Real Benghazi Scandal

Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2014 06:56 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Well thank you, Finn. But let's not get off topic with these planned diversions. The USA is, beyond the shadow of a doubt, the biggest terrorist group on the planet.

You find it surprising that he was a terrorist? Why? It's simply not possible that he was out of the loop on the USA's terrorist involvements in the Middle East.
Finn dAbuzz
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2014 06:59 pm
Ho Hum
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2014 07:06 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Why is it, Finn, that as soon as things get uncomfortable, all manner of escape mode comes out?

Cuba - classic example of USA terrorism for the last sixty years.

Vietnam - the CIA were in there early and often; another prime example of USA terrorism, this time for over 40 years.

Iran 1950s - USA terrorism

Nicaragua, Guatemala, panama, ... the list goes on and on.
0 Replies
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2014 09:41 pm
parados wrote:

Your assertion, however, was that the diplomats didn't ask for help and that such a belief was even fantastical.

My assertion was that they didn't ask for more help in Benghazi. Tripoli asked for help. It is a fantasy to believe that is the same as Benghazi.

I also linked the actual request sent by the Tripoli diplomats that you are claiming asked for help in Benghazi. Now you are arguing your own beliefs instead of the facts it seems.

Either American diplomats in Libya did ask for help in Benghazi, or else it's a widely held mistaken belief.
And although it found that "certain senior State Department officials within two bureaus demonstrated a lack of proactive leadership" when Benghazi asked for more protection, the report said that no employees breached their duty.


In either case, believing it would not be indicative of someone out of touch with reality. And, incidentally, even if it were only true that they asked for security help in Tripoli, didn't get it, and then a fatal attack occurred in a different Libyan embassy, it would hardly be something for the State Department to be proud of, since it would at least indicate that security in Libya wasn't taken very seriously.
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2014 09:45 pm
Except that you are seriously out of touch with reality, Brandon.
0 Replies
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2014 02:34 pm
Why are you people still discussing Benghazi? It has been made clear that there is no scandal there, and that the right is only keeping the matter alive to score points against the Obama administration.

Besides, Benghazi is a piffle compared to Reagan's stupidity in Lebanon, which caused the slaughter of about 250 marines. The right never uttered a word of criticism of Reagan and his people in that matter.
Reply Sat 15 Mar, 2014 02:47 pm
A: Besides, Benghazi is a piffle compared to Reagan's stupidity in Lebanon, which caused the slaughter of about 250 marines. The right never uttered a word of criticism of Reagan and his people in that matter.

Not only the right, A, the left too. And 250 marines is SFA. Always you ******* self ansorbed Americans whining about your own when it's y'all that is causing all the trouble.

What of the 50,000 Nicaraguans Reagan slaughtered, after he had them raped and tortured?

0 Replies
bobsal u1553115
Reply Sun 23 Nov, 2014 02:26 pm
Graham: House Benghazi report is ‘full of crap’
Source: Washington Times

Sen. Lindsey Graham said Sunday that a report on the Benghazi attack released late last week is “full of crap.”

The GOP-led House committee’s report found no failures in intelligence in connection with the 2011 attack on the U.S. consulate in Libya and also found that any misinformation released after the attack was accidentally incorrect — not a deliberate attempt to mislead people.

But Mr. Graham, South Carolina Republican, said on CNN’s “State of the Union” that the report is inaccurate and that the House Intelligence Committee that released the report accepted a “bunch of garbage.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/23/graham-house-benghazi-report-full-crap/
Reply Mon 24 Nov, 2014 07:45 am
@bobsal u1553115,
Figures he would say something similar, kind of surprising he would use those exact words, but I guess it could have been worse.
0 Replies

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 10/17/2019 at 07:24:27