David Henry wrote:Craven de Kere wrote:[]
In this case, A2M that is preceeded by an enema (which some do) should be morally acceptable to you.
WOW, aren't you so well informed
David, "well informed" is actually a good thing. You'll have to find something else for your ad hominems. ;-)
Quote:I continue to tell you the truth, even if you can't understand it...here it is again.
Oh I understand it, I just don't accept your
ipse dixit as "truth".
Quote:You've effectively attempted to demonize my ick factor even though it's based on an objective criteria{people don't eat or suck on **** smeared objects and allow animals to cum in their mouths}.
Correct, I do not accept your criteria as a moral issue. I accept it as an issue of one's health and of individual taste between consenting adults.
Quote:My disgust, and yours is based upon that objective knowledge, therefore we as rational people{unless Charlie's opinion is as good as yours} determine that this behaviour is immoral and we ACT against it...just as we do with murder.
Here you make a logical leap of faith. I think terminating someone's existence against their will is immoral. I think a mutually agreed upon health risk is not necessarily so.
In any case, if it is merely the health factors you object to an enema should take care of your concerns.
Quote:Focus on my objective criteria rather than the fact that I've had the audacity to speak the truth.
Aww, don't start with the voice-crying-in-the-wilderness "truth" bunk. You have an
opinion that you'd like to assert as a universal
truth. That doesn't make it so.