So much for reasoned debate from the Guns and Ammo crowd.
Too funny Max!
If the article was 100% progun/antigun-reformation and said editor was fired by any published institution then the gun nuts would be crying out 1st Amendment foul as a violation of their free speech. Only when it's a fair and reasoned critique against guns and the 2nd Amendment when they fail to invoke the 1st Amendment rights of said mentioned editor.
There is never an understanding let alone attempt at reasoned compromise with these guys. 16 hours of training?! You must be the worstest Nazi-Commie to think that's a reasonable provision to allow a person to get his CCW license.
Its a question of principle
( I 'm surprized that u found out about our controversy.
Lemme explain it to u this way:
if u have a yard sale, u can negotiate prices of used furniture
with the customers, but if one of them offers u money to **** your little girl
or to sodomize your little boy, that is beyond the realm of bargaining
It is "out of the question"
as we used to say, and the offeror might be invited
to leave the premises (as distinct from being asked for a better offer).
U see, gentlemen, the point is that the same as government was not
invested with jurisdiction to choose your favorite color for u,
nor to select your religion for u, so also authority over a citizen 's possession
of defensive guns was and is beyond the reach of its jurisdiction
We don 't like and we do not condone USURPATIONS
of power by government.
That editor can still talk about it all he wants.
We won 't stop him. We have not stopped the other advocates
of victim dis
armament. Thay can all talk and write.