails the admin refused to give up. Facts with no context? Naw, you wouldn't do that would you?
coldjoint
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 02:46 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
When will you address the issue of your own denial of Muslems murdered in the tens of thousands by Serb "Christians"?


I have. The whole thing is propaganda. Muslims(Islam) have always been the aggressor. I do not consider stopping an aggressor murder.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  0  
Reply Mon 5 May, 2014 02:47 pm
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Bi0JahxCcAAN6ai.jpg:large
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 07:41 am
@Baldimo,
Have you bothered to read the emails Baldimo? I doubt it.

There is really nothing newsworthy in them unless you misrepresent what they contain.
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 08:14 am
@parados,
I read the emails, but made no comment as to their content. I simply stated that new emails were released last week, and that is the reason for the spike in coverage. It wasn't for no reason, new emails were released that had to be requested via a Freedom of Information Act request. The emails were released that contained information that hadn't been seen before.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 08:17 am
@Baldimo,
Really? What info hadn't been seen before?
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 08:22 am
@parados,
The info in the emails. It was all new and had never been seen before except by the people who wrote them. Had you seen the content of the emails before they were released? Did you know what was in them?
bobsal u1553115
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 08:22 am
@Baldimo,
Quote:
I simply stated that new emails were released last week, and that is the reason for the spike in coverage. It wasn't for no reason, new emails were released that had to be requested via a Freedom of Information Act request. The emails were released that contained information that hadn't been seen before.


I'll bite. What new information was released that 13 Congressional investigations, 51 Congressional briefings, 250,000 documents and pages of reports, 100's of news reports, hours upon hours of Fox hand wringing, 1000's of already released e-mails didn't disclose?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2025 at 02:34:14