@bobsal u1553115,
I have a personal reason for disliking the John Birch Society. I once said the following in another topic several years ago; but I'd like to say it again, especially in relation to your post above, bobsal.
I have a sister who attended a college in Colorado from the fall of 1961 through the spring of 1965. She was a member of a sorority at a time when the organization had racist bylaws excluding blacks and Jews from membership. She happened to have a Jewish friend whom she wanted to be able to join her sorority. Of course, she was generally opposed to discrimination. So, she and another member of her sorority launched a petition to the national headquarters urging them to drop the racist bylaws.
She also once participated in a
peaceful demonstration against the "whites only" hiring practices of the largest employer in the town.
(Again, the record of political conservatives at this time was . . . ?)
The John Birch Society ludicrously claimed that the civil rights movement of the 1950s and the 1960s had been launched by Communists -- that it, in fact, was a Communist plot. Of course, they claimed Martin Luther King Jr. was a Communist. (They were rather loose in their accusations. They also accused Dwight Eisenhower of being a communist.
)
So, eventually the Houston chapter of the John Birch Society publicly announced to the news media that my sister was a Communist! If this had happened during the McCarthy period, the chances of her getting a decent job afterwards would have been nil. To the contrary, as far as I'm concerned, my sister was performing a public service to this country by opposing the discriminatory practices I've just described. In fact, I'm very proud of her. To falsely accuse someone of being a Communist is as despicable as falsely accusing someone of being a pedophile.
To add icing to the cake, so to speak, in 1971 my sister introduced me to a very interesting book she had been reading:
The Confession -- which is the autobiography of Artur London, who had served as a Deputy Foreign Minister in the Stalinist regime of Clement Gottwald over Czechoslovakia. Although he had been a dedicated Communist for many years, he was arrested by the secret police when Stalin had ordered the ruling Communist Party of that country to stage a political show trial. The result was the infamous Slansky trial in which 14 leading Communists (11 of whom happened to be of Jewish descent) were charged with treason. The trial was conducted with anti-Semitic overtones. Every single one of the defendants were innocent, but they were all convicted. The secret police had forced them all to incriminate themselves. Eleven of them were executed; the remaining three (including London) were given life terms, but were pardoned after the death of Stalin. London and his family were allowed to immigrate to France.
Of course, London's biography concentrates upon his horrific experience. He was tortured by the secret police and was "broken" so that he would be willing to make his "confession" during the trial and falsely incriminate himself. The secret police could make anyone confess to anything. Needless to say, the book is a searing indictment of the Stalinist police state.
My sister was and still is quite liberal. But she was opposed to Communist regimes as she was opposed to all cruel dictatorships. So much for my sister's "Communism."
I have absolutely no respect for the John Birch Society and little patience for their defenders.