Quote:I wish they would realize that the history of marriage is being twisted and misrepresented by the right.
The primary purpose of marriage has been about family alliances, transferring property, and having heirs to continue the family bloodlines all throughout history. This has changed to some degree and extent to include love, but that concept is by no means universal. Arranged marriages are still very common in the world today, and trusting a person to make his/her own choices about love and marriage is seen as foolish by the parents.
I am all for gay marriage, but even if I was not, I do not think it is as catastrophic a topic as politicians make it out to be.
Let me clarify: I keep hearing politicians talking about how gays being allowed to marry will hurt families and result in the loss of families. I think (and I may be biased having a cousin who is career military) that the nearly 1k soldiers who are dying in the middle east currently is more likely to have an impact on me or my neighborhood or someone I know than if two women anywhere marry.
This country is a Christian country, but it is not a theocracy. It is supposed to be about freedom from persecution, "life-liberty-pursuit of happiness", etc. It is not suppose to condone racism, or sexism, or classism. Marriage carries a lot of
civil benefits with it, and that is something very important to same-sex couples, especially in this age where companies do not like giving their employees health insurance.
I think society might actually become more stable and have a greater interest in "family values" (whatever those are) if it had more married couples in it.