@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:
I don't care. They put zoo animals in cages. Why not something that many find distasteful?
Because one of the virtues of art is that it can be provocative.
Why not just put a statue of pretty life like flowers in it's place, unless of course we get complaints of people who have hay fever.
Looking over other pictures of the statue, actually it's quite small, obviously the size of a human, placed in a very large open area. Very easy to avoid looking at it.
I saw a comment that it triggers thoughts of sexual assault.
My thoughts are I would more likely to think of this in a sexual or violent way if it was placed indoors.
As it is, it's a representation of a person being at his most helpless.
He's near naked, asleep and out in the cold. If he were to wake up, he would be terrified, not trying to terrify or harm others.
The man is fast asleep, he's not trying, or thinking about assaulting anyone. He's not conscious of his surroundings, and he is in fact the one who is vulnerable and in danger.
I think it would lose it's impact, and just become an uninteresting object if it was indoors. The whole idea is that it's unexpected and out of context.
If I saw what is in the picture below, my first thought was "My God, I have to go help that guy!" and not "I'll bet he's wandering out here in the cold/snow just waiting to sexually assualt someone."