Quote:snood wrote:Once again, Frank apisa stinks up the place with his woefully un-self aware hubris.
Quote:Nowhere have I ever even intimated that I am the only one who can accurately state the agnostic positon...so the sarcasm is inappropriate
Not only have you "even intimated" it, - several people C & P 'ed definitions of agnosticism from reference books which you went immediately about dismantling, in favor of your better, more nuanced, more profound definition. I remember it - it won't suprise me if you don't though - it directly contradicts your latest attempt at appearing open-minded.
Once again, Snood, allows his hot-headedness to interfere with what little thinking he brings to his comments.
Snood made a statement...I countered that statement...and now poor Snood is in a huff.
If I have ever said that I am the only person who can state the agnostic position...and you know where I said it...quote it, Snood...or shut the hell up, because you are boring with your silliness.
I have tried, in almost ever post where I am dealing with my agnosticism, to let everyone know that I am describing MY AGNOSTICISM. Atheists do that all the time; theists do that all the time....and I sure as hell have the right to do it also.
Occasionally, I make comments that I think are general to agnostics...but nowhere have I ever said this is the ONLY POSSIBLE TAKE ON THE MATTER.
In short...I have never said I am the only one who can accurately state the agnostic position...I have never intimated that I am the only one who can accurately state the agnostic position. I may have intimated that I am the only one who can accurately state MY AGNOSTIC POSITION...but that is a given.
I understand that most of your arguments are pitiful, Snood...so I also understand why you want to misrepresent what people say and argue against that misrepresentation. What the hell...at least in yourself, you have found someone dumb enough so that you might prevail in an argument or two. No offense taken.
