maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2017 06:47 am
@maunas24-10-13,

A dark matter/mass singularity is the gravitational field of the cosmos which becomes infinite in a way that does not depend on the coordinate system. Since such quantities will become infinite within the big bang singularity, the laws of normal space-time cannot exist.
0 Replies
 
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2017 06:54 am
@maunas24-10-13,
A dark matter/mass singularity is the gravitational field of the cosmos which becomes infinite in a way that does not depend on the coordinate system. Since such quantities will become infinite within the big bang singularity, the laws of normal space-time cannot exist.

The cause of big bang inflation which formed this universe instantly, was effected by the infinite potential NEGATIVE gravity of the dark NEGATIVE mass within the big bang singularity. The inflation ends with the simultaneous begining of formation of universe's basic structures and the dark negative mass changing it's phase to DARK POSITIVE mass due to it's interaction with the "tremendously high energy density with randomness" which inundated the infant universe.

Singularity! Because entangled.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Aug, 2017 02:31 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
"Dark MASS" not " Dark MATTER", and, "mass" unlike "matter" does not require any space to RESIDE. Moreover multiple independent singularities can exist at the same dimensionless point.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Aug, 2017 02:38 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Under this topic some years back (2013-2014), i had suggested, using the logic of till date repeatedly proved theory of relativity and earlier proved laws of physics, that, mass= energy= time= space= force. So asking where did the dark mass reside before the big bang, when there was no universe (space), is like asking, WHERE DOES THE SPACE RESIDE?
Like steam, water and ice, "mass , energy, space, time and force are different phases of the same entity, the fundamental entity of existence, and, these phases themselves are all of existence creating the universe, so, they can exist independent of any preformed universe or a big bang singularity point of any universe.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Aug, 2017 12:04 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Matter;: (Physics) mass with extension in space time makes it matter . Matter is made up of non fundamental particles. The only fundamental particle in the universe ( the combinations of which are rest other particles found by particle physicists is graviton. Graviton is the particle which makes quantum space.

Gravitons are not matter as long as they compact absolutely to form pure mass, but as soon as they decay out of dark mass bulk/ strings to form the fabric of space time, they tend to conglomerate to form all sorts of elementary particles including the Higg's boson which is thought to give mass to non fundamental particles.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Aug, 2017 08:10 am
@maunas24-10-13,
Inflation after the big bang tore apart space into filaments, sheets and spherical halos which got occupied by dark mass particles which further condensed in to structures of absolute dark mass. This formed a complex network of dark mass the cosmic web. Later, matter was drawn inside the densest knots of this web, aggregated into clumps where the first stars formed and then assembled into galaxies. Since dark mass particles are not part of the standard model of particle physics, henceforth i will abstain from calling them GRAVITONS.
Singularity! Because entangled.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Aug, 2017 08:24 am
@maunas24-10-13,
Dark mass particles were able to occupy torn out absent quantum space regions because they are continuously creating space by self decay.
Singularity! Because entangled.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Aug, 2017 05:17 am
@maunas24-10-13,
Even if dark mass particles did not decay into space, they are capable of existing in garbled spacelessness because they are not matter. The provenance of dark mass particles is is also the big bang singularity same as it is for time and space.
Singularity! Because entangled.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2017 08:27 am
@maunas24-10-13,
maunas wrote:
As described in the OP at:http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=80&t=18544
That depression is obligatory for differentiation or diversification and inflation is obligatory for growth and both the actions are necessary for each other. The extension of this logic to cosmology means that all motion has wave properties. So expansion of space accelerates and decelerates. First the cosmic singularity inflated very quickly followed by a leisurely phase of expansion and then after about 5 billion years it has again started accelerated expansion. AND WE ARE POSTULATING DARK ENERGY BEHIND THIS PHENOMENON OF ACCELERATION.


What i blurted out years ago under some topics, and also under this one above is now also being said by some physicists.

SEE: https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/ ... ssippi/amp

Same wave like dilatation and compression (acceleration and deacceleration) occurs during differentiation/evolution of life, eg. The Sahaara pump for human evolution, economic inflation followed by depression of economies, the joining and dispersal of continents causing diversity of life etc. This wave like character seems to be a universal phenomena necessary for producing a variety of entities which are part of our existence.
Singularity! Because entangled.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Tue 15 Aug, 2017 01:14 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
From the link in the above post:
physicists Lawrence Mead and Harry Ringermacher from The University of Southern Mississippi (USM), say that the universe is oscillating, or “ringing”, as the expansion slows down slightly – seven times to be precise since the Big Bang.

It is interesting to note that according to Hindu scriptures,"it is presently the aeon of the seventh manu and it is mid day of this universe which will end after the fourteenth manvantar (aeon/ringing)."
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Aug, 2017 12:55 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
MATTER first converts in to DARK MATTER and then in to DARK ENERGY.



A Correction now, in the above statement which i blurted on 26 oct 2013

Dark matter/mass converts to normal visible matter first, and then, it converts into quantum space by normal matters decay. Quantum space eats dark mass and grows, expanding the universe in the process.

Singularity! Because entangled.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 07:59 am
@maunas24-10-13,
Dark matter is not matter. It is pure mass because it does not encapsulate space into it's structure. It existed independent of big bang singularity. It is decaying in to quantum vacuum producing space, the rate of production of which is increasing due to decreasing mass of dark matter. This is causing accelerated expansion of space. Dark Energy need not exist in this scenario
.
The statement above, which i posted under this topic on 29 July 2017, is now also supported by a group of physicists:
See: Mysteries of the universe deepen as scientists say dark energy is NOT real http://shr.gs/mrCSqgN

Quote from the article:
By constructing computer simulations that compare a standard cosmological model with one that only had dark matter – which is equally mysterious and accounts for all the unseen matter in the universe – and normal matter, they found that both act very similarly, suggesting that there is no need for dark energy.

Singularity, because entangled.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Aug, 2017 11:55 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
If energy decays finally into quantum space and E=MC^2 then
S=E C^2. where S is quantum space, E is the energy converted into space and C stands for speed of light.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2017 01:20 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
*Force is an entity which seems to increase or decrease entropy. Space is of two types, one which is mass (knotty space), the other is more or less plain. Force becomes noticeable as motion. Force divides space while effecting motion, the mental quantification of divisions of space produced by motion is felt by us as time.*
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2017 11:45 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
The mental quantification of divisions of space produced by motion as compared (relative) to an arbitrarily selected standard quantification produced by some other motion concurrently gives us a sense of time.
Singularity! Because entangled.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Oct, 2017 12:05 am
@maunas24-10-13,
Gravitons, if they exist, are anti-entropy particles. Dark mass/ matter is made up of anti- entropy particles. Particles which prevent entropy from increasing.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Oct, 2017 01:32 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Recently LIGO confirmed the existence of gravitational waves for the fourth time. Somewhere i read " Stick a bunch of neutrinos together in a certain asymmetric configuration and you can create gravitational waves". This is to say that "waves" can not be created without particles. GRAVITONS MAY NOT EXIST, BUT, DARK MASS PARTICLES MAY.
maunas24-10-13
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Oct, 2017 12:37 pm
@maunas24-10-13,
Since dark mass particles do not require any space to exist (infinitesimal dimensionless points, but with emergent or non-emergent gravitational effect), they are truly fundamental particles. On the other hand, hypothesized particles like GRAVITONS are considered as mediators of force, imo, A PARTICLE WHICH IS A MEDIATOR OF FORCE WILL ALWAYS OCCUPY SPACE AND THEREFORE BECOMES A COMPOSITE PARTICLE, BECAUSE...

FORCE CAUSES MOTION,
MOTION CHANGES MASS,
MASS IS ENERGY, AND, ENERGY ADDED OR DELETED TO A PARTICLE IS IN PIECES.

Any particle to which energy can be added or deleted is a composite particle, not a fundamental particle.
Singularity! Because entangled.
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Oct, 2017 12:53 pm
How do I get off this thread?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Oct, 2017 07:29 pm
So this guy has just been talking to himself for the last few years?
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
  1. Forums
  2. » CRUX OF COSMOS
  3. » Page 6
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/04/2021 at 11:43:07