snood wrote:Oh, I forgot - no one can accurately state the agnostic position except Frank Apisa - not even Webster, or Collier's. And you'll have a hard time trying to pigeonhole my "religion", ole buddy, but go ahead. You probably think you have a real good handle on it.
Once again, Snood misrepresents someone else's opinion...so that he can argue against his mischaracterization...instead of against the truth.
But that seems to be a habit with Snood...and obviously a habit he is having a hard time trying to break.
Nowhere have I ever even intimated that I am the only one who can accurately state the agnostic positon...so the sarcasm is inappropriate.
What I did in my last post was merely to let you know that you were wrong when you said, "I know that after an agnostic assures us that no one can be sure of anything for the millionth time..."
Actually...the statement makes no goddam sense at all. How can anyone, agnostic, atheists, theist or anyone else...ASSURE anyone that NO ONE CAN BE SURE OF ANYTHING...???
So it is absurd to suppose an agnostic would do it.
Anyway...that is just another example of Snood inventing things so that he can argue against his invention.
One would think that if a person goes to the trouble of inventing something...he would be careful enough to invent something that people will not laugh at.