@Lash,
Lash wrote:
It's not a treaty - no legal bind. It's a memorandum. And if your country is worried about it, your country should deal with it.
Yes, Europe should be dealing with this crisis, and to be fair, they're not ignoring it, but by now they should be able to deal with regional affairs without relying upon their big American brother.
Why don't they? Because they know that we will always step in (at least attempting) to save the day.
I'm not advocating isolationism. There is a pay-off for being the world's policeman, but I expect our leaders to maximize that pay-off and they are not, and if they won't, then for as long as they are in power they should leave the heavy lifting to others, and let the world see what happens when there isn't a superpower patrolling the streets.
If Obama has accomplished anything in terms of foreign policy it might be that he has taught the rest of the world not to always rely on the US. Alas the rest of the world that loves the internationally introverted Obama when the fat isn't on the fire, can just wait a few years for someone with more gusto.
We should move all of our military resources in Europe to the East. Countries like Poland, Latvia, Estonia, et al would like nothing better than to have American bases and troops on their soil, and doing so would present a far greater deterrant to Russian expansionism than begrudged installations in Western Europe.
The chances of Putin invading Germany or the UK are miniscule. Not so as respects the Baltic States.
Western European military installations should be an investment. If there is no return on them the capital needs to be invested elsewhere.